Aeon 的最新消息

@jmcrookston @p0usr Pure hopium that results of one virus will be similar to others, even if in the same grouping.
SC 2 ≠ SC 1 ≠ MERS ≠ colds

@jmcrookston@p0usr纯hopium表明,一种病毒的结果将与其他病毒相似,即使是在同一组中。
SC 2≠ SC 1≠ 中东呼吸综合征≠ 感冒

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DailyJLee @flowermusickids @stargonewrong @ib_ktiv @Andre__Damon @DataDrivenMD If it has any persistent effects at all, short term deaths is definitely an understatement of total impact.
How likely is it that it doesn't?

@DailyJLee@flowermusickids@StargoneError@ib_ktiv@Andre___Damon@DataDrivenMD如果它有任何持久的影响,短期死亡绝对是对总体影响的轻描淡写。
它不存在的可能性有多大?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JoeBiden You're going to fix all the bridges for <$1 million each?

@JoeBiden你要为<$每人100万?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DailyJLee @flowermusickids @stargonewrong @ib_ktiv @Andre__Damon @DataDrivenMD CFR in the US has been consistent. If it breaks down, that would be something genuinely new. We will see.
It won't break down arbitrarily though. There will still be many deaths, as they are now.

@DailyJLee@flowermusickids@StargoneError@ib_ktiv@Andre___Damon@DataDrivenMD CFR在美国一直保持一致。如果它崩溃了,那将是真正的新事物。我们拭目以待。
不过,它不会随意崩溃。仍然会有很多人死亡,就像现在一样。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@WisconsinSpurs @Ldonahuehjelle @Bluedory12 @CDCgov @CDCDirector Jeff Zients
But I don't think that's the problem IN THIS INSTANCE. Finance practioners are proactive by nature. Medical researchers are not.

@威斯康星州NSPURS@Ldonahuehjelle@Bluedory12@CDCgov@CDCDirector Jeff Zients
但我不认为这是这个例子的问题。金融从业人员本质上是积极主动的。医学研究人员并非如此。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@flowermusickids @DailyJLee @stargonewrong @ib_ktiv @Andre__Damon @DataDrivenMD I'm not sure what that means but CFR is inherently biased yes.

@flowermusickids@DailyJLee@StargoneError@ib_ktiv@Andre__Damon@DataDrivenMD我不确定这意味着什么,但CFR天生就有偏见是的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FarukBoughaba @erlichya I don't know of a source for that.
35% absolutely matters. It's not the only factor, nor was that claimed here, only that it affects the rate of bending of the curve.

@FarukBoughaba@erlichya我不知道这个消息的来源。
35%绝对重要。这不是唯一的因素,也不是这里所说的,只是它影响曲线的弯曲速率。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@l_kim76 @justthefacts85 Wasn't clear but good point.

@l_kim76@justthefact85不清楚,但重点很好。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@KingKrebbs In person the docs. On social media, they're the same damn thing, all entertainers.

@KingKrebbs亲自查看文档。在社交媒体上,他们是同一个该死的东西,所有的艺人。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheRealRobbyT @DailyJLee @flowermusickids @stargonewrong @ib_ktiv @Andre__Damon @DataDrivenMD The testing RATE relative to the number of cases is not special, in fact it is low. Only 4 tests are being done for each case identified. Ideally it would be 20 or more. Only doing 4 tests per case identified means that it is likely a SMALLER share of cases are identified.

@因此,Robbyt@DailyJLee@flowermusickids@StargoneError@ib_ktiv@Andre__Damon@DataDrivenMD相对于病例数量的检测率并不特别,事实上它很低。对于每个确定的案例,仅进行了4次测试。理想情况下是20或更多。每个已识别的病例仅进行4次测试意味着可能识别的病例比例较小。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BaldingsWorld It doesn't say that. It says not AS effective.
Which is a surprise to no one, of course. CDC is way overdue in acknowledging reality.

@BaldingsWorld它没有这么说。它说没有那么有效。
当然,这对任何人来说都不奇怪。CDC早该承认现实了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheRealRobbyT @DailyJLee @flowermusickids @stargonewrong @ib_ktiv @Andre__Damon @DataDrivenMD Yes that shows exactly what I just said. Positivity
reached over 25%.
The increased tests are just documenting increased cases, not finding more. In fact they are under-finding.

@TheRealRobbyT@DailyJLee@flowermusickids@StargoneError@ib_ktiv@Andre__Damon@DataDrivenMD是的,这正好说明了我刚才所说的。积极性
达到25%以上。
增加的测试只是记录了增加的案例,没有发现更多。事实上,他们正在寻找。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FarukBoughaba @erlichya About 35% reduction in mobile-measured mobility in Sweden during last winter wave.

@FarukBoughaba@erlichya在去年冬季的浪潮中,瑞典的移动测量机动性降低了约35%。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FarukBoughaba @erlichya This isn't even remotely true https://t.co/lFKSDTNYh4

@FarukBoughaba@erlichya这根本不是真的https://t.co/lFKSDTNYh4

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheRealRobbyT @DailyJLee @flowermusickids @stargonewrong @ib_ktiv @Andre__Damon @DataDrivenMD The testing rate is nothing special. Positivity is extremely high, so those tests are just documenting high cases, they're not finding more.

@TheRealRobbyT@DailyJLee@flowermusickids@StargoneError@ib_ktiv@Andre__Damon@DataDrivenMD测试率没有什么特别之处。阳性率极高,所以这些测试只是记录了高发病率的病例,没有发现更多。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@l_kim76 @justthefacts85 That's not a reason not to also prepare for the future. Need to do both.

@l_kim76@justthefact85这不是不为未来做准备的理由。两者都要做。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FarukBoughaba @erlichya Restrictions and behavior are different things.

@FarukBoughaba@erlichya限制和行为是不同的事情。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@erlichya Wave 2 declined faster, right? What happened there?

@二里峡第二波下降得更快,对吗?那里发生了什么事?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@OmanReagan It's essentially the mask that WAS designed for everyone.
https://twitter.com/AbraarKara...

So there was a respirator FOR THE PUBLIC for emergencies such as a PANDEMIC by 3M from 2008
How in the hell did CDC recommend cloth masks for this long instead of pushing the federal government to scale up production for every single American immediately 2 years ago????? https://t.co/WrHj8goXW9

发表时间:4年前 作者:Abraar Karan @AbraarKaran

@OmanReagan它本质上是为每个人设计的面具。
https://twitter.com/AbraarKara...

因此,从2008年起,300万人因流感大流行等紧急情况使用了口罩
2年前,疾控中心怎么会推荐布制口罩这么长时间,而不是敦促联邦政府立即扩大每个美国人的生产?????https://t.co/WrHj8goXW9

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MullingMueller @inminivanhell How does that help?

@MullingMueller@inminivanhell这有什么帮助?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情