@loscharlos @mattyglesias Even if he isn't impacted it's incredibly bad taste to be making jokes about people who are.

@loscharlos@mattyglesias即使他没有受到影响，也会对那些受到影响的人开玩笑。

@BJamesSlade @ampol_moment That's the only sensible advocacy given California's dumb recall system, which badly needs reform.

@BJamesSlade@ampol\u moment这是考虑到加利福尼亚州愚蠢的召回制度，唯一明智的主张，该制度急需改革。

@JoeDouglas4Prez @xTurtlePunch @libtoks @runnertyler @jstrandt @eugenegu @ianbremmer Not locking down doesn't even remotely prevent housemates from infecting either other, plenty of time spent at home regardless.

@JoeDouglas4Prez@xtortlepunch@libtoks@runnertyler@jstrandt@eugenegu@ianbremmer不上锁甚至不能远程防止室友感染其他人，不管他们在家呆了多长时间。

@JoeDouglas4Prez @xTurtlePunch @libtoks @runnertyler @jstrandt @eugenegu @ianbremmer "Most transmission within the home" just means that the average home has >2 people. Transmission has to take place between homes and that is mostly in public settings.

@JoeDouglas4Prez@xtortlepunch@libtoks@runnertyler@jstrandt@eugenegu@ianbremmer“家庭内的大多数传播”仅仅意味着平均家庭拥有>；2人。传播必须在家庭之间进行，而且主要是在公共场合。

@libtoks @xTurtlePunch @jstrandt @eugenegu @ianbremmer Over two years. Not in a few months.
"Everyone got it" is the best argument one can come up with for lockdowns, since it shows that there isn't any magic pre-existing immunity nor do you reach herd immunity with 20% infected. Its an enormous curve that must be at least flattened

@libtoks@xTurtlePunch@jstrandt@eugenegu@ianbremmer超过两年。几个月内不会。
“每个人都得到了”是锁定的最佳论据，因为它表明没有任何魔法预先存在的免疫力，也没有达到20%感染的群体免疫力。这是一条巨大的曲线，至少必须是平坦的

@AnitaSinclair14 @SocMedMofo @DFisman By applying ample amounts of hopium.

@AnitaSinclair14@SocMedMofo@DFisman，使用足量的hopium。

@dustinpeters_n @Inkling61 @fkronawitter1 @ianbremmer I'm in no way whatsoever advocating for inflation. I'm saying that IF you wanted to spend all that money, taxing to pay for it would avoid the inflation. When was the last time a war, disaster, or other crisis was paid for with taxes? Inflation is now coming home to roost.

@Dustinpiters\n@Inkling61@fkronawitter1@ianbremmer我绝不主张通货膨胀。我是说，如果你想花掉所有的钱，征税来支付可以避免通货膨胀。上一次战争、灾难或其他危机是什么时候用税收支付的？通货膨胀现在正在重蹈覆辙。

@dustinpeters_n @Inkling61 @fkronawitter1 @ianbremmer Word salad.
It used to be obvious that you pay for expensive public works with taxes. Printing out of thin air is a way to avoid the hard truth that you have to pay for it either way.
Perhaps we are in violent agreement, but with your poor writing, hard to tell.

@Dustinpiters\n@Inkling61@fkronawitter1@ianbremmer Word salad。
过去很明显，你用税收来支付昂贵的公共工程。凭空打印是一种避免你必须为此付出代价的硬事实的方法。
也许我们的意见是一致的，但与你拙劣的文字，很难说。

@dustinpeters_n @Inkling61 @fkronawitter1 @ianbremmer No, it wouldn't create more misery. The spending was the real cost. Paying for it with inflation doesn't suddenly reduce misery.

@Dustinpiters\n@Inkling61@fkronawitter1@ianbremmer不，这不会造成更多的痛苦。支出才是真正的成本。用通货膨胀来支付并不会突然减少痛苦。

@dustinpeters_n @Inkling61 @fkronawitter1 @ianbremmer You could have taxed the well off and still working (including WfH with the same income and lower expenses from no commute) to pay the benefits instead of printing. But you didn't.

@dustinpeters\n@Inkling61@fkronawitter1@ianbremmer你本可以向那些仍在工作的富人征税（包括收入相同、无通勤费用较低的WfH），以支付福利，而不是印刷。但你没有。

@DrSeaPerle @DropletsAreFake @DFisman I guess it depends on age. Later working age, yes, lots of taxes already paid, no benefits paid. Profit! Early working age is a net loss in terms of tax revenue, and also economic output.

@DrSeaPerle@DropletsAreFake@DFisman我想这取决于年龄。工作年龄晚了，是的，已经交了很多税，没有支付福利。利润早期工作年龄是税收和经济产出方面的净损失。

@WRealignment @edsuom These are additive. Comparing them as if you trade one for the other is meaningless.

@这些都是加性的。把它们进行比较，就好像用一个换另一个是没有意义的。

@edsuom Never seen any good data on how shedding in wastewater might change with different variants.

@edsuom从未看到过任何关于废水中脱落物如何随不同变体而变化的好数据。

@georgimarinov @NoyesJHumphrey @dianaberrent @Survivor_Corps I think there may be something to 3 even if not immunological. Brain inflammation increases risk taking, I think.

@georgimarinov@NoyesHumphrey@dianaberrent@Survivor\u Corps我认为可能会有一些问题，即使不是免疫性的。我认为，脑部炎症会增加冒险。

@DFisman @DrSeaPerle What do you call explicit? Consider the converse, if working-age people were dying and pensioners were unaffected. "Save the economy" would have been a different sort of rallying cry.

@DFisman@DrSeaPerle你把什么叫做显式？如果工作年龄的人正在死亡，而领取养老金的人没有受到影响，那么想想反过来。“拯救经济”将是一种不同的口号。

@georgimarinov @NoyesJHumphrey @dianaberrent @Survivor_Corps There's more to 3. It's also "I got it, who the fuck are you to think you don't need to get it"

@georgimarinov@NoyesHumphrey@dianaberrent@Survivor\u Corps还有3个。还有“我知道了，你他妈的是谁，以为你不需要得到它”

@670rv @georgimarinov @NoyesJHumphrey @dianaberrent @Survivor_Corps Frog boiling

@670rv@乔治·马里诺夫@诺耶斯·汉弗莱@迪亚纳·伯伦@幸存者军团青蛙沸腾

@georgimarinov @NoyesJHumphrey @dianaberrent @Survivor_Corps The dead are also mostly pensioners. Do the math.

@georgimarinov@NoyesHumphrey@dianaberrent@Survivor\u Corps死者也大多是养老金领取者。算算一下。

@NoyesJHumphrey @dianaberrent @Survivor_Corps 1. Having caught covid implies greater pre-existing propensity to catch covid (environment, behavior, biology)
2. Catching covid people think they have super immunity or "got it over with" so behaviorally even more likely going forward.
3. Post-covid biology?

@NoyesHumphrey@dianaberrent@Survivor\u Corps 1。捕获新冠病毒意味着更大的先前存在的捕获新冠病毒的倾向（环境、行为、生物学）
2、感染新冠病毒的人认为自己有超强的免疫力或“已经克服了”，所以行为上更可能继续下去。
3、后冠状病毒生物学？

@FinchTH @mildanalyst @MarcGozlan @C_A_Gustave @georgimarinov Is that this Georgi Marinov?
https://scholar.google.com/cit...

@FinchTH@mildanalyst@Marggozlan@C\u A\u Gustave@georgimarinov是georgimarinov吗？
https://scholar.google.com/cit...