@TheDanDraper1 I know for a fact that they are very, very vulnerable. The lack of due diligence is coming back to bite them, and it will get worse as the industry matures.

@我知道的事实是，他们非常非常脆弱。缺乏尽职调查又回来了，而且随着行业的成熟，情况会变得更糟。

@TheDanDraper1 It is not that common in my experience. It's likely that @chainlink licenses tech from sources such as #Cornell, but I can't know for sure, since I haven't really researched it. This point came up last month, and someone did a deep dive search and couldn't produce a trail.

@在我的经验中，这并不常见。@chainlink很可能从#康奈尔大学（Cornell）等来源获得技术许可，但我不能确定，因为我还没有真正研究过它。上个月出现了这一点，有人进行了深入搜索，但没有找到踪迹。

@reggiemiddlton daily macro. Many are debating the effects of @federalresearve rate increases, without bothering to see #MotherMarket has already raised rates. Today's inflation is largely structural/printing borne. Increasing rates risk real stagflation!
https://boombustblog.com/compo... https://t.co/hwzA2qnWI0

@雷吉米德尔顿每日宏。许多人都在争论@federalresearve利率提高的效果，却懒得去看#MotherMarket已经提高了利率。今天的通货膨胀主要是结构性的。提高利率有可能导致真正的滞胀！
https://boombustblog.com/compo... https://t.co/hwzA2qnWI0

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink Ad hominem attacks & mythical boogie monster, aka "patent troll" insults aside, you still haven't made a point.
I post a patent of an entrepaneur/financial engineer that may tangential to a billion dollar business, and you call him a "patent troll scam"? Answer my question.

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink Ad homeem攻击&；神话中的布吉怪兽，又名“专利巨魔”，撇开侮辱不谈，你还没说清楚。
我发布了一个创业者/财务工程师的专利，可能与一项价值10亿美元的业务无关，你称他为“专利巨魔骗局”？回答我的问题。

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink Explain. I'm not as swift as the average crypto enthusiast. I see an expired patent & another expiring by year end. 1 looks like it applies, but is assigned to #CornellUniversity, assuming @chainlink licenses it. How does that apply to the '797 patent, and how are things fine?

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink解释。我不像一般的密码爱好者那么敏捷。我看到一个过期的专利&；另一个将于年底到期。1看起来适用，但被分配给#康奈尔大学，假设@chainlink许可它。这对797年的专利有何影响？情况如何？

@TheDanDraper1 @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink The IP challenges approaching in the next few quarters stem from the highly unrealistic and imprudent mindset of early crypto adopters that US laws don't apply to the crypto industry. IP strategy was ignored, due diligence non-existent. @chainlink, L2s & VCs are vulnerable here https://t.co/2rCshBWG8f

@Andraper1@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink未来几个季度即将面临的IP挑战源于早期密码采用者的高度不切实际和轻率心态，即美国法律不适用于密码行业。知识产权战略被忽视，尽职调查不存在@chainlink，L2s&；风投在这里很脆弱https://t.co/2rCshBWG8f

As if on cue: A @Coindesk review of the #BTC public ledger shows 4 portions of the ~20 BTC raised to fund the trucker's protest (ordered frozen by Canadian authorities) ended up at Coinbase, https://crypto.com/. Do you see this $BTC as fungible & liquid as others at the CEXs? https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...

仿佛在暗示：@Cointdesk对#BTC公共分类账的审查显示，为卡车司机抗议筹集的~20 BTC（加拿大当局下令冻结）中有4部分最终在Coinbase结束，https://crypto.com/.你认为这个$BTC是可替代的吗；和CEXs的其他人一样液体？https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...

@999aggambit No, they do not. A $100 dollar bill with serial number jnsqdf981ur3ijqkfjq that has been tagged as dirty money is not as fungible as a similar (but not the same) dollar bill that hasn't. That is the entire concept behind KYC/AML, and likely a significant strategy used in article

@999A范围不，他们没有。一张序列号为jnsqdf981ur3ijqkfjq的100美元钞票被标记为“脏钱”，与一张没有被标记为“脏钱”的类似（但不是相同）的钞票相比，它是不可替代的。这是KYC/AML背后的整个概念，可能是本文中使用的一个重要策略

@999aggambit So, if the #bitcoin that was tagged and tainted (T&T) as being used to fund a terrorist attack in Madrid ended up in your wallet, do you mean to tell me that you believe that particular coin would have the same liquidity, value and fungibility as a bitcoin that wasn't "T&T"?

@999A那么，如果被贴上标签并被污染的比特币（T&T）被用来资助马德里的恐怖袭击，但最后却被放在了你的钱包里，你的意思是说，你相信特定的比特币将具有与非“T&T”比特币相同的流动性、价值和可替换性吗？

@silverguru22 is a class act. A downright pleasure to be interviewed by him. Thank you, David! For those who haven't seen our interview on macro, metals and the fundamentals of crypto, click this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://t.co/PUULhFtNMh

@silverguru22是一个班级表演。能接受他的采访真是太好了。谢谢你，大卫！对于那些没有看过我们关于宏观、金属和加密基础知识的采访的人，请点击此链接https://www.youtube.com/watch?... https://t.co/PUULhFtNMh

@sharpy929 @Theta_Network A) That's an ignorant comment. You've no idea what this private entity filed, or not
B) Litigation is, by far, the most inefficient way to come to nigh any resolution
C) Are U a crypto IP expert?
D) I didn't do anything to Theta except answer their allegations & token holders

@这是一个无知的评论。你不知道这个私人实体申请了什么
B） 到目前为止，诉讼是达成任何解决方案最低效的方式
C） 你是加密IP专家吗？
D） 除了回答他们的指控，我没有对西塔做任何事；代币持有者

@fortunekr75 Yeah! Can't argue with you there. Many lean towards convenience in the convenience vs privacy trade-off. By definition, CEXs should have nigh zero business outside of fiat conversion, & even that should be dying off with the broader acceptance of stable coins & algorithmic coins

@是啊！我不能和你争辩。在便利与隐私的权衡中，许多人倾向于便利。根据定义，除了菲亚特转换，CEX应该几乎没有业务；随着稳定货币的广泛接受，这一点也将逐渐消失；算法硬币

If this is a true story, all is do is add a negative gratuity, you know... To counter all of those negative real rates I've been paying. https://twitter.com/WallStreet...

如果这是一个真实的故事，你所要做的就是增加一个负面的小费，你知道。。。来抵消我一直在支付的负实际利率。https://twitter.com/WallStreet...

Now, Let's hear from all of the cyberpunk maximalist types who swear laws IP/civil/criminal/etc. don't apply to opensource, decentralized platforms. I bet @opensea thinks it applies. Who wants to wager on whether they respond or not, and if they do, then welcome to the real world https://twitter.com/dubz0922/s...

现在，让我们来听听所有网络朋克极大化主义者的观点，他们发誓法律IP/民事/刑事/等等不适用于开源、去中心化的平台。我敢打赌@opensea认为它适用。谁想打赌他们是否会回应，如果他们回应了，欢迎来到现实世界https://twitter.com/dubz0922/s...

What do you call a #bitcoin that can be #unmixed, identified & traced directly back to you despite mixers, #VPN #TOR etc? I'd call it an #NFT! Any coin with that level of traceability, atomically identifiable isn't FUNGIBLE! Surprise!
https://www.chainalysis.com/ch... https://t.co/8lo811Sruq

你怎么称呼一种可以#不混合、可识别&；的#比特币；直接追溯到你，尽管有混音器、VPN、TOR等等？我称之为#NFT！任何具有原子级可追溯性的硬币都是不可替代的！惊喜
https://www.chainalysis.com/ch... https://t.co/8lo811Sruq

RT: @eddiesolis1069 @dao_veri @Veritaseuminc @SECGov From a cursory analysis of the claimant’s submissions it is only about 200, or so out of >10k holders. And, claimants keep the VERI as well, which is also interesting. So, holders don’t trust the process and this is just another indicator as to why? @RoslynLayton @EleanorTerrett

转发：@eddiesolis1069@dao_veri@veritaseumic@SECGov根据对索赔人提交的材料的粗略分析，它仅为大约200份，约占>；10公里保持者。而且，索赔人还保留了VERI，这也很有趣。所以，持有者不信任这个过程，这只是另一个原因的指标@RoslynLayton@EleanorTerrett

This is not the first time that this allegation against the SEC has come up. https://twitter.com/WRBillings... https://t.co/LbYr2vl3Hm

这不是第一次出现针对SEC的指控。https://twitter.com/WRBillings... https://t.co/LbYr2vl3Hm

RT: So, an adjudicated process of about 200 claimants out of >10k wallets turns into an unlimited time line in an attempt to address investor’s losses? It’s interesting the plaintiff(SEC)and executor(VFF) of the judgment control the judicial process. @dao_veri @Veritaseuminc @SECGov https://t.co/Nztw52jpD7

RT：所以，一个由大约200名索赔人组成的裁决程序；为了解决投资者的损失，10万个钱包变成了无限时间线？有趣的是，判决的原告（SEC）和执行人（VFF）控制着司法程序@dao_veri@Veritaseuminc@SECGovhttps://t.co/Nztw52jpD7

@Forbes To be fair, if you have 3 factual inaccuracies in the first paragraph of your article, it is not far fetched to believe that you have other errors in the balance of your article. I'm not trying to say that you're wrong, just saying.... https://t.co/lTdEaSjjjk

@公平地说，如果你在文章的第一段中有三处事实错误，相信你在文章的其余部分还有其他错误并不牵强。我不是说你错了，只是说。。。。https://t.co/lTdEaSjjjk

@immortaligbo @Forbes They are also WRONG! If you are going to accuse someone of an $11B theft, "popular trends for crypto casuals" doesn't cut it. Imagine if you were incorrectly accused. Now, I don't know if the guy did it, or didn't, but it does a lot in terms of credibility to stick to the facts.

@他们也错了！如果你要指控某人盗窃110亿美元，那么“加密休闲流行趋势”并不能解决这个问题。想象一下，如果你被错误地指控。现在，我不知道这家伙是做了还是没有做，但坚持事实在可信度方面做了很多。