以太坊 的最新消息

@cz_binance Important to compare with realistic alternatives imo. Income and sales taxes are complex, they significantly discourage productive effort, they require heavy financial surveillance and bureaucratic legal+accounting costs, etc.

@cz_binance 与 imo 的现实替代品进行比较很重要。所得税和销售税很复杂,它们极大地阻碍了生产努力,它们需要严格的财务监督和官僚的法律会计成本等。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ArthurB I'd also argue that the investment-discouraging effect of property taxes is reduced somewhat in a context where construction is bottlenecked by bad zoning laws anyway.
(Incentive not to upgrade quality still exists, incentive not to upsize doesn't)

@ArthurB我还认为,在建筑受到不良分区法的瓶颈的情况下,房产税的投资抑制作用会有所降低。
(不升级质量的激励仍然存在,不升级的激励不存在)

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ArthurB Property taxes discourage improvements, land taxes should not (or at least discourage it only minimally, to the extent that stuff you do on your own land increases land values in the entire region)

@ArthurB 房产税不鼓励改善,土地税不应该(或者至少在最低限度上阻止它,因为你在自己的土地上做的事情会增加整个地区的土地价值)

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@schmrypto @larsiusprime most recently, but realistically many people before that

@schmrypto @larsiusprime 最近,但实际上很多人在那之前

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@nicksdjohnson Because "credibly neutral marketplaces" inherently have high positive externalities and are difficult to monetize, so forcing them to monetize (at least monetize better than the next highest bidder) reduces the chance you get something actually credibly neutral.

@nicksdjohnson 因为“可信中立的市场”本质上具有很高的正外部性并且难以货币化,所以强迫它们货币化(至少比下一个最高出价者更好地货币化)会降低你获得真正中立的东西的机会。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@nicksdjohnson You responded too quickly 😛
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@nicksdjohnson One of the conditions being that >50% of the revenue of the marketplace should go back to the ENS DAO.
In the long term, this approach may well generate much more lasting and scalable revenue for the ENS DAO than one-time sales!

发表时间:3年前 作者:vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin

@nicksdjohnson 你反应太快了😛
https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

@nicksdjohnson 条件之一是

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@nicksdjohnson One of the conditions being that >50% of the revenue of the marketplace should go back to the ENS DAO.
In the long term, this approach may well generate much more lasting and scalable revenue for the ENS DAO than one-time sales!

@nicksdjohnson 条件之一是

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@nicksdjohnson I still prefer the approach where the ENS DAO takes a heavier hand and intentionally hands out 1-2 letter subdomains to projects that are good-faith attempts to create credibly neutral marketplaces.

@nicksdjohnson 我仍然更喜欢 ENS DAO 采取更重手并有意将 1-2 个字母的子域分发给善意尝试创建可信中立市场的项目的方法。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

One thing that people don't appreciate enough about land taxes (and even property taxes) is that the existence of the tax means the property is much cheaper for you to acquire in the first place. You can put the difference into stocks and pay the tax out of the price gains.

人们对土地税(甚至财产税)不够重视的一件事是,税收的存在意味着您首先获得的财产要便宜得多。您可以将差价存入股票并从价格收益中缴纳税款。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@LilNonfungible @nicksdjohnson Oh I'd be happy to pay a $640/year renewal fee on it.

@LilNonfungible @nicksdjohnson 哦,我很乐意为此支付 640 美元/年的续订费。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@nicksdjohnson Isn't the Harberger registrar idea exactly backwards in some sense though? The whole point is to experiment with Harbergering (or, in my other example, adding a trademark court to) subdomains, not to do that with the top-level domain and keep subdomains immutable.

@nicksdjohnson Harberger 注册商的想法在某种意义上不是完全倒退了吗?重点是尝试使用 Harbergering(或者,在我的另一个示例中,向子域添加商标法院),而不是对顶级域执行此操作并保持子域不可变。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@ChristoSavaides @AlecStapp And perhaps more importantly, drastic social status restructuring.

@ChristoSavaides @AlecStapp 也许更重要的是,剧烈的社会地位重组。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

RT: @Noahpinion Using climate as an "opportunity" to go after people with the wrong vibez is harmful to the cause of mitigating climate change.

RT:@Noahpinion 将气候作为“机会”来追捕有错误情绪的人,这对缓解气候变化的事业是有害的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@Noahpinion Using climate as an "opportunity" to go after people with the wrong vibez is harmful to the cause of mitigating climate change.

@Noahpinion 将气候作为“机会”来追捕有错误情绪的人,这对缓解气候变化的事业是有害的。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@nir_III @js_horne Yeah my thesis is different, it's that we desperately need more sustainable long-term public goods funding streams. I would *love* it if the @ensdomains DAO could one day match the uniswap DAO in ecosystem funding capacity.

@nir_III @js_horne 是的,我的论点不同,我们迫切需要更可持续的长期公共产品资金流。如果@ensdomains DAO 有朝一日能够在生态系统融资能力方面与 uniswap DAO 相匹配,我会*喜欢*它。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@MoonRabbit1396 @5459_eth Actually I woke up at 4am today.

@MoonRabbit1396 @5459_eth 实际上我今天凌晨 4 点就醒了。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@5459_eth lol I've been tweeting and blogging about random irrelevant stuff since like 2014

@5459_eth 哈哈,自 2014 年以来,我一直在发推特和博客关于随机无关的东西

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情

@gladstein @NeerajKA @jevidon @taha_crypto1 @Bquittem @pourteaux @ErikVoorhees I mean you're not gonna get me to vocally support PoW for the same reason I'm not gonna get bitcoiners to vocally support the legitimacy of premines.
The crypto space is diverse that that's a great thing, no need to pretend to have unified positions on things.

@gladstein @NeerajKA @jevidon @taha_crypto1 @Bquittem @pourteaux @ErikVoorhees 我的意思是你不会让我口头支持 PoW,原因与我不会让比特币人口头支持 premines 的合法性一样。
加密空间是多样化的,这是一件很棒的事情,不需要假装对事物有统一的立场。

发表时间:3年前 作者:Vitalik Non-giver of Ether @VitalikButerin详情