@Croaker917 @wsbgnl I do think it is quite plausible a lot more died in Wuhan than reported, during the time period when it was under military lockdown and completely opaque. But since then, there hasn't been much going on covid-wise. That's a fact.
@Croaker917@wsbgnl我确实认为，在军事封锁和完全不透明的时期，武汉的死亡人数比报道的要多得多。但从那以后，新冠肺炎的发病率就没有多大变化。这是事实。
@Croaker917 @wsbgnl The actual numbers are so low you wouldn't see a difference on that scale. But again, you're right you can't trust the ACTUAL numbers.
@Croaker917@wsbgnl实际数字很低，你看不出在这个尺度上有什么不同。但你说得对，你不能相信实际的数字。
@Croaker917 @wsbgnl You can trust that there hasn't been any covid to speak of in China for two years. It's easily detectable by arrival testing of travelers in for example Japan, if it were there, but it isn't.
Exact numbers, no, but broad picture is accurate.
@Croaker917@wsbgnl你可以相信，中国已经两年没有新冠病毒了。例如，在日本，通过对旅行者的入境检测很容易发现，如果它在那里的话，但事实并非如此。
准确的数字是没有的，但总体来说是准确的。
@mskathleenquinn @WalkerBragman This one will likely continue to do well.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@DailyJLee @justthefacts85 @BernieDogs4 Stock market crashing meanwhile. https://t.co/xRInWIQeWs
发表时间：4年前 作者：aeon @AeonCoin@Kathleenquinn女士@WalkerBragman这一次可能会继续表现良好。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@DailyJLee@justthefact85@Berniedogs股市同时崩盘。https://t.co/xRInWIQeWs
@zorinaq As expected
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@gruntdoc @jeremyfaust Simpson's paradox yet again.
More breakthroughs which are usually mild but would have been asymptomatic or not infected at all before -> appears milder at case population perspective but actually more severe per individual.
@佐里纳克：果然如此
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@gruntdoc@jeremyfaust Simpson的悖论又一次出现了。
更多的突破通常是轻微的，但以前可能没有症状或根本没有感染->；从病例总体的角度来看，症状似乎较轻，但实际上每个人的症状更严重。
@mskathleenquinn @WalkerBragman Expect a massive effort to hide the enormous winter surge (which will likely start in September-October) at least until just after the election.
@Kathleenquin@WalkerBragman女士预计，至少要等到选举刚刚结束时，才会做出巨大的努力来掩盖冬季的激增（可能从9月至10月开始）。
@mskathleenquinn @WalkerBragman They know this, that's why they're trying to run on a Potemkin village version of ending it.
@Ms Kathleenquin@WalkerBragman他们知道这一点，这就是为什么他们试图在Potemkin村的版本中结束它。
@sanghyuk_shin @wsbgnl @What46HasDone This was a month ago, likely before the recent forecasts. But I don't think the idea of another surge late in the year is new.
@sanghyuk_shin@wsbgnl@What46一个月前就这么做了，很可能在最近的预测之前。但我认为今年晚些时候再次激增的想法并不新鲜。
@DonEford @wsbgnl @sleepyknave Huh? There's no conspiracy here, just normal business.
@DonEford@wsbgnl@sleepyknave，嗯？这里没有阴谋，只是正常的生意。
@denise_dewald @Reuters Seriously
https://www.itv.com/news/2022-...
@denise_dewald@Reuters
https://www.itv.com/news/2022-...
@DonEford @wsbgnl @sleepyknave Not only, but a lot are, and hospitals are assured that payment, and will in practice get paid for many if not most of the others too.
@DonEford@wsbgnl@sleepyknave不仅如此，而且还有很多是这样的，医院可以放心支付这笔费用，而且实际上，如果不是大多数的话，很多医院也会得到支付。
@JonLemire What the hell is he talking about? Ventilation was terrible.
https://twitter.com/JusDayDa/s... https://t.co/RPsw4kND5K
@JimRosenthal4 Every airplane
-whenever not moving 100mph
Every movie theatre
Every bar/nightclub
Every large conference or dinner
(such as below)
@polsiewski @CorsIAQ @Poppendieck @linseymarr @Don_Milton @HuffmanLabDU @DavidElfstrom @jljcolorado @citlanx https://t.co/mPt2qSth7h
@JonLemire他到底在说什么？通风很糟糕。
https://twitter.com/JusDayDa/s... https://t.co/RPsw4kND5K
@JimRosenthal4每架飞机
-每小时不移动100英里
每家电影院
每个酒吧/夜总会
每次大型会议或晚宴
（如下图）
@polsiewski@CorsIAQ@Poppendieck@linseymarr@Don_Milton@HuffmanLabDU@DavidElfstrom@jljcolorado@citlanxhttps://t.co/mPt2qSth7h
@JonLemire "frustration with the growing perception that the pandemic is effectively over"
This is the guy who just said the pandemic was over?
@JonLemire“越来越多的人认为大流行实际上已经结束，对此感到失望”
这就是刚才说大流行结束的那个人？
@DonEford @wsbgnl @sleepyknave Medicare paying for elderly hospitalization is not "over with", it's permanent.
Don't see those stock values hurting.
@DonEford@wsbgnl@sleepyknave Medicare为老年人住院支付的费用并不是“结束”，而是永久性的。
不要看到那些股票价值受损。
@BernieDogs4 @LazarusLong13 The only reason he didn't go to WHCD was to make a point for public consumption about "individual assessment of my personal risk"
@BernieDogs4@LazarusLong13他没有去WHCD的唯一原因是为了让公众了解“个人风险评估”
@What46HasDone @wsbgnl Thank you for the clarification. That wasn't a covid-19 response group briefing but having the response head present at the regular press briefing serves a somewhat similar purpose.
@What46 hasdone@wsbgnl感谢您的澄清。这并不是新冠肺炎应对小组的简报，但让应对负责人出席定期新闻发布会也有类似的目的。
@wsbgnl @What46HasDone I also don't think CDC is doing regular briefings including public access to career scientist experts, despite it being a campaign promise of the current administration to bring those back.
@wsbgnl@What46HasDone我也不认为疾控中心正在做定期的简报，包括公众接触职业科学家专家，尽管这是本届政府的一项竞选承诺，让他们回来。
@Marco_Piani @chargrille @medriva Both valid points, although the context of where I was retweeting it here was implicitly referring to the gap between infections and cases. Of course, cases are always (nearly) 100% reported!
@Marco_Piani@Chargrill@medriva这两个观点都是正确的，尽管我在这里转载它的背景暗示了感染和病例之间的差距。当然，病例总是（几乎）100%报告！
@wsbgnl @What46HasDone Pretty sure the last press briefing of the white house covid-19 response group was april 5.
@wsbgnl@WHAT46HASDENE非常确定白宫新冠肺炎应对小组的最后一次新闻发布会是4月5日。