@jenjenkra @Mgeotsa @ApicellaCarmel @kevin_doyle @BNODesk Biden's plan also included hiring 100,000 public health workers to scale up contact tracing and vaccine outreach. That never happened. It included giving guidance to states on mitigation based on case rates, also never happened. School upgrades botched badly. Go read the plan.

@jenjenkra@Mgeotsa@ApicellaCarmel@kevin_doyle@BNODesk-Biden的计划还包括雇佣10万名公共卫生工作者来扩大接触者追踪和疫苗推广。那从未发生过。它包括根据病例率就缓解措施向各州提供指导，但也从未发生过。学校升级很糟糕。去看看计划。

@jenjenkra @Mgeotsa @ApicellaCarmel @kevin_doyle @BNODesk No, this is wrong. FDA slow-walked approval of rapid tests which made them both scarce and expensive. Federal testing sites were shut down or converted to vax sites (and then shut down). Lab test capacity was never scaled up (so every surge meant testing scarce and slow).

@jenjenkra@Mgeotsa@ApicellaCarmel@kevin_doyle@BNODesk不，这是错误的。FDA缓慢地批准了快速检测，这使得它们既稀缺又昂贵。联邦测试站点被关闭或转换为vax站点（然后关闭）。实验室测试能力从未扩大（因此每次激增都意味着测试稀缺且缓慢）。

@Tweetypot @OracleNil I just meant not in one particular place. Irregular warfare in the form of accelerating violence, in multiple places over time.
There's also DC though (not what I meant).

@Tweetypot@OracleNil我的意思是不在某个特定的地方。随着时间的推移，在多个地方以加速暴力的形式进行的非正规战争。
还有DC（不是我的意思）。

@dvs783 @EpiEllie Sorry unclear, was referring only to the last sentence.

@dvs783@EpiEllie抱歉不清楚，只是指最后一句话。

@dvs783 @EpiEllie Does not apply to this virus. People die weeks after they're done propagating.

@dvs783@EpiEllie不适用于该病毒。人们在传播完几周后死亡。

@BiggerBoomStick @michaelmina_lab It's there on a laptop too, just need different methods of accessing it.

@BiggerbomStick@michaelmina_实验室它也在笔记本电脑上，只是需要不同的访问方法。

@golfman1974 @ToshiAkima It can be, yeah. It was widely reported in the lead up to Omicron though.

@golfman1974@ToshiAkima可能是的。不过，在奥米克龙问世之前，这一点已被广泛报道。

@golfman1974 @ToshiAkima Only needed when the rest of the world is pro-virus.

@golfman1974@ToshiAkima只有在世界其他地方都是亲病毒的时候才需要。

@SheriD17536431 @MelpomeneMel Potentially.
https://www.defenseone.com/tec...

@sherid17536431@melpomenemel potentially。
https://www.defenseone.com/tec...

@EpiEllie @arthur_affect https://t.co/Qin6BHc7Gb

@EpiEllie@arthur_https://t.co/Qin6BHc7Gb

@estvoxpopuli @wsbgnl @nycsouthpaw You're missing the important point which is consistency both between studies from different organizations and over time. There is evidence that public opinion on this is stable and reasonably measured by all of these polls being consistent, and no evidence to the contrary.

@estvoxpopuli@wsbgnl@nycsouthpaw你错过了重要的一点，那就是不同组织的研究之间的一致性，以及随着时间的推移。有证据表明，公众对这一点的看法是稳定的，并且通过所有这些一致的民意调查进行了合理的衡量，没有相反的证据。

@Gab_H_R @ChristosArgyrop Only on planets where the aliens have three fingers.

@Gab_H_R@ChristosArgyrop只在外星人有三个手指的行星上。

@DailyJLee @drkomanduri @LeonidasPlatan1 @ShikhaJainMD Some things never change.

@DailyJLee@drkomanduri@LeonidasPlatan1@ShikhaJainMD有些事情永远不会改变。

@LeonidasPlatan1 You're talking about the country where an airline got to change the isolation rules for the whole country.

@Leonidasplata1你说的是一家航空公司必须改变全国隔离规定的国家。

@DailyJLee @drkomanduri @LeonidasPlatan1 @ShikhaJainMD Somewhat true. There is some reduction from booster and people who are vaxed may have booster in practice. The booster rate in both of these cities is significant. But it's not an ideal situation.

@DailyJLee@drkomanduri@LeonidasPlatan1@ShikhaJainMD有些道理。有一些减少从助推器和人谁是VAX可能有助推器在实践中。这两个城市的增长率都很高。但这不是一个理想的情况。

@Nutmeg031992 @schmangee Right, agree. What I mean though, is that Equinox can be safer just because of the people going there, even if the gym itself is physically identical risk (hypothetical). Even if you don't otherwise change your lifestyle, going to E over P may reduce your risk.

@肉豆蔻031992@schmangee对，同意。不过，我的意思是，即使健身房本身也有相同的风险（假设的），因为有人去那里，春分可能会更安全。即使你没有改变你的生活方式，去E而不是P可能会降低你的风险。

@NoyesJHumphrey @alexmeshkin @LoboGerda Is wastewater dropping?

@诺耶斯·汉弗莱@alexmeshkin@LoboGerda废水正在滴落吗？

@Nutmeg031992 @schmangee Similar though. Is that cause or effect or both, but in this case there is a direct circularity, since people at Equinox being less likely to have covid also means they are less likely to give it to you at Equinox.

@肉豆蔻031992@schmangee与之类似。这是因果关系还是两者兼而有之，但在这种情况下，有一个直接的循环，因为人们在春分时不太可能感染新冠病毒，也意味着他们在春分时不太可能感染新冠病毒。

@alexmeshkin @LoboGerda @NoyesJHumphrey I'd guess ⬆️supply of RAT, which as we know was in part intended to reduce reported testing.

@我猜是alexmeshkin@LoboGerda@NoyesHumphrey⬆️供应老鼠，正如我们所知，这在一定程度上是为了减少报告的检测。

@Nutmeg031992 @schmangee Yes it could be, or some of both.

@肉豆蔻031992@schmangee是的，可能是，或者两者兼而有之。