@rkr @Bewickwren MERV 13 or 14. These aren't quite HEPA (99%) more like 80% but make up for it with lower strain on the fan and higher airflow, effectively cleaning the air to HEPA levels in a few passes.

@rkr@Bewickwren MERV 13或14。这些并不像80%那样是高效空气过滤器（99%），而是通过降低风扇的压力和更高的气流来弥补，在几次过程中有效地将空气净化到高效空气过滤器的水平。

@OnfromGambier @Bewickwren During Oregon fires a couple of years ago this was a lifesaver for my friend living there. AQI was like 500. Comercial HEPA filter did almost nothing even with all windows closed (too small). CR box cleaned up the air in the entire house.

@几年前俄勒冈州火灾期间，这是我住在那里的朋友的救命稻草。AQI大约是500。Comercial HEPA过滤器即使在所有窗户都关闭（太小）的情况下也几乎不起任何作用。CR-box净化了整个房间的空气。

@Aur0rab0realis9 @YikeYuke @RealSexyCyborg "lockdowns have terrible impacts on mental health"
"We locked down while waiting for effective vaccines"
This is better?

@Aur0rab0realis9@YikeYuke@RealSexyCyborg“封锁对心理健康有可怕的影响”
“我们在等待有效的疫苗时被锁定”
这样更好？

@BroomallSteve @KatyMcconkey @DrJohnHhess @farid__jalali The ONS survey in UK is a random sample so it isn't affected by people deciding to self test or not test. Nothing like that exists in the US.

@BroomallSteve@KatyMcconkey@Drjohnhess@farid__jalali英国国家统计局的调查是一个随机样本，因此不受决定是否进行自我测试的人的影响。美国不存在这样的情况。

@McGillJimmy80 @Young_Tibby @DecorumManager @medriva That's not better. It's either worse if you think non-hospitalized cases matter in any way (missing work, physical suffering short of acute distress, long covid, etc.) or the same if all you care about is hospitalization.

@McGillJimmy80@Young_Tibby@DecorumManager@medriva这并不好。如果你认为非住院病例在任何方面都很重要（旷工、身体不适、急性窘迫、长期新冠病毒感染等），情况会更糟，如果你只关心住院治疗，情况也会一样。

@Andy_Bloch @Usnea13 @BlissvilleRoad @EricTopol Highly doubtful there is enough precision in this sort of modeling to tell the difference.

@Andy_Bloch@Usnea13@BlissvilleRoad@EricTopol非常怀疑这种建模是否有足够的精度来区分差异。

@Greta_NP @JReinerMD @CDCDirector WTF

@Greta_NP@JReinerMD@CDC WTF总监

@maskupmelb Ancient meme but some can't be improved https://t.co/pLBjNFxbjD

@maskupmelb是一个古老的迷因，但有些无法改进https://t.co/pLBjNFxbjD

@TRyanGregory Would you settle for a nice soothing orange?

@你能接受一个好的舒缓橘子吗？

@maskupmelb Don't worry, it's disinfected
https://twitter.com/RobynSchof...

@maskupmelb别担心，已经消毒了
https://twitter.com/RobynSchof...

@CoNoiner @cubicearth @amjad_allobadi @JorgeStolfi @sarim_hidayat It solves the long clearance time.

@CoNoiner@cubicearth@amjad_allobadi@JorgeStolfi@sarim_hidayat解决了长时间清场的问题。

@amasad Complete segment here
https://americanarchive.org/ca...

@这里有完整的片段
https://americanarchive.org/ca...

@shipsands @TRyanGregory No evidence of community spread when testing limited to travelers is not forgivable.

@shipsands@TRyanGregory当仅限于旅行者的检测是不可原谅的时，没有证据表明社区传播。

@dix_reloaded @DGarrettR @opinion_left @notdred @AliceAvizandum @elonmusk @PPathole @remindmetweets Bzzt. Maybe 4th April

@dix_重新加载@DGarrettR@opinion_left@notdred@AliceAvizandum@elonmusk@PPathole@emendmentmetweets Bzzt。也许是4月4日

@WilliamBHoenig @notdred @AliceAvizandum @elonmusk @PPathole @remindmetweets Maybe next year.

@WilliamBHoenig@notdred@AliceAvizandum@elonmusk@PPathole@emendmentmetweets可能明年。

@gunnarflygt @loveisall1576 @setabrr165 @twiz718 @IAPonomarenko It's more there too

@gunnarflygt@loveisall1576@setabrr165@twiz718@IAPonomarenko这里也有更多

@mllichti @iamwhoisme @jaredpolis In a macro sense, reducing taxes is stimulative and plausibly would increase overall inflation (prices may fall on some things more heavily impacted by tariffs but then people would spend that money on something else, driving up those prices).

@mllichti@iamwhoisme@jaredpolis从宏观意义上讲，减税是刺激性的，似乎会增加总体通胀（一些受关税影响更大的东西的价格可能会下降，但人们会把钱花在其他东西上，从而推高价格）。

@mllichti @iamwhoisme @jaredpolis They're a tax but as with every tax the incidence falls to some degree on both consumers and producers. How much in any particular instance is hard to say with certainty and often hotly debated.

@mllichti@iamwhoisme@jaredpolis它们是一种税，但与每一种税一样，其影响在一定程度上都落在消费者和生产者身上。在任何特定情况下，有多少是很难确定的，而且经常引起激烈的争论。

@Citybythesea2 @RocCityBuilt @jaredpolis There is a lot of disagreement about whether current inflation is driven by supply or demand. It's probably some of both.

@Citybythesea2@RocCityBuilt@jaredpolis关于当前的通货膨胀是由供给还是需求驱动，存在很多分歧。可能两者都有。

@wsbgnl @n_hold This sort of thing worked for Trump, to a point (another story as to why). It is probably with some frustration that Biden's team finds it doesn't work for them, but continues trying.

@wsbgnl@n_hold这类事情在某种程度上对特朗普起了作用（另一个关于原因的故事）。拜登的团队可能有些沮丧地发现这对他们不起作用，但仍在继续努力。