@Gab_H_R How do you spell ELE?

@Gab_H_R他怎么拼写？

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD Presymptomatic people have always been infectious for a day or so before symptoms. That's close to the most contagious period, with high measured viral load.
Asymptomatic people who just barely test positive briefly but never reach a high viral load is not the same thing.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD症状前患者在出现症状前一天左右一直具有传染性。这接近最具传染性的时期，病毒载量很高。
无症状的人只是短暂的检测呈阳性，但从未达到高病毒载量，这不是一回事。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD If the issue is transmitting to others, the most recent, and unchallenged, CDC data and guidance on community masking based on transmission (rather than filling up hospitals) says to wear a mask in your area, although just barely. When it drops below 50, then it wouldn't.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD如果这个问题正在传播给其他人，CDC最新的、未受质疑的基于传播的社区掩蔽（而不是填满医院）数据和指南说，在你的地区戴口罩，尽管只是勉强戴上。当它降到50以下时，就不会了。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD It looks "low" visually, perhaps, because it is much lower than the enormous Omicron peak. But look at the levels before Omicron, which weren't exceptionally low either, they're similar to now.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD它在视觉上看起来“低”，也许是因为它比巨大的Omicron峰低得多。但看看Omicron之前的水平，也不是特别低，它们与现在类似。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD Not sure what you're seeing that is disagreeing. 50.5/100k/7 days puts it in the CDC "substantial" category (cutoff is 50), where they have recommended universal indoor public masking based on transmission. https://t.co/J5RRuDXves

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD不确定你看到了什么不一致的地方。50.5/100k/7天将其列为CDC“实质性”类别（截止值为50），在该类别中，他们建议根据传播情况使用通用室内公共掩蔽。https://t.co/J5RRuDXves

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD It's really not subjective. There is literally no new science supporting it, and CDC didn't claim otherwise. They simply made a policy decision to stop caring about anything but managing hospital usage.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD这真的不是主观的。实际上，没有新的科学支持它，疾控中心也没有提出相反的说法。他们只是做出了一个政策决定，不再关心任何事情，只关心医院的使用。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD Unless you really do live somewhere with very little covid (unlikely, but possible), if you or your household members are out in public regularly, you're exposed whether you are aware of it or not.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD除非你真的生活在一个新冠病毒很少的地方（不太可能，但可能），如果你或你的家庭成员经常在公共场所，无论你是否意识到，你都会暴露在外。

@fmokren @CDCDirector It is the CDC community transmission map. They no longer reference it in masking recommendations but still maintain it for other purposes.
The link is here, but the page is a bit finicky, sometimes doesn't work, and sometimes only with certain browsers.
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-da...

@fmokren@CDC Director这是CDC社区传播地图。他们不再在掩蔽建议中引用它，但仍然出于其他目的保留它。
链接在这里，但页面有点挑剔，有时不起作用，有时只适用于某些浏览器。
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-da...

@NBarton @whole1day @RealSexyCyborg @DrLeanaWen @denise_dewald Walking down the street is orders of magnitude less exposure. Some societies might still want to ban but the difference in degree means the policy may also be reasonably different.

@NBarton@whole1day@RealSexyCyborg@DrLeanaWen@denise_dewald走在街上的曝光量要少几个数量级。一些社会可能仍然想要禁止，但程度上的差异意味着该政策也可能存在合理的差异。

@clarkvangilder @CorsIAQ @JimRosenthal4 Description is not really clear that you have to provide a fan.

@clarkvangilder@CorsIAQ@JimRosenthal4的描述并不清楚您是否需要提供风扇。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD I don't know where you live, but it's pretty high in most of the US. Not literally everywhere, that is true. If your area has none, congratulations.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD我不知道你们住在哪里，但在我们大多数人中这一比例相当高。事实上，并非所有地方都是如此。如果你所在的地区没有，恭喜你。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD There is no new science supporting the change in masking metrics, it was entirely arbitrary and political.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD没有新的科学支持掩蔽指标的改变，这完全是武断和政治性的。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD Your suggestion that you "would know" due to symptoms running is not consistent with the guidelines.
If exposed, the recommendation is to wear a mask around others regardless of symptoms.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD您关于您因跑步症状而“会知道”的建议与指南不一致。
如果暴露在空气中，建议在他人周围佩戴口罩，无论症状如何。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD FOR the past two years, including a month ago. Not two years ago.
We most certainly did NOT learn a lot about transmission in the past month, although the CDC did release a couple of studies supporting masks I think. Might be slightly before.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD在过去两年，包括一个月前。不到两年前。
在过去的一个月里，我们肯定没有学到很多关于传播的知识，尽管疾控中心确实发布了几项支持口罩的研究。可能是以前的事了。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD The guideline applies to known exposure, but let's face it, with current high rates of transmission, if you're out in public (or your household members are), you're probably getting exposed whether you know it or not. If not out in public, again, doesn't matter.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD该指南适用于已知的接触，但面对目前的高传播率，如果你在公共场所（或你的家庭成员在公共场所），不管你是否知道，你都可能会接触到。如果不是在公共场合，也没关系。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD CDC guidelines for two years were to wear a mask in public to avoid transmitting to others, even if not yet showing symptoms. Nothing about the virus has changed, only politics.
Current guideline is to wear a mask in public if testing positive or exposed even without symptoms.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD CDC两年来的指导方针是在公共场合戴口罩，以避免传染给他人，即使尚未出现症状。关于病毒的一切都没有改变，只有政治上的改变。
目前的指导方针是，如果检测呈阳性或暴露在公共场所，即使没有症状，也要戴口罩。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD Of course, when not in indoor public settings, it doesn't matter.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD当然，当不在室内公共环境中时，这并不重要。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD Covid is contagious before symptoms manifest or become significant. You wouldn't know.

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD新冠病毒在症状出现或变得显著之前具有传染性。你不会知道的。

@fmokren @DataDrivenMD You get a high accuracy test every single day to know?

@fmokren@DataDrivenMD你每天都会得到一个高精度的测试，你知道吗？

@drocks27 @kyle_barker @LuckyMe1950 @DataDrivenMD Chart is missing an entire year of masking and low numbers too.

@drocks27@kyle_barker@LuckyMe1950@DataDrivenMD图表也缺少整整一年的掩盖和低数字。