@TrustlessState guy

@TrustlessState 家伙

@bengrossbg Some people have this weird opinion that because "anything to the power of zero is one, but zero to the power of anything is zero", 0^0 must be ambiguous, but the latter is clearly not even true: take 0^-3 for example

@bengrossbg 有些人有这种奇怪的观点，因为“任何零次方都是一，但零次方是零”，0^0 肯定是模棱两可的，但后者显然不是真的：取 0^ -3 例如

@bengrossbg @upzone_CA So if `p = 0` you just always get 1.

@bengrossbg @upzone_CA 所以如果`p = 0`你总是得到1。

@bengrossbg @upzone_CA The most natural way to define exponentiation `x^p` for non-negative integer `p` is to start with 1, and then repeat `p` times the procedure of replacing the output with `x` times the output.

@bengrossbg @upzone_CA 为非负整数`p`定义幂`x^p`最自然的方法是从1开始，然后重复`p`次用`x`替换输出的过程乘以输出.

@bengrossbg X^0 equals 1 for 0 too.

@bengrossbg X^0 也等于 0 的 1。

@matthew_d_green Oh no it's not, I don't think you've ever offended me

@matthew_d_green 哦不，不是，我不认为你曾经冒犯过我

@hudsonjameson > original leadership turnover that leaves open room for inadequate or self-interested individuals to fill the gaps
"the succession problem" ☺️

@hudsonjameson

@pourteaux I just instinctively call it mainland (same with non-UK Europe for that matter) because I've spent too much time in Asia.

@pourteaux 我只是本能地将其称为大陆（与非英国欧洲相同），因为我在亚洲度过了太多时间。

The main exception is of course that if you find someone who has this vibe, and they accidentally demonstrate a big and relevant error in domain knowledge themselves, then it's okay to flip over your own domain expertise cards as part of exposing their hypocrisy.

当然，主要的例外是，如果您发现有人具有这种​​氛围，并且他们自己不小心在领域知识方面表现出重大且相关的错误，那么可以翻转您自己的领域专业知识卡作为揭露他们虚伪的一部分。

@jaypinho lolwat
"The Laffer curve exists" and "we are currently on the right side of the Laffer curve" are two very very different statements.

@jaypinho lolwat
“存在拉弗曲线”和“我们目前处于拉弗曲线的右侧”是两种截然不同的说法。

People whose primary vibe is "I and my tribe are domain-expertise-endowed professionals, the people I criticize and mock are amateurs, and you should shut up" are really really uncool, and people should recognize the pattern and immediately unfollow anyone who exhibits it.

以“我和我的部落是领域专长的专业人士，我批评和嘲笑的人是业余爱好者，你应该闭嘴”为主要氛围的人真的很不酷，人们应该认识到这种模式并立即取消关注任何表现出来的人它。

DAOs are not corporations: where decentralization in autonomous organizations matters
https://vitalik.eth.limo/gener...

DAO 不是公司：自治组织的去中心化很重要
https://vitalik.eth.limo/gener...

RT: “it’s a politically meaningful act to have a personal website”

RT：“拥有个人网站是一种具有政治意义的行为”

@MuKappa @KyivPost @cryptodrftng Yeah this was from @cryptodrftng

@MuKappa @KyivPost @cryptodrftng 是的，这是来自@cryptodrftng

@danfinlay That got rejected because of complexity concerns. Tx-wide context variables existed already so it was easy to add one more, block-wide context variables do not.

@danfinlay 由于复杂性问题而被拒绝。 Tx 范围的上下文变量已经存在，因此很容易再添加一个，块范围的上下文变量没有。

@JamiedaConquest Gm1m2/r^2

@JamiedaConquest Gm1m2/r^2

I try to explain the additive vs multiplicative notation issue for elliptic curves, and get a little bit into the question of what to do with the GT group. https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

我尝试解释椭圆曲线的加法与乘法符号问题，并稍微探讨一下如何处理 GT 组的问题。 https://twitter.com/VitalikBut...

It's also the anniversary of the 2016 Shanghai DoS attacks. https://twitter.com/depthsofwi...

这也是 2016 年上海 DoS 攻击的周年纪念日。 https://twitter.com/depthsofwi...

@davidonchain H is already pronounced "aych"; if you want to go lobby to rename it "huh" (and W to "we" or "wuh") I'll support you, but I'm trying to start with the low hanging fruit here first.

@davidonchain H 已经发音为“aych”；如果你想去大厅把它重命名为“huh”（并将 W 改成“we”或“wuh”），我会支持你，但我想先从这里容易实现的目标开始。

@Galois_Capital @TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson That doesn't work because ⚬ is commutative and exponentiation is not.
I recommend you go take first year linear algebra or some coursera equivalent before you argue big boy topics with us any more.

@Galois_Capital @TrustlessState @ArthurB @danrobinson 这不起作用，因为 ⚬ 是可交换的，而取幂不是。
我建议您在与我们再争论大男孩话题之前，先去学习第一年的线性代数或类似的课程。