@atypicalguy @linseymarr This is a good point about lower speed settings (which people use for lower noise). On high speed most cleaners blow enough to circulate room and but less clear on low.

@这是一个关于低速设置的好观点（人们使用它来降低噪音）。在高速时，大多数清洁器的风量足以使房间流通，但在低速时，清洁度较低。

@x2IndSpeculator No way they could say easing cycle, but could say pausing and data-dependent.

@X2ind投机者不能说宽松周期，但可以说暂停和依赖数据。

@tolstoybb Eggflation

@Tolstoyb蛋扁平化

@PR0GRAMMERHUM0R 0x00000000 HCF

@PR0GRAMMERHUM0R 0x00000000 HCF

@mw13606754 @ChristosArgyrop Delta not eliminated

@mw13606754@ChristosArgyrop三角洲未消除

@downey @DrJayVarma @wherewereweb4 @wsbgnl @DocJeffD To his point, if officials aren't doing their job, that ought to be protest-worthy, no?

@downey@DrJayVarma@Wherewereb4@wsbgnl@DocJeffD说到他的观点，如果官员们没有做好他们的工作，那应该是值得抗议的，不是吗？

@Nicoleb58962582 @therockett @emmagf So it turns out that convenient story is false when you measure it with mobile device tracking. https://t.co/Ug1O7yc4D7

@Nicoleb58962582@therockett@emmagf所以当你用移动设备跟踪来衡量它时，事实证明这个方便的故事是错误的。https://t.co/Ug1O7yc4D7

@therockett @emmagf That'll happen when you stop testing. https://t.co/JJj390yLT1

@therockett@emmagf当你停止测试时就会发生这种情况。https://t.co/JJj390yLT1

@JSeyff Lots of state-level tax cuts too.

@JSeyff还实施了许多州一级的减税。

@jklmd123 It is.

@是jklmd123。

@jklmd123 Biden can not. Congress can, but probably doesn't have the votes.

@jklmd123拜登不能。国会可以，但可能没有投票权。

@edyong209 Yeah okay.
2019
https://www.weforum.org/agenda... https://t.co/DLHCyaytDI

@edyong209是的，好的。
2019
https://www.weforum.org/agenda...对不起，对不起。https://t.co/DLHCyaytDI

@OmicronData And, really, just too many infections. Part of the cost of that let-it-rip may be inevitable resistance.

@OmicronData和太多的感染。让它撕裂的部分成本可能是不可避免的阻力。

@OmicronData Very true, but the question is how little can be be used without eliminating a lot of the benefit. 1-2% of infections is already pretty narrow, and likely underused, not overused, relative to benefit. Focusing on WHO is getting it likely more important than HOW MANY.

@OmicronData非常正确，但问题是，在不消除许多好处的情况下，可以使用的内容有多少。相对于效益而言，1-2%的感染已经相当有限，而且可能使用不足，而不是过度使用。关注世界卫生组织得到的可能比多少更重要。

@OmicronData The people who manage to get tested and diagnosed are probably higher risk and more in need than some 20 year old who feels invulnerable and has a sore throat. But we don't really know.

@OmicronData与20岁左右感觉无懈可击、喉咙痛的人相比，那些设法进行检测和诊断的人可能风险更高，更需要帮助。但我们真的不知道。

@OmicronData Now there is a very good question whether then 20k getting it are actually the 20k who would most benefit (as opposed to well off and well served, which perhaps 'some' risk) and that is mostly likely a very strong no (but we don't really know).

@OmicronData现在有一个很好的问题，那就是20k获得它的人是否真的是20k中受益最多的人（而不是富裕和服务周到的人，这可能“有些”风险），这很可能是一个非常强烈的否定（但我们真的不知道）。

@OmicronData 1. The number of cases is way understated, this is not even close to 12%, might be closer to 1-2%.
2. The criteria for 'high risk' are not strict. It's only in the youngest and healthiest that trial didn't show a clear benefit (but did show weak indiciation of benefit).

@OmicronData 1。病例数量被低估了，甚至不接近12%，可能接近1-2%。
2、“高风险”的标准不严格。只有在最年轻和最健康的人群中，试验才没有显示出明显的益处（但确实显示出微弱的益处迹象）。

@AbraarKaran The first one matters if you run a hospital. The second one matters to everyone else. Simple.

@AbraarKaran如果你经营一家医院，第一个问题很重要。第二个问题对其他人都很重要。易于理解的

@MishGEA Coal

@米什赫亚煤

@iksvitzer @krugermacro If he pays the $40 B then yeah, so no.

@Iksvizer@krugermacro如果他支付了400亿美元，那么是的，所以没有。