@proffernandez Thank you for your supportive words. They mean more than you may know.

@谢谢你的支持。它们的意义比你可能知道的要多。

@BarletteTim Swift is a messaging service, not a bank. Smaller banks use this messaging services. Thinking it like Gmail, but for banks.

@BarletteTim Swift是一种信息服务，而不是银行。较小的银行使用这种信息服务。就像Gmail，但对银行来说。

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 @compoundfinance @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital @CornellUnivers @initc3org I have no case to arbitrate, but thanks anyway.

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@ChainLinkGod@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2299324@compoundfinance@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital@cornelluvers@initc3org我没有仲裁的理由，不过还是要谢谢你。

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 @compoundfinance @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital @CornellUnivers @initc3org And so does everyone else. Still, only 10% of blockchain patent apps approved (reference the Town Crier patent app denial). I suggest you stop calling strangers trolls and scammers & really take the effort to learn some of this stuff. You'll find big tech are the real trolls! https://t.co/gYcrYnDORS

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@ChainLinkGod@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2299324@compoundfinance@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital@cornelluvers@initc3org，其他人也是如此。尽管如此，只有10%的区块链专利应用获得批准（参考Town Crier专利应用拒绝）。我建议你不要再称陌生人为巨魔和骗子；真的要努力学习这些东西。你会发现科技巨头才是真正的巨魔！https://t.co/gYcrYnDORS

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 @compoundfinance @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital How much did @chainlink pay @CornellUnivers for the IP rights? What were the terms?
Not trying to troll $Link (at all), but so many in crypto take extremely specialized, extremely technical professions for a joke. IP law, derivative finance, virology. I know what I don't know!

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@ChainLinkGod@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2299324@compoundfinance@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital@chainlink为知识产权向CornellUnivers支付了多少钱？条件是什么？
虽然根本不想操控$Link，但很多密码行业的人都把极其专业、极其技术化的职业当成了一个笑话。知识产权法、衍生金融、病毒学。我知道我不知道的！

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 @compoundfinance @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital First of all, you are asking a patent troll blockchain scammer for advice. That's not a good look.
Secondly, you are using the word "patent", when @TheDanDraper1 made it clear that it was a "denied" patent "application" that was in appeal. Seldom does the USPTO change their mind.

@nullpackets@theandraper1@ChainLinkGod@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2299324@compoundfinance@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital首先，你在向专利巨魔区块链骗子寻求建议。那可不好看。
第二，你使用的是“专利”一词，当时@TheAndraper1明确表示，上诉的是一项“被驳回的”专利申请。美国专利局很少改变主意。

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 @compoundfinance @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital I'm no lawyer, but some common sense questions you can ask yourself.
1) Did you read the patent? If not, see 1.
2) After seeing the video, can the avg person build a Town Crier? If no, fails to be enabling.
3) If vid's enabling, it's prior art invalidates $link own TC patent app

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@ChainLinkGod@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2299324@compoundfinance@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital我不是律师，但你可以问自己一些常识问题。
1） 你看过专利吗？如果没有，请参见1。
2） 在看了视频后，avg的人能建造一个城镇哭喊者吗？如果否，则无法启用。
3） 如果启用vid，现有技术将使$link自有TC专利应用失效

@TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @nullpackets @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 @compoundfinance @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital Yes, and it's not just with $link. Many other projects have a near rabid fanbase, and some don't even have a value producing product, i.,e., #HEX.
I fee that as more advanced investors enter the space and regulators stop picking winners/losers & actually regulate, this will taper

@Andraper1@ChainLinkGod@nullpackets@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2299324@compoundfinance@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital是的，这不仅仅是因为$link。许多其他项目拥有近乎狂热的粉丝群，有些项目甚至没有产生价值的产品，即#HEX。
我认为，随着越来越多的高级投资者进入这个领域，监管机构不再挑选赢家/输家；实际上，这将逐渐减少

You guys aren't paying attention! Here's crypto pass/fail inflection point - the geopolitical/global macro litmus test v the establishment.
But... few are going to realize what grade it gets, for they're too busy looking at price charts go up and down and trolling social media https://twitter.com/NPR/status...

你们没注意！这里是加密通过/失败的拐点——地缘政治/全球宏观试金石对建制的考验。
但是很少有人会意识到它得到了什么分数，因为他们太忙于查看价格图表的涨跌和社交媒体https://twitter.com/NPR/status...

@dmnyc @getumbrel Who is he? Let me know and I will go patronize him this weekend.

@dmnyc@getumbrel他是谁？让我知道，我会在这个周末光顾他。

@TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @nullpackets @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 Well, technically they can own the IP unless it was successfully patented by someone else. They simply don't control the rights to the IP.
That is if I am not mistaken, according to (again) my unqualified and uneducated opinion.

@andraper1@ChainLinkGod@nullpackets@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2993224从技术上讲，他们可以拥有IP，除非它被其他人成功获得专利。他们根本不控制知识产权。
如果我没有弄错的话，根据（再次）我无保留的、未受过教育的观点。

@ChainLinkGod @TheDanDraper1 @nullpackets @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 "Patent trolling" is used too loosely. The author of that patent is an accomplished industry practitioner and inventor. That is not trolling, that is protecting your property. Secondly, I doubt you reviewed that complex patent in the minutes since I posted it, so you're guessing!

@ChainLinkGod@TheDanDraper1@nullpackets@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2993224“专利跟踪”的使用过于松散。该专利的作者是一位有成就的行业实践者和发明家。这不是拖，而是保护你的财产。第二，我怀疑你在我发布后的几分钟内审查了那项复杂的专利，所以你在猜！

@TheDanDraper1 @ChainLinkGod @nullpackets @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 It gets worse. @compoundfinance #DAO was private equity vehicle for @coinbase @a16z @BainCapital. No IP DD meant (in my uneducated opinion) ~2 patents likely infringed, VCs exposed 2 #Joint&Several contributory infringement liability. Worsened, due 2 fighting instead of licensing

@Andraper1@ChainLinkGod@nullpackets@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2993224情况变得更糟@compoundfinance#DAO是@coinbase@a16z@BainCapital的私募股权工具。没有IP DD意味着（在我未受过教育的观点中）大约2项专利可能被侵犯，风投暴露了2#合资公司；若干共同侵权责任。更糟的是，由于2次战斗而不是许可证

@ChainLinkGod @TheDanDraper1 @nullpackets @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 And that is exactly where they're vulnerable! That land has been patented already. See https://patents.google.com/pat.... Once that offchain data is utilized in a DLT system with asymmetric keypairs, chances are it will drift into other patented territory as well & it will be hard to avoid

@ChainLinkGod@TheAndRaper1@nullpackets@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2993224，这正是他们易受攻击的地方！那片土地已经获得了专利。看见https://patents.google.com/pat....一旦这些链外数据在具有非对称密钥对的DLT系统中使用，它很可能也会转移到其他专利领域；这将很难避免

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 The lack of proper due diligence in this space is pervasive, and doesn't exist in any other large industry.
Anathema towards patents/IP protection is downright nonsensical & obviously unsustainable. Look at @Uniswap @AaveAave @compoundfinance @CurveFinance etc. All backtracking

@nullpackets@theandraper1@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@JunkoSu22993224这一领域普遍缺乏适当的尽职调查，在任何其他大型行业都不存在。
对专利/知识产权保护的诅咒是彻头彻尾的荒谬&；显然是不可持续的。看看@Uniswap@aaveave@compoundfinance@CurveFinance等，都是回溯

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 N0! Not "a systemic risk to the entire modern modular heterogeneous blockchain #DeFI ecosystem". It is only a risk to those who approach a multi-trillion $ biz with "patent troll scam in blockchain".
IP due diligence is requisite for capital investment. U guys fell upon the sword

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@junkosu2993224 N0！不是“对整个现代模块化异构区块链#DeFI生态系统的系统性风险”。对于那些通过“区块链中的专利巨魔骗局”接近数万亿美元业务的人来说，这只是一个风险。
知识产权尽职调查是资本投资的必要条件。你们倒在剑上

@accretionist @AzanyahM @PeterSchiff @hus_qy Points to ponder of true inquiry...
1 How much energy does #bitcoin consume?
2 How much value does #BTC add? 1 - 2 = X
3 How much energy does the banking industry consume (realistically, office construction/heating/cooling/data centers/lighting, etc.)?
4) Ditto for auto industry?

@吸积论者@AzanyahM@PeterSchiff@hus_qy指出要思考真正的探究。。。
1#比特币消耗多少能量？
2#BTC增加了多少价值？1-2=X
3银行业消耗了多少能源（实际上，办公建筑/供暖/制冷/数据中心/照明等）？
4） 汽车工业也是如此？

@Bloomberg reports: Cryptocurrency a Potential New Tool for Billionaires to Avoid Sanctions
Individuals and other entities targeted in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine may circumvent penalties if they choose to use crypto.
Most have now idea of the true power of this tech https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...

@彭博社报道：加密货币是亿万富翁避免制裁的潜在新工具
俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后成为攻击目标的个人和其他实体如果选择使用加密技术，可能会逃避惩罚。
现在大多数人都知道这项技术的真正威力https://twitter.com/ReggieMidd...

Thanks!

谢谢

@nullpackets @TheDanDraper1 @RiderzofRohan @coinbasebr0 @chainlink @JunkoSu22993224 Well, you start the conversation with "patent troll scam in blockchain", so excuse me if I find your objectivity to be a tad suspect.
Patent applications are not patents, and even moreso in the DLT space. 9 out of 10 blockchain USPTO applications are rejected, as you see in w/ TC

@nullpackets@TheDanDraper1@RiderzofRohan@coinbasebr0@chainlink@JunkoSu22993224好吧，你从“区块链中的专利巨魔骗局”开始对话，所以如果我觉得你的客观性有点可疑，请原谅。
专利申请不是专利，在DLT领域更是如此。正如您在w/TC中看到的，10个区块链USPTO申请中有9个被拒绝