Aeon 的最新消息

@sejwatson @apmalong @sameo416 No, I don't. I've seen numbers from 50 to 1000 and maybe even outside of that range. Also may depend on the nature of the particles (larger particles may contain more virus but behave differently from smaller particles). Seems to be a lot of uncertainty around this.

@sejwatson @apmalong @sameo416 不,我没有。我见过从 50 到 1000 的数字,甚至可能超出这个范围。也可能取决于颗粒的性质(较大的颗粒可能含有更多的病毒,但与较小的颗粒表现不同)。这似乎有很多不确定性。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wanderer_jasnah @juli_bg_bs Most people don't get the flu that often (5-10y so a limited of times in a lifetime). It's one of the reasons why considering covid to be "a flu" or "like the flu" has been completely wrong at least so far.

@wanderer_jasnah @juli_bg_bs 大多数人不会经常感染流感(5-10 岁,因此一生中的次数有限)。这就是为什么将新冠病毒视为“流感”或“像流感一样”至少到目前为止是完全错误的原因之一。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wanderer_jasnah @juli_bg_bs Probably good idea to just stop calling them boosters. Made sense when trying to tweak the original, made in haste, dosing schedule, but at this point they're akin to flu shots. "Covid shot".

@wanderer_jasnah @juli_bg_bs 停止称他们为助推器可能是个好主意。当试图调整原始的、匆忙的、给药计划时是有道理的,但在这一点上,它们类似于流感疫苗。 “新冠肺炎”。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@GiancarloSopo Not sure I agree with the interpretation. Correct is "Americans self-identify as less as ''liberal''".
If one looked at position on policies, the result might be different.

@GiancarloSopo 不确定我是否同意这种解释。正确的是“美国人自我认同不如''自由''”。
如果看一下政策立场,结果可能会有所不同。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@apmalong @sameo416 Way higher prevalence too.

@apmalong @sameo416 患病率也更高。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl Kids were "in school", often warehoused without teachers (or with unqualified subs) in gyms and auditoriums accomplishing nothing beyond child care and spreading more covid. Many businesses were not open, because too many workers were out sick.

@wsbgnl 孩子们“在学校”,通常在没有老师(或不合格的潜艇)的情况下存放在体育馆和礼堂里,除了托儿服务和传播更多的新冠病毒外,什么也做不了。许多企业没有营业,因为太多工人生病了。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BobMcElrath @tdrud Caches and floating point are needed for randomx.

@BobMcElrath @tdrud randomx 需要缓存和浮点。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ZekeEmanuel Try prevention.

@ZekeEmanuel 尝试预防。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Bulldozer0 @brucefenton This is four years old

@Bulldozer0 @brucefenton 这是四岁

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@tomofthenorth_ @Theresa_Chapple @sciliz @jaketapper WHICH DOES NOT MEAN IT IS INEFFECTIVE.
Keep on antimasking though, I'm sure you will.

@tomofthenorth_ @Theresa_Chapple @sciliz @jaketapper 这并不意味着它无效。
继续反掩蔽,我相信你会的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Americanhope78 @MeetJess There's no clear pattern. Alpha and more so Delta got more severe, Omicron maybe less severe. BA.5 probably more severe. Often hard to measure because later variants arrive with more population immunity.

@Americanhope78 @MeetJess 没有明确的模式。 Alpha 和更多,所以 Delta 变得更严重,Omicron 可能不那么严重。 BA.5 可能更严重。通常很难衡量,因为后来的变种具有更多的群体免疫力。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NDLoubere @EmilBergholtz It was blindingly obvious, but it's also obvious that's WHY it was built in the first place.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@EpiEllie It's not unrelated. A lot of the covid denialism is paid for or amplified by interest groups who stand to lose from climate change mitigation. They have enormous incentives to delegitimize collective action and destroy the capacity for it.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@NDLoubere @EmilBergholtz 这非常明显,但也很明显这就是它最初建造的原因。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@EpiEllie这不是无关的。许多对新冠肺炎的否认是由利益集团付出代价或扩大的,这些利益集团将在减缓气候变化方面蒙受损失。他们有巨大的动机去取消集体行动的合法性,破坏集体行动的能力。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@atrupar https://t.co/IRlyklo0Iy

@atrupar https://t.co/IRlyklo0Iy

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@EricTopol https://t.co/jY3CvDkCPI

@EricTopol https://t.co/jY3CvDkCPI

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@EricTopol Yes it was. It was like "living with a bad knee". You're supposed to just get used to it.

@EricTopol 是的。这就像“膝盖不好”。你应该习惯它。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CarlNyberg312 She doesn't have a public health degree.

@CarlNyberg312 她没有公共卫生学位。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NuritBaytch @i_petersen Well, besides that!

@NuritBaytch @i_petersen 好吧,除此之外!

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@tomofthenorth_ @Theresa_Chapple @sciliz @jaketapper Be an antimasker if you like, but don't lie about it.

@tomofthenorth_ @Theresa_Chapple @sciliz @jaketapper 如果你愿意,可以做一个反面具者,但不要撒谎。

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@tomofthenorth_ @Theresa_Chapple @sciliz @jaketapper There are options.
Flo mask, if it fits (no CI). Double masking a quality surgical (they come in kids sizes) with a tight fitting cloth mask over it also likely to be effective. KF94s also come in kids' sizes, though not sure about 4.
https://flomask.com/pages/faqs https://t.co/9SE5FlaWhX

@tomofthenorth_ @Theresa_Chapple @sciliz @jaketapper 有选择。
Flo 面罩,如果合适(无 CI)。用紧身布面罩对优质外科手术(它们有儿童尺寸)进行双重遮盖也可能有效。 KF94 也有儿童尺寸,但不确定是 4。
https://flomask.com/pages/faqs https://t.co/9SE5FlaWhX

发表时间:3年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情