@grankfimes @Magic14272090 @myrabatchelder @kprather88 Reliable personal protection in a dangerous environment is not the same question as more people overall wearing masks -> less virus in the air and being inhaled.
Different question different answer. But none of this means that only certain masks "work".

@granktimes@Magic14272090@myrabatchelder@kprather88在危险环境中可靠的个人防护与更多人戴口罩的问题不同->；空气中的病毒和被吸入的病毒更少。
不同的问题不同的答案。但这并不意味着只有某些面具“起作用”。

@jdumes98 @TerriGerstein How much commercial real estate do they own?

@jdumes98@TerriGerstein他们拥有多少商业地产？

@xabitron1 @Alexander_Tin @Mike_Honey_ @WHO As with much of this pandemic, complete failure of imagination. There won't be many variants -> use alphabet with 24 letters (some apparently disqualified for political reasons), no problem.

@xabitron1@Alexander_Tin@Mike_Honey_@世界卫生组织与这场大流行一样，完全没有想象力。不会有太多变体->；使用带有24个字母的字母表（有些显然因政治原因而被取消资格），没问题。

@Alexander_Tin @Mike_Honey_ @xabitron1 Getting recognition!
https://twitter.com/edyong209/...

@Alexander_Tin@Mike_Honey_u@xabitron1获得认可！
https://twitter.com/edyong209/...

@Magic14272090 @myrabatchelder @kprather88 Specifically about fit testing, there are several papers showing that people using the better N95s with reasonable fit achieve high levels of protection, many would pass a fit test if tested.

@Magic14272090@myrabatchelder@kprather88特别是关于合身测试，有几篇论文表明，使用合身性较好的N95的人可以获得高水平的保护，如果测试，许多人会通过合身测试。

@Magic14272090 @myrabatchelder @kprather88 They all work. Non-perfect masks "not working" is anti mask propaganda. Some air goes through the mask and gets filtered = less virus in air and less inhaled.
Of course better masks are better and the US could do WAY better on both comms, regulation, and supply of better masks.

@Magic14272090@myrabatchelder@kprather88它们都能工作。非完美口罩“不起作用”是反口罩宣传。一些空气通过口罩并被过滤=空气中的病毒更少，吸入更少。
当然，更好的口罩更好，美国可以在通信、监管和提供更好的口罩方面做得更好。

@BCThinkTank2 @DFisman It is. That's the smaller bump 30-70

@BCThinkTank2@DFisman就是这样。这是一个较小的凹凸30-70

@DFisman Delta wave plus US outlier on antivax/freedumb

@DFisman Delta wave加上antivax/freedumb上的US异常值

@ProfCharlesHaas @kprather88 Total cost of this is maybe $10 billion (probably less). Cost of damage to people and the economy from mass infection might be $10 billion per day, or at least some close to that.

@ProfCharlesHaas@kprather88这项技术的总成本可能为100亿美元（可能更少）。大规模感染给人们和经济造成的损失可能是每天100亿美元，或者至少接近这个数字。

@JenniferVotes @wsbgnl @kprather88 Obviously 100% true.
Also a lot of current guidance is based on vaccinated don't get infected and don't spread from 2021.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JenniferVotes@wsbgnl@kprather88显然是百分之百正确的。
此外，当前的很多指导意见都是基于接种疫苗后不会感染和从2021起不会传播。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Michael59503746 @justthefacts85 Any deviation from the script would be noteworthy. Haven't seen one.

@Michael59503746@justthefact85任何偏离脚本的地方都值得注意。还没见过。

@spwells @JamesMassard @AlisaValdesRod1 @CDCgov That carries the cost of admitting mistakes. So no.

@spwells@JamesMassard@AlisaValdesRod1@CDCgov承担承认错误的成本。所以没有。

@edyong209 Nature abhors a vacuum.

@大自然厌恶真空。

@mikejohansenmd Prediction is both in my world, but 🤷

@mikejohansenmd的预测都在我的世界里，但是🤷

@luckytran I don't think very many stores even have the masks any more.

@幸运的是，我认为没有多少商店甚至有口罩了。

@mikejohansenmd That's effectively a prediction!

@mikejohansenmd这实际上是一个预测！

@DecorumManager @wsbgnl Down since he took office, but not only up for the whole of 2021, but also up year-over-year today. One year ago daily US deaths were about 40% lower than they are now.

@wsbgnl的DecorumManager自上任以来一直在下降，但不仅在2021全年都在上升，今天也逐年上升。一年前，美国每天的死亡人数比现在减少了约40%。

@DataDrivenMD Probably dwarfed by his cut of the PPE profiteering stashed in Dubai or something.

@DataDrivenMD可能和他在迪拜或其他地方的个人防护装备暴利行为相形见绌。

@umairh They know
https://twitter.com/karpmj/sta...

@乌迈尔他们知道
https://twitter.com/karpmj/sta...

@ebattle23 @AnaCabrera @JReinerMD Yes, that's how it works.
If they got less transmissible and less immune evasive they wouldn't be able to compete with the previous variant so you'd never see it.

@ebattle23@AnaCabrera@JReinerMD是的，这就是它的工作原理。
如果它们的传染性和免疫逃避能力减弱，它们将无法与之前的变体竞争，因此你永远不会看到它。