@WHCOS This is called base effect i.e. high "growth" from a previously depressed level.
In fact, has not even quite recovered to previous trend yet. https://t.co/jzz12Q5Xuo

@WHCOS这被称为基础效应，即从之前的低迷水平开始的高“增长”。
事实上，它甚至还没有完全恢复到之前的趋势。https://t.co/jzz12Q5Xuo

@Loretta_Torrago Precautionary principle = panicked spring
Taiwan "panicked" in January, which worked even better.

@Loretta_Torrago预防原则=恐慌的春天
台湾在1月份“恐慌”，效果更好。

@Gab_H_R @firefoxx66 Upper left

@Gab_H_R@firefoxx66左上角

@phil_luttazi @RMCarpiano @TheAtlantic That's per week and it was in September when overall case rates in Michigan were much lower (approx 1/10 of now).

@phil_luttazi@RMCarpiano@TheAtlantic每周都会出现这种情况，而在9月份，密歇根州的总体病例率要低得多（约为现在的1/10）。

@jwitker @Suzy4242 @WendyOrent @amybarnhorst It's two years right about now so we will know soon whether this one turns out that way or not.

@jwitker@Suzy4242@WendyOrent@amybarnhorst现在已经两年了，所以我们很快就会知道这一次是否会变成那样。

@jwitker @Suzy4242 @WendyOrent @amybarnhorst Of course it does. I'm in no way minimizing vaccination. My comment was with regard to the historical precedent of "Pandemics End". Yes of course they do but history says little about when or how.

@jwitker@Suzy4242@WendyOrent@amybarnhorst当然有。我绝不会减少疫苗接种。我的评论是关于“流行病终结”的历史先例。是的，他们当然知道，但历史很少说明什么时候或如何。

@jwitker @Suzy4242 @WendyOrent @amybarnhorst Having vaccines doesn't mean a lot when many don't get vaccinated.

@jwitker@Suzy4242@WendyOrent@amybarnhorst在许多人没有接种疫苗的情况下，接种疫苗并不意味着什么。

@jallepap @paul_m_orwin @baym @Bob_Wachter Europe has many more large ultradense cities. US has approximately 1.

@jallepap@paul_m_orwin@baym@Bob_Wachter欧洲有更多的超密集大城市。美国大约有1。

@Suzy4242 @WendyOrent @amybarnhorst TB is ongoing, though no longer considered pandemic in HIC, but was pandemic for most of the 19th century at least. Here is genetic evidence of a coronavirus epidemic that lasted 20000 years until people evolved immunity over many generations.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com...

@Suzy4242@WendyOrent@amybarnhorst结核病仍在继续，尽管在HIC中不再被视为大流行，但至少在19世纪的大部分时间里都是大流行。这是一种冠状病毒流行病的遗传证据，这种流行病持续了2万年，直到人们在几代人的时间里进化出免疫力。
https://www.smithsonianmag.com...

@skifter1992 @JeromeAdamsMD Pfizer and Moderna both just started testing.

@skifter1992@JeromeAdamsMD辉瑞和Moderna都刚刚开始测试。

@KRnow21 @DrSandman11 I saw video of some Auras being given out. The stockpile is a mix, and it just depends what inventory they happen to receive at a given location.

@KRnow21@DrSandman11我看到一些光环被释放的视频。库存是一个混合体，这取决于他们在指定地点碰巧收到的库存。

@randomreaction @CarolinaGirl585 @DrSandman11 Would be more concerned but this with fold type respirators than the cup type. In fact I just wouldn't do it with the former.

@CarolinaGirl585@DrSandman11的随机反应会更令人担忧，但这与罩杯式呼吸器相比，与折叠式呼吸器有关。事实上，我不会用前者。

@WendyOrent @amybarnhorst Your flawed assumption is that two different pandemics, which were/are not even the same type of virus, play out the same way. They generally don't. 1918 took a few years. Other pandemics have taken decades or centuries. "Pendemics end": Okay, sure, but not useful.

@WendyOrent@amybarnhorst你有缺陷的假设是，两种不同的大流行，甚至不是同一种病毒，以同样的方式发展。他们通常不会。1918年花了几年时间。其他大流行已经持续了几十年或几个世纪。“结束”：好的，当然，但没用。

@HFentonMudd @ruchira_s924 @fitterhappierAJ All of those are WAY down, although it is worth noting that these changes take decades.

@Hventonmudd@ruchiras924@fitterhappierAJ所有这些都在下降，尽管值得注意的是，这些变化需要几十年的时间。

@greg_travis It's also not a "divide", it is a fairly constant rate of increase across ages.

@格雷格·特拉维斯：这也不是一个“鸿沟”，而是一个相当稳定的年龄增长率。

@DrLeanaWen Why are you even bringing up the straw man of infection?
"4th dose triples protection from serious illness"
https://www.timesofisrael.com/...

@Leanawen博士你为什么要提到感染的稻草人？
“第四剂可使严重疾病的防护能力提高三倍”
https://www.timesofisrael.com/...

@notdred It's more pernicious than that. They want people less concerned about getting infected (and therefore more willing to take risks and get infected) because of available "early treatment".

@不，它比那更有害。他们希望人们不那么担心被感染（因此更愿意冒险和被感染），因为他们可以获得“早期治疗”。

@DrLeanaWen Making the exact same mistake that helped undermine 3rd doses.
Not giving 4th doses to people who would benefit and want them, does not in any way help more people get 1st, 2nd, or 3rd doses.
All it does is spread doubt about the benefit of 4th doses and undermine uptake.

@Leanawen博士犯了与破坏第三剂完全相同的错误。
不给那些希望受益的人服用第四剂，在任何方面都不能帮助更多的人获得第一剂、第二剂或第三剂。
它所做的只是传播对第四剂的益处的怀疑，并破坏吸收。

@oliverdarcy The incomplete part always seems to show a much larger disparity. I suspect correlating and reporting vaccine status takes longer.

@奥利弗·达西不完整的部分似乎总是表现出更大的差异。我怀疑关联和报告疫苗状态需要更长的时间。

@thereal_truther @MarkChangizi Elderly after 25 years? What the hell is this measuring, people who live to 100?

@25年后的thereal_truther@MarkChangizi老人？活到100岁的人，这算什么？