@FriedmanJas @bethechange1682 @MeetJess Breathing clean air is good for you anyway. Modern society puts a lot of crap into the air that does you know good and often does harm.

@FriedmanJas@bethechange1682@MeetJess呼吸干净的空气对你有好处。现代社会把很多垃圾抛到空中，你知道这些垃圾对你有好处，但往往是有害的。

@RidleyDM @BallouxFrancois Sort of. Severe disease is a narrow slice of symptomatic disease. You can have a large reduction in severe disease w/o much reduction in symptomatic (as now) but you can also have a large reduction in symptomatic without ANY reduction in severe.

@RidleyDM@BallouxFrancois有点像。重症是症状性疾病的一小部分。严重疾病的发病率可以大幅度降低，而症状的发病率却没有大幅度降低（就像现在一样），但症状的发病率也可以大幅度降低，而严重疾病的发病率却没有任何降低。

@trengriffin Well, how many rivers are there? If each one has a 500 flood every 500 years, how many such floods occur in a typical year globally?

@特伦格里芬嗯，有多少条河流？如果每500年发生一次500次洪水，那么全球每年有多少次这样的洪水？

@__philipn__ @BlackbirdRise @ellecreative @yaneerbaryam @farid__jalali The above chart says 40%. I don't know where these numbers come from.

@__philipn\uuuu@BlackbirdRise@ellecreative@yaneerbaryam@farid\uuuuJalali上图显示40%。我不知道这些数字是从哪里来的。

@a_toney22 @dsquareddigest @TheStalwart I see a lot of correlation there. With rare exception the third party is much more likely to stop paying rent during an economic downturn, when there will not be ample replacement tenants at the same (or any?) price, and the property value may well decline significantly as well.

@a\u toney22@dsquareddigest@TheStalwart我看到了很多相关。除了极少数例外，第三方更有可能在经济低迷期间停止支付租金，因为届时将不会有足够的替代租户（或任何？）价格和房地产价值也可能大幅下降。

@a_toney22 @dsquareddigest @TheStalwart Define uncorrelated.

@a\u toney22@dsquareddigest@TheStalwart定义不相关。

@Sophiepedia @Andy_Bloch @Walgreens I'm sure he knows that. But I did find the characterization of dropping a bit odd. It's about a 10% decline from peak, but with so much uncertainty in testing I can't consider that as significant.

@Sophiepedia@Andy\u Bloch@Walgreens我相信他知道这一点。但我确实觉得这种描述有点奇怪。这大约比峰值下降了10%，但由于测试中存在如此多的不确定性，我认为这并不重要。

@HappyFunNorm @AlanPlotzker @lawdog64 @mattyglesias White collar crime is broad but what is the objectively definable act that constitutes a crime. For drug dealing, it is the act of exchanging drugs for money. With something like this there isn't one. He talked to people, whether that is a crime depends entirely on why and how.

@HappyFunform@AlanPlotzker@lawdog64@mattyglesias白领犯罪范围很广，但客观上可定义的犯罪行为是什么。对于毒品交易来说，就是用毒品换取金钱的行为。像这样的东西就没有了。他告诉人们，这是否是犯罪完全取决于原因和方式。

@ShadyNeutron @GYamey @MelsyJ @pfizer "Clinical trial setting" = means it was being tested, nothing more.

@ShadyNeutron@GYamey@MelsyJ@辉瑞公司的“临床试验设置”=意味着它正在进行测试，仅此而已。

@AlanPlotzker @lawdog64 @HappyFunNorm @mattyglesias It has to do with the nature of the crime. The physical act of talking to people is not a crime, it only becomes a crime once it is part of an effort to accomplish illegal goals. Possession of marijuana (ignoring states decirm/legal) is not sometimes legal, sometimes not.

@AlanPlotzker@lawdog64@HappyFunform@mattyglesias这与犯罪的性质有关。与人交谈的身体行为不是犯罪，只有当它是实现非法目标努力的一部分时才成为犯罪。持有大麻（忽略州决策/法律）有时不合法，有时不合法。

@slowphotograph2 @DhruvKhullar @Bob_Wachter @ashishkjha @CorsIAQ He did mention it but that's hardly the same as doing anything about it. https://t.co/MwQ1eHqLhm

@slowphotograph2@DhruvKhullar@Bob\u Wachter@ashishkjha@CorsIAQ他确实提到了这一点，但这与做任何事情都不一样。https://t.co/MwQ1eHqLhm

@wsbgnl We have to do two things at once, by doing nothing at all.

@我们必须同时做两件事，什么都不做。

@yaneerbaryam Wow
https://twitter.com/stacyleeds...

@yaneerbaryam哇
https://twitter.com/stacyleeds...

@MelsyJ @JeffCavanagh1 @GYamey This is the "lockdown everyone" strawman again. Unless someone says so, you can't assume that their preferred policy requires any particular section of society to comply. Find out specifics first.

@MelsyJ@JeffCavanagh1@GYamey这又是“锁定所有人”的稻草人。除非有人这么说，否则你不能假设他们喜欢的政策要求社会任何特定阶层遵守。首先了解具体情况。

@MarvinH2_G2 @GYamey @MelsyJ Middle is always right, amirite?

@MarvinH2\u G2@GYamey@MelsyJ Middle总是对的，阿米丽特？

@_TradingPassion @Salec_official @Osinttechnical Try "redneck engineering"

@_TradingPassion@Salec\u official@Osintetechnical Try“redneck engineering”

@MullingMueller @danaparish I don't think the graphic is from CDC, only the text.

@MullingMueller@danaparish我不认为这张图片来自CDC，而只是文字。

@danaparish It's real in that the text is from CDC. I think someone else did the graphic.
https://twitter.com/islandofco...

@danaparish这是真实的，因为文本来自CDC。我想是别人画的。
https://twitter.com/islandofco...

@Shenaria @sullivan_larry @dj1au @EMac1957 @CKeeves It wouldn't even be true if there weren't larger droplets. N95 masks (well none of them really, aside from some shit mesh) don't work like a sieve with "holes".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

@Shenaria@sullivan\u larry@dj1au@EMac1957@CKeeves如果没有更大的液滴，这甚至都不会是真的。N95口罩（除了一些狗屎网之外，没有一个是真的）不像有“洞”的筛子那样工作。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

@caitskirby @LittleHugger You can change a setting so it reads faster (uses a little more battery)

@caitskirby@LittleHugger您可以更改设置，使其读取速度更快（使用更多电池）