@IAPonomarenko I've been confused by the alleged downplaying along side training great grandmothers to fight.

@IAPonomarenko我对所谓的淡化训练曾祖母战斗的做法感到困惑。

@JohnLAlford2 @quantum_aram @PhilWMagness Sourced IFR estimates as of mid 2021: https://github.com/mbevand/cov...

@JohnLAlford2@quantum_aram@PhilWMagness来源的IFR估计值截至2021年年中：https://github.com/mbevand/cov...

@JohnLAlford2 @quantum_aram @PhilWMagness What actually happened is lockdowns and behavior changes worked reasonably well and many were spared infection prior to the availability of vaccines.

@JohnLAlford2@quantum_aram@PhilWMagness实际发生的情况是，封锁和行为改变工作得相当好，许多人在疫苗可用之前避免了感染。

@JohnLAlford2 @quantum_aram @PhilWMagness This isn't actually true. ICL estimated IFR at 0.9 (0.4-1.4%). Credible estimate of early IFR after the fact are in the range of 0.8-1.6 (UK) and 0.7-1.6 (US). CDC estimates a small number of asymptomatic cases (15%).

@JohnLAlford2@quantum_aram@PhilWMagness事实并非如此。ICL估计IFR为0.9（0.4-1.4%）。事后早期IFR的可信估计值在0.8-1.6（英国）和0.7-1.6（美国）之间。CDC估计有少量无症状病例（15%）。

@Duderichy Along with anything else.

@杜德里奇和其他人一起。

@ASlavitt @inthebubblepod @K_G_Andersen It worked so well they did it twice.

@ASlavitt@inBubblepod@K_G_Andersen他们做了两次，效果非常好。

@lisa_iannattone Yes, and likewise generally big declines for workplace, retail and recreation, and transit. How do we know how that nets out?

@lisa_iannattone是的，同样，工作场所、零售和娱乐以及交通也普遍大幅下降。我们怎么知道结果如何？

@lisa_iannattone Not sure what to make of "parks". Is going to parks for Christmas a thing?

@莉莎·伊安纳顿不知道该如何看待“公园”。去公园过圣诞节是件事吗？

@lisa_iannattone Does it? I mean increase in residential, sure, as expected, but big declines in some other categories. How to know how this nets out?

@莉莎·伊安纳通是吗？我指的是住宅的增长，当然，正如预期的那样，但在其他一些类别中，却出现了大幅下降。怎么知道这是怎么回事？

@DailyJLee @JeromeAdamsMD @HilNorth CDC has taken baby steps on "up to date" but too little too late, as usual.

@DailyJLee@JeromeAdamsMD@Hilnoth疾病预防控制中心已经采取了“最新”的初步措施，但与往常一样，太少太晚了。

@DailyJLee @JeromeAdamsMD @HilNorth Agree on latter. Always argued for "up to date".

@DailyJLee@JeromeAdamsMD@hilnoth同意后者。总是主张“最新”。

@TheLincoln Fires are contagious in cities.

@森林大火在城市中会传染。

@TheLincoln https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

@thelincolnhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news...

@JeromeAdamsMD @CoryBearor @50cent I deleted my original tweet (which also assumed you were were at the game) as it was still getting amplified.

@JeromeAdamsMD@corybeaor@50cent我删除了我原来的推文（也假设你在游戏中），因为它仍在被放大。

@DailyJLee @JeromeAdamsMD @HilNorth All true.
Also, I'm a little unsure of current testing. Lots of anecdotes of people testing negative early in course of infection during Omicron wave. Unclear how widespread or how that relates to transmission.

@DailyJLee@JeromeAdamsMD@hilnoth都是真的。
另外，我对目前的测试有点不确定。在Omicron wave期间，很多人在感染早期检测为阴性的轶事。不清楚传播的范围有多广，以及这与传播的关系如何。

@DailyJLee @JeromeAdamsMD @HilNorth It may be cover but taken at face value it does acknowledge shortcomings. If vaxes were perfect, or even generally sufficient on their own, there would be no need to test.

@DailyJLee@JeromeAdamsMD@hilnoth它可能是封面，但从表面上看，它确实承认了缺点。如果VAX是完美的，甚至基本上是足够的，就没有必要进行测试。

@itosettiMD_MBA @DrTomFrieden There's been what looks like an effort to shift the Overton window to include banning masks. Several blue checks have mentioned it. Perhaps only with the intent of getting rid of mandates and widespread masking by making that the 'moderate' position.

@itosettiMD_MBA@DrTomFrieden似乎正在努力改变奥弗顿窗口，包括禁止戴口罩。几张蓝支票都提到了这一点。也许只是为了摆脱授权和广泛的掩盖，让这成为“温和”的立场。

@DailyJLee @JeromeAdamsMD @HilNorth Vax+test might be effective, and might even be the same as what you said. At least it gets people to test. What happens from there is a function of other policies (i.e. whether there is infrastructure and support in place to trace and isolate).

@DailyJLee@JeromeAdamsMD@Hilnoth Vax+测试可能有效，甚至可能与您所说的相同。至少它能让人们进行测试。从那里发生的事情取决于其他政策（即是否有跟踪和隔离的基础设施和支持）。

@MalwareTechBlog @RayRedacted It doesn't have to be max leverage. As long as the price goes up, you can still continue to buy more. This is a function, in large part, of how many are willing to see (similar to your point earlier in thread). $1 spent may -> $2 in price rise.

@MalwareTechBlog@raydreded它不必是最大杠杆。只要价格上涨，你仍然可以继续购买更多。这在很大程度上是一个函数，它决定了有多少人愿意看到（类似于你在前面的文章中的观点）$5月1日->$2.价格上涨。

@JeromeAdamsMD @HilNorth I don't agree that pointing out leaders who can't bother to follow the rules they often expect from others is 'mask shaming'. It's hypocrisy, setting a bad example, and sending a bad message on unity.
None of these applied to you. Again apologize for misunderstanding.

@JeromeAdamsMD@hilnoth我不同意指出那些懒得遵守他们通常期望从他人那里得到的规则的领导人是“面具羞辱”。这是虚伪，树立了一个坏榜样，在团结上传递了一个坏信息。
这些都不适用于你。再次为误会道歉。