XRP is QAnon for degens https://twitter.com/utilitythe... https://t.co/1Xu7Fay2lt

XRPhttps://twitter.com/utilitythe... https://t.co/1Xu7Fay2lt

@JohnEDeaton1 @Ripple @bgarlinghouse @chrislarsensf Of course not. That would kill Ripples only source of income if they are correct and that would harm retail consumers…which is kinda what they want to avoid.
For a lawyer you are frightfully stupid.

@当然不是。这将扼杀涟漪唯一的收入来源，如果他们是正确的，这将损害零售消费者……这是他们想要避免的。
作为一名律师，你太愚蠢了。

@HammerToe @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley You are well aware of the things I discuss here, but yet choose to argue the company line.
Paycheck gonna paycheck.

@HammerToe@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley你很清楚我在这里讨论的事情，但还是选择了公司路线。
薪水，薪水。

@HammerToe @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley What makes your position on this truly odious is that the community effort created and funded by the community to manage the UNL and operation of the network was supplanted by one funded by Ripple and puppets
Last I checked, you personally still send donations to the dead effort

@HammerToe@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley让你在这个问题上的立场真的很可恶，社区为管理UNL和网络运营而创建和资助的社区努力被Ripple和puppets资助的社区努力所取代
上次我查到你还亲自给死者捐款

@HammerToe @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley Bonus round: of those entities which manage consensus and therefore approve code changes, how many are not directly funded by Ripple or those entities Ripple funded?

@HammerToe@HaroonS98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley奖励回合：在那些管理共识并因此批准代码更改的实体中，有多少不是由Ripple直接资助的，还是由Ripple资助的？

@HammerToe @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley Has any code change been adopted which is economically and technically sound but is in opposition to the goals of Ripple, Inc.?
Just one.

@HammerToe@HaroonS98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley是否采用了任何在经济和技术上都合理但与Ripple，Inc.的目标相反的代码更改。？
就一个。

@HammerToe @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley I know you really, really want it to be a true cryptocurrency but it isn't.
That's why the entire industry has been hostile to its existence since just about day one.
It is pure theater attempting to piggyback on the success of others.
Hey, it worked for a while too.

@HammerToe@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley我知道你真的很想让它成为真正的加密货币，但它不是。
这就是为什么整个行业从一开始就对它的存在充满敌意。
这纯粹是一场试图借别人成功的戏剧。
嘿，这也奏效了一段时间。

@HammerToe @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley It doesn't have blocks nor are they in an immutable linked list.
There's like 32000 blocks or something missing from the ledger. That's not a blockchain.

@HammerToe@HaroonS98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley它没有块，也不在不可变的链表中。
账本上大概少了32000个街区。这不是区块链。

@HammerToe @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley Because if you look at the context of the actual proposals there's no discussion nor sufficient information in context to make any sort of informed decision.
It's pure theater. FOH

@HammerToe@HaroonS98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley，因为如果你看一下实际提案的背景，背景中没有讨论，也没有足够的信息来做出任何明智的决定。
这纯粹是戏剧。通行区

@HammerToe @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley LMFAO you again.
I dont need to lie about anything. I have no interest, vested or otherwise.
You would be on unemployment.
Nobody cares about your opinions.

@HammerToe@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley再次向您致意。
我什么都不需要撒谎。我没有既得利益或其他利益。
你会失业。
没人在乎你的意见。

@Blikemike2 @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @stephendpalley On a purely personal note, when I visited w/ the SEC it was standing room only. They had just about 2 dozen lawyers in the room and on a conference call to participate.
I was still treated w/ more respect and deference than I ever received by crypto.
Spoke volumes. They know.

@Blikemike2@HaroonS98022577@AriesLevy@stephendpally纯粹是出于个人考虑，当我访问SEC时，它只是一个站立的地方。他们只有大约24名律师在房间里，正在参加电话会议。
我仍然得到了加密公司前所未有的尊重和尊重。
发言量很大。他们知道。

@Blikemike2 @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @stephendpalley As one who personally and directly helped create the legal definitions used in government to describe our industry, I find that highly unlikely but stranger things have happened.

@Blikemike2@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@stephendpalley作为一个个人和直接帮助创建政府用来描述我们行业的法律定义的人，我发现发生了极不可能但奇怪的事情。

@Blikemike2 @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @stephendpalley I didn't become an expert by being correct all the time.
I became an expert from being wrong and learning why for over a decade and counting.

@Blikemike2@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@stephendpalley我并不是因为一直正确才成为专家的。
我在十多年的时间里，从错误中学习了为什么，并开始计算，从而成为了一名专家。

@Blikemike2 @HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @stephendpalley I think that's a pollyanna position, but I don't mind being wrong.
I'm not in this to prove I'm always right.
If I'm wrong then I will change my method of analysis accordingly.
However, I am quite confident I am correct.

@Blikemike2@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@stephendpalley我认为这是pollyanna的观点，但我不介意错。
我不是为了证明我总是对的。
如果我错了，我会相应地改变我的分析方法。
然而，我很有信心我是正确的。

@HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley A more valid comparison would be to those projects which have already gone through enforcement actions, such as Bitconnect.
That's what Ripple doesn't want people to look at so they cry about ETH and unfairness.

@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley一个更有效的比较应该是与那些已经采取了强制措施的项目进行比较，比如Bitconnect。
这就是Ripple不希望人们看到的，所以他们会为ETH和不公平而哭泣。

@HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley Violating securities regulations is not per se illegal activity.
That being said, it was a Swiss company so the only valid reason for US enforcement would be that they sold to US investors.
However the fact remains the issuing entity no longer exists and therefore no control

@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley违反证券法规本身并不违法。
话虽如此，这是一家瑞士公司，因此美国强制执行的唯一有效理由是将其出售给美国投资者。
然而，事实仍然是，发行实体已不存在，因此无法控制

@HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley Take a look at the UNL monitoring tools created by XLM to maintain consensus and you'll see where Ripple has been manipulating network operation since it was first launched.

@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley看看XLM为维护共识而创建的UNL监控工具，你会看到Ripple自首次推出以来一直在操纵网络运营的地方。

@HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley The market has clarity. Who does not have clarity are apparently the retail investors in XRP, which only supports the SECs reason for enforcement actions.
The XRP faithful have no idea and do not understand what they actually own.
No bueno.

@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley市场清晰。尚不清楚的显然是XRP的散户投资者，后者只支持SEC采取执法行动的理由。
XRP的忠实信徒不知道，也不明白他们实际上拥有什么。
不，布埃诺。

@HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley Not to mention, XRP existed before BTC but had no market until BTC. To claim it was created to be a more efficient BTC is simply contrary to reality.

@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley更不用说，XRP在BTC之前就存在，但在BTC之前没有市场。声称它是为了更高效的BTC而创建的，这完全违背了现实。

@HaroonS98022577 @AriesLevy @Blikemike2 @stephendpalley Actually there is, and the SEC has that information.
The XRPL has failed several times and was only brought back to life through the efforts of Ripple engineers.

@Haroons 98022577@AriesLevy@Blikemike2@stephendpalley事实上是存在的，SEC拥有这些信息。
XRPL已经失败了好几次，只有通过Ripple工程师的努力才得以恢复。