@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover ROFL 😂😂🤣🤣
Don't forget, that includes 66 million soft drinks!

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover ROFL 😂😂🤣🤣
别忘了，这包括 6600 万份软饮料！

@moral_hazard @mattyglesias Amazing that he thinks this manner of engagement helps him.

@moral_hazard @mattyglesias 令人惊讶的是，他认为这种参与方式对他有帮助。

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover There are a lot of them, and then way more borderline A/B- and B-listers not quiet at 9 figures but still easily 7-8 figures.
Ballooning inequality is a real thing.

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover 有很多，然后是更多的边缘 A/B- 和 B-listers 在 9 位数时不安静，但仍然很容易达到 7-8 位数。
膨胀的不平等是真实存在的。

@MarvinH2_G2 @MeetJess @ToshiAkima @RolandBakerIII They expected demand to be lower would be my guess.

@MarvinH2_G2 @MeetJess @ToshiAkima @RolandBakerIII 我猜他们预计需求会降低。

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover Like seasoned A list celebrities tend now to be in the 9 figure club. They're 'rich' and can stay that way if not stupid even if they never get another movie role or release another album. Lots of high income working people are not.

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover 像经验丰富的名人现在往往在 9 位数俱乐部。他们很“有钱”，即使他们永远不会获得另一个电影角色或发行另一张专辑，他们也可以保持这种状态，即使他们不是愚蠢的。很多高收入劳动者不是。

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover High costs mostly. You're screwed if you want to maintain lifestyle but change carriers (to lower pay) or even face a difficult layoff.
I say 'rich' is someone whose lifestyle is more assured by their assets than it is tied to a particular job, but sure the term is ambiguous.

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover 主要是高成本。如果您想维持生活方式但更换运营商（以降低工资）甚至面临艰难的裁员，那您就完蛋了。
我说“富人”是指他们的生活方式更受资产保障而不是与特定工作挂钩的人，但肯定这个词是模棱两可的。

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover It's golden handcuffs in a way. High income doesn't necessarily mean "rich" and a million or two doesn't mean being free of the high income job (all all of its associated bullshit and stress) if you want to maintain lifestyle.

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover 在某种程度上它是金手铐。如果您想维持生活方式，高收入并不一定意味着“富有”，一两百万并不意味着摆脱高收入工作（所有相关的废话和压力）。

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover Interesting thought experiment perhaps is to tinker with the 50%. Would go for it if the $50m was 70%? 80%? 90%? Where are these numbers and why?

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover 有趣的思想实验也许是修补 50%。如果 5000 万美元是 70%，会去吗？ 80%？ 90%？这些数字在哪里，为什么？

@TRyanGregory South Korea and Japan look to be doing at least as well as most of the others just in terms of current mortality, although it remains to be seen how the current waves and lagging death curves will play out. Japan appears to have peaked, maybe SK too.

@TRyanGregory 就目前的死亡率而言，韩国和日本看起来至少与其他大多数国家一样好，尽管目前的浪潮和滞后的死亡曲线将如何发挥作用还有待观察。日本似乎已经达到顶峰，也许SK也是。

@mgerrydoyle Mission kill.

@mgerrydoyle 任务杀。

@myrabatchelder Data in thread ⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@myrabatchelder 线程中的数据⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover Many have serious burnout with their high income careers and are really looking for a way out without taking a big hit to lifestyle and viability of family financial goals. The $50m would be a very tempting exit and the $1m would not (but also tempting as a step toward).

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover 许多人对他们的高收入职业感到严重倦怠，并且真的在寻找出路，而不会对生活方式和家庭财务目标的可行性造成重大打击。 5000 万美元将是一个非常诱人的退出，而 100 万美元则不会（但也很诱人）。

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover I know many people who make $250k. They generally have net worths of a good fraction of a million already or in some cases over a million (especially if including home and retirement funds). All or most would think hard about which button to push. Some would push each, I think.

@AnyOnly2 @itsthelee @IDoTheThinking @pickover 我认识很多赚 25 万美元的人。他们通常已经拥有一百万的净资产，或者在某些情况下超过一百万（特别是如果包括家庭和退休基金）。所有人或大多数人都会认真考虑按下哪个按钮。我认为有些人会推动每个人。

@GeoffGoyer @TheDemocrats It is https://t.co/5ubGZfKbZ9

@GeoffGoyer @TheDemocrats 它是 https://t.co/5ubGZfKbZ9

@LongDesertTrain @ENirenberg @PeacockFlu @Asinickle1 @siamosolocani It would be interesting to see whether this intuition aligns with experience from places that are still doing rigorous contact tracing. Maybe that is just China.

@LongDesertTrain @ENirenberg @PeacockFlu @Asinickle1 @siamosolocani 看看这种直觉是否与仍在进行严格的接触者追踪的地方的经验一致会很有趣。也许这只是中国。

@Marco_Piani On a completely unrelated note, long covid psychosis.
https://twitter.com/EricTopol/...

@Marco_Piani 在一个完全不相关的注释上，长期的共病精神病。
https://twitter.com/EricTopol/...

@nate_bronze @mattyglesias Funny how nobody ever wants to do this. See also teachers.

@nate_bronze @mattyglesias 有趣的是没有人愿意这样做。另见教师。

@itsthelee @SteveMock1961 @IDoTheThinking @pickover I don't know without thinking about it a bit but that's along the lines of the alternative version I've been throwing out there.
I never meant to suggest that "life changing or not" was the only way to decide, it's just a consideration.

@itsthelee @SteveMock1961 @IDoTheThinking @pickover 我不考虑一下就知道了，但这与我一直扔在那里的替代版本一致。
我从来没有打算暗示“改变或不改变生活”是唯一的决定方式，这只是一个考虑因素。

@itsthelee @SteveMock1961 @IDoTheThinking @pickover It doesn't have to be 50x more even with a very simple model. You're only 2x more likely to realize the $1 million rather than the $50m. If $50m were say 5x more life changing it might be reasonable choice for some.
Making it 20% for $50m might also make it more interesting.

@itsthelee @SteveMock1961 @IDoTheThinking @pickover 即使使用非常简单的模型，它也不必多出 50 倍。你实现 100 万美元而不是 5000 万美元的可能性只有 2 倍。如果说 5000 万美元是改变生活的 5 倍，那么这对某些人来说可能是合理的选择。
以 5000 万美元的价格将其提高 20% 也可能使其更有趣。

@wsbgnl @nailatrahman I'm surprised this gap has gotten larger. I expected the largest share of the gap to be in early 2020 when e.g. people were told to stay home until turning blue, left to die, and taken to mass graves in NYC. But maybe those were eventually coded as covid deaths after all.

@wsbgnl @nailatrahman 我很惊讶这个差距越来越大。我预计差距的最大份额将在 2020 年初，例如人们被告知要待在家里直到脸色发青，然后等死，然后被带到纽约市的万人坑。但也许这些最终被编码为covid死亡。