@PlasticFull @robwiss For ranking, sure. Lots of formulas would do that. But it seems a poor one to me because no chance to assess useful indifference.

@PlasticFull@Robwis排名，当然。很多公式都能做到这一点。但对我来说，这似乎是一个糟糕的结果，因为没有机会评估有用的冷漠。

@PlasticFull @robwiss Yes true. However, double dBA would not be perceived as twice as loud.

@PlasticFull@robwiss是真的。然而，双dBA的声音不会被认为是原来的两倍。

@kvongoeler @beansprouts_mom @drShaneLandry @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa @HuffmanLabDU @CAPPEM2 @PPEtoheros @masknerd I think he blocked everybody. For what reason I have no idea.

@kvongoeler@beansprouts_mom@drShaneLandry@SimonAJoosten1@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@brosseau_lisa@HuffmanLabDU@CAPPEM2@PPEtoheros@masknerd我想他封锁了所有人。我不知道是什么原因。

@J_D_Klein Theorized to impair ventilation
https://twitter.com/linseymarr...

@J_D_Klein从理论上说会损害通风
https://twitter.com/linseymarr...

@J_D_Klein https://www.science.org/doi/10... https://t.co/IdNUS6wIAL

@J_D_Kleinhttps://www.science.org/doi/10...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/IdNUS6wIAL

@J_D_Klein It actually had statistically significant negative efficacy in at least one study.

@在至少一项研究中，J_D_Klein It实际上具有统计学上显著的负面效应。

@itosettiMD_MBA @FinchTH And yet look at the economic shotshow unfolding. These aren't evil geniuses, they're just evil.

@我在FinchTH开设了Timd_MBA课程，但看看正在上演的经济秀。他们不是邪恶的天才，他们只是邪恶。

@FinchTH https://foreignpolicy.com/2020...

与Finchthhttps://foreignpolicy.com/2020...

@manggirsun @dreamvioletas @medriva https://www.reuters.com/busine...

@manggirsun@dreamvioletas@medivahttps://www.reuters.com/busine...

@__philipn__ @AnitaKPatelMD I think the theory driving these takes is more or less one political consultant's (likely hasty and subjective) interpretation of a few polls.

@__philipn__@AnitaKPatelMD我认为，推动这些调查的理论或多或少是一位政治顾问（可能是仓促和主观的）对一些民意调查的解释。

@beansprouts_mom @drShaneLandry @kvongoeler @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa @HuffmanLabDU @CAPPEM2 @PPEtoheros @masknerd Not my paper, just replying since I saw the same discussion earlier.
Stay safe and healthy.

@beansprouts_mom@drShaneLandry@kvongoeler@SimonAJoosten1@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@brosseau_lisa@HuffmanLabDU@CAPPEM2@PPEtoheros@masknerd不是我的论文，只是回复，因为我之前看到了同样的讨论。
保持安全和健康。

@beansprouts_mom @drShaneLandry @kvongoeler @SimonAJoosten1 @NjbBari3 @JIDJournal @brosseau_lisa @HuffmanLabDU @CAPPEM2 @PPEtoheros @masknerd Can't ever be sure what will turn into misinformation, but this paper doesn't compare fit tested with not fit tested. It compares fit tested that passed with fit tested that failed.

@beansprouts_mom@drShaneLandry@kvongoeler@SimonAJoosten1@NjbBari3@JIDJournal@brosseau_lisa@HuffmanLabDU@CAPPEM2@PPEtoheros@masknerd永远无法确定什么会变成错误信息，但本文没有将拟合测试与未经拟合测试进行比较。它将通过测试的拟合度与失败的拟合度进行比较。

@ibrake4ants @DailyJLee @PeterHotez @Annalisa840917 Yeah okay.
https://www.reuters.com/busine...

@ibrake4ants@DailyJLee@PeterHotez@Annalisa840917是的，好的。
https://www.reuters.com/busine...

@Niederstadt1 @gardengirl778 @j_g_allen @EbenHarrell https://twitter.com/kjoules/st...

@Niederstadt1@gardengirl778@j_g_allen@EbenHarrellhttps://twitter.com/kjoules/st...

@__philipn__ @apmalong @itshullabalulu Not entirely clear but it looks like as needed to detect transmission with no mitigations:
"The choice of titre was determined by pilot sensitivity experiments with the aim of detecting a strong positive in our control condition (No PPE, no ventilation filtration)"

@__philipn__@apmalong@itshullabalulu不完全清楚，但它看起来像是在没有缓解措施的情况下检测传播所需要的：
“滴度的选择由中试敏感性实验确定，目的是在我们的对照条件下检测强阳性（无PPE，无通气过滤）”

@cactus_capital @DluLevine @greg_price11 It doesn't matter what it was caused by, it is an imbalance between supply and demand. You can't magically create more ships or ports (short term), so you can only destroy demand to try to restore a balance.

@cactus_capital@DluLevine@greg_Price 11不管是什么原因造成的，都是供需失衡。你不能神奇地创造更多的船只或港口（短期），所以你只能破坏需求，试图恢复平衡。

@albyva @SquawkCNBC @ScottGottliebMD Clear from wastewater (dark blue in graph) that reported cases (light blue in graph) less and less representative of reality as people use unreported self tests or no tests. Still not at the level of January though. https://t.co/wGYn8tyhdk

@albyva@SquawkCNBC@ScottGottliebMD从废水中清除（图中为深蓝色），报告的案例（图中为浅蓝色）越来越不具有现实代表性，因为人们使用未报告的自我测试或无测试。但仍然没有达到1月份的水平。https://t.co/wGYn8tyhdk

@mikejohansenmd @JReinerMD Despite best efforts its not ALL green.

@mikejohansenmd@JReinerMD尽管尽了最大努力，但它并不全是绿色的。

@apmalong @itshullabalulu Even with fit tested N95, virus still detectable inside nostril when aerosol concentration is high
https://twitter.com/SimonAJoos... https://t.co/PZhAr8wllU

@apmalong@itshullabalulu即使使用经fit测试的N95，当气溶胶浓度较高时，仍能在鼻孔内检测到病毒
https://twitter.com/SimonAJoos... https://t.co/PZhAr8wllU

@NobodyImpawtant @Gab_H_R It's the salty licorice.

@这是咸甘草。