@JT_Grindrod More kids died from _______

@JT_Grindrod更多的孩子死于_______

@kvongoeler @drShaneLandry @beansprouts_mom @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa At population level, given Aura high fit test pass rate, this may be a good conclusion, but it doesn't necessarily provide reliable protection to any one individual.

@kvongoeler@drShaneLandry@beansprouts_mom@SimonAJoosten1@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@brosseau_lisa在人群水平上，鉴于灵气测试的高合格率，这可能是一个好结论，但它不一定能为任何一个人提供可靠的保护。

@TannisBell1 @a_longhurst I didn't initially believe that was real. But here we are.

@TannisBell1@a_longhurst我起初并不相信那是真的。但我们到了。

@stargazing90 @itshullabalulu How do you we know you get colds this way?
I don't think we know you can't, so ultimately I agree with caution.

@stargazing90@itshullabalulu你怎么知道你这样感冒？
我不认为我们知道你不能，所以最终我同意谨慎行事。

@kvongoeler @beansprouts_mom @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @drShaneLandry @brosseau_lisa Indeed, also
"both the poor fitting N95 and surgical masks were fit checked by the wearer at time of each application to ensure the best possible fit for that specific mask during each condition"

@kvongoeler@beansprouts_mom@SimonAJoosten1@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@drShaneLandry@brosseau_lisa也的确如此
“佩戴者在每次使用时都会检查不合身的N95口罩和外科口罩的合身性，以确保在每种情况下都尽可能适合该口罩。”

@wsbgnl "transition to a new lifestyle designed to prevent the spread of infections will be promoted"
CONTINUALLY ASCENDING lines showing level of preparedness and response capability also interesting vs. western yo-yo of reactive response.
https://twitter.com/GearoidRei... https://t.co/L62o3vlqBo

@wsbgnl“将促进向旨在防止感染传播的新生活方式的转变”
不断上升的线条显示了准备和反应能力的水平，与西方的反应性反应相比也很有趣。
https://twitter.com/GearoidRei... https://t.co/L62o3vlqBo

@beansprouts_mom @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @drShaneLandry @brosseau_lisa "Poor fitting N95" was defined in the paper as known to fail fit test. There is no measurement of N95s with unknown/unmeasured fit.

@beansprouts_mom@SimonAJoosten1@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@drShaneLandry@brosseau_lisa在论文中定义为“拟合不良N95”，称为不合格拟合测试。没有未知/未测量配合的N95s测量。

@KawasakiKR11 @BillHanage It was years later for the most part (apart from Wuhan+small EA waves in early 2020), but what you say is true.
Also, delay is its own merit
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@KawasakiKR11@BillHanage大部分时间都是几年后的事（除了2020年初的武汉+小EA浪潮），但你说的是真的。
此外，拖延也是它的优点
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@RadCentrism Not just CR (might imagine safety concern over self-constructed devices, whether or not valid).
Does. Not. Allow. ANY. Air Cleaners.
https://twitter.com/JennaACunn...

@RadCentrism不仅仅是CR（可能会想象对自建设备的安全担忧，无论是否有效）。
做不允许任何空气清洁器。
https://twitter.com/JennaACunn...

@KawasakiKR11 @BillHanage NZ has retained some other NPIs too. As you say, not easy.

@KawasakiKR11@BillHanage NZ也保留了一些其他NPI。正如你所说，不容易。

@KawasakiKR11 @BillHanage How does that differ from what is happening now in Shanghai? Deaths are at a meaningful rate. Seems "enough NPIs" in that environment is actually quite a lot, albeit not necessarily the right ones.

@KawasakiKR11@BillHanage这与上海目前的情况有什么不同？死亡人数正在以有意义的速度增长。在这种环境下，“足够的NPI”实际上是相当多的，尽管不一定是正确的。

@forgedcoupon @BillHanage Population age/health, vaccination, and transmission are all major factors. Vaccination takes about 20-30 years off effective age.

@人口年龄/健康、疫苗接种和传播都是主要因素。接种疫苗会使有效年龄降低20-30岁。

@BillHanage How do you suggest that be accomplished? There are enormously deep-seated reasons why elderly in some cultures are not receptive.

@BillHanage您建议如何实现这一目标？在某些文化中，老年人不善于接受的原因有很多。

@itshullabalulu 1. Individual assessment of risk and individual measures (e.g. one way masking) don't work very well. Transmission is a community-level process.
2. Some of the people you think are still taking precautions really aren't, at least not to the same degree.
3. Virus more contagious

@它的喧闹声。个人风险评估和个人措施（例如单向掩蔽）效果不佳。传播是一个社区层面的过程。
2.一些你认为仍在采取预防措施的人其实不是，至少程度不同。
3.病毒更具传染性

@MeetJess Nobody can assess risks without good data, which doesn't exist.

@MeetJess没有好的数据，任何人都无法评估风险，而这是不存在的。

@AGoldsmithEsq @alexmeshkin It may still be more sick people going for testing (even if many don't). That's a bit different from constrictions.

@AGoldsmithEsq@Alexmeskin可能还有更多的病人去做检测（即使很多人没有）。这和收缩有点不同。

@alexmeshkin @AGoldsmithEsq I was referring to so many people out sick at the same time that things break down. Testing is secondary to that.

@alexmeshkin@AGoldsmithEsq我指的是很多人在生病的同时，事情发生了变化。测试是次要的。

@FinchTH I think people would be okay with 99% protection against severe disease, both acute and chronic, but still experiencing symptoms. But reality is nowhere near that (and not clearly possible).

@芬奇：我认为99%的保护措施可以预防严重疾病，包括急性和慢性疾病，但仍有症状。但现实远没有达到这一点（而且显然不可能）。

@AGoldsmithEsq @alexmeshkin Did that happen in January? Yes and no both. Like so many things about this pandemic, ambiguous enough that everyone gets to spin how they like.

@AGoldsmithEsq@Alexmeskin这是一月份发生的吗？是和否都有。就像这场大流行的许多事情一样，模棱两可的程度足以让每个人都随心所欲。

@ryan_landay There is basically one high profile VC who hyped it and everyone else who thought they could be one of the cool kids (including the mayor, who in case anyone doesn't know is legally a "weak mayor" with no authority beyond being a cheerleader) joined in.

@ryan_landay基本上有一位高调的风投大肆宣传，其他所有人都认为自己可能是一个很酷的孩子（包括市长，以防有人不知道他在法律上是一个“软弱的市长”，除了当啦啦队长之外没有任何权力）。