@0xfbifemboy Even if that small business owner does spend a lot of time on that old documentation, and even if IRS does accept it resulting in little or no additional tax liability, they never get that time back. So yes there are societal costs to enforcement that aren't on the budget.
@0xfbifemboy 即使那个小企业主确实在旧文件上花费了大量时间，即使 IRS 确实接受它导致很少或没有额外的纳税义务，他们也永远不会得到那个时间。因此，是的，执行的社会成本不在预算之内。
@RangaRunner @MichaelSFuhrer @BurnetInstitute There is a pretty big difference there in terms of the duration of the wave (and therefore total cases) even if the peak doesn't change much. Whether or not accurate vs. reality, their model does not show no difference.
@RangaRunner @MichaelSFuhrer @BurnetInstitute 即使峰值变化不大，波的持续时间（以及总病例数）也存在很大差异。无论是否准确与现实，他们的模型并没有显示出任何差异。
@LogicalMD33 @guardianelm @justinquinnn @DrLeanaWen If this were true everyone present for any period of time in a space with virus with anything less than an excellent respirator would always get infected (at least back in 2020 w/no immunity). That didn't happen. Exposure dosage (i.e. time, concentration, and filtration) matters.
@LogicalMD33 @guardianelm @justinquinnn @DrLeanaWen 如果这是真的，那么任何人在任何时间都存在于带有病毒的空间中，而且任何东西都比优秀的呼吸器低，总是会被感染（至少在 2020 年没有免疫力）。那没有发生。暴露剂量（即时间、浓度和过滤）很重要。
@zhang_yueting @LazarusLong13 She's not even coherent. It's like she picks a talking point out of a bowl with slips of paper and shoves it out there.
[pulls slip]
"We're not in the same place as 2020 or 2021!"
@zhang_yueting @LazarusLong13 她连连贯都没有。就像她用纸条从碗里挑出一个话题，然后把它推到外面。
[拉滑]
“我们和2020年或2021年不在同一个地方！”
@DataDrivenMD https://twitter.com/FAANews/st...
Due to unexpected staff availability tonight, the FAA must reduce the flow of aircraft around New York City to maintain safety. Evening delays may be 2 hrs at @JFKairport, @LGAairport & @EWRairport. Check https://fly.faa.gov/ for updates & w/ your airline for flight info.
发表时间：3年前 作者：The FAA ✈️ @FAANews@DataDrivenMD https://twitter.com/FAANews/st...
由于今晚意外的工作人员可用性，美国联邦航空局必须减少纽约市周围的飞机流量以保持安全。 @JFKairport、@LGAairport 的晚间延误可能为 2 小时
@JordanChariton @SteveAHorn It's not even where most Americans are, and it never was. The talking point was manipulative (non) policy advocacy all along.
https://twitter.com/luckytran/...
Many of us who been organizing and advocating for mandates and more protections are not stunned by this, because we have been following the polls closely over the entire pandemic.
We know that policy is not following public opinion because of special interests. https://twitter.com/GYamey/sta...
@JordanChariton @SteveAHorn 这甚至不是大多数美国人所在的地方，而且从来都不是。谈话的重点一直是操纵性（非）政策宣传。
https://twitter.com/luckytran/...
我们中许多一直在组织和倡导授权和更多保护措施的人并没有对此感到震惊，因为我们一直在密切关注整个大流行的民意调查。
我们知道，由于特殊利益，政策不遵循舆论。 https://twitter.com/GYamey/sta...
@chipmcdonald @JordanChariton The actual number is FAR higher than 120k per day might be a million per day or more.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@DrLeanaWen @tarahaelle Infection wave based on wastewater, since testing has been abandoned and reported cases are no longer representative of actual rates of spread. https://t.co/gMoQ7BkLV1
发表时间：3年前 作者：aeon @AeonCoin@chipmcdonald @JordanChariton 实际数字远高于每天 120k，可能是每天一百万或更多。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...
@DrLeanaWen @tarahaelle 基于废水的感染波，因为测试已被放弃，并且报告的病例不再代表实际的传播速度。 https://t.co/gMoQ7BkLV1
@DrKatrin_Rabiei @tomfolanmd How twitter allows the most arrogant most loud and most wrong to block all competent scrutiny thereby enlarging their echo chamber following is terrible.
Anyway, thank you for doing your best to inform.
@DrKatrin_Rabiei @tomfolanmd 推特如何让最傲慢、最响亮和最错误的人阻止所有有能力的审查，从而扩大他们的回声室跟踪是可怕的。
无论如何，感谢您尽最大努力告知。