RT: In addition to @Reddit, we've given over 100 developer teams early access to the chain as part of our continued commitment to fair launches.
Other notable teams buidling on Nova include @SushiSwap, @MakerDAO, and @FTX_official who will be providing direct on-boarding onto Nova.
RT：除了@Reddit，我们还为 100 多个开发团队提供了早期访问该链的机会，这是我们对公平发布的持续承诺的一部分。
其他在 Nova 上建立的著名团队包括 @SushiSwap、@MakerDAO 和 @FTX_official，他们将提供直接加入 Nova 的服务。
Dai on Optimism 👀
From 30 million to 140 million in 5 days. https://t.co/AQlNWvX6c9
戴乐观👀
5天从3000万到1.4亿。 https://t.co/AQlNWvX6c9
The next participants in the top 3 places where the most DAI is currently held are:
• DEX (Liquidity pools): 21.6%
• Lending: 10.9%
• Bridges: 6.2%
目前持有 DAI 最多的前 3 个地方的下一个参与者是：
• DEX（流动性池）：21.6%
• 贷款：10.9%
• 桥梁：6.2%
~50% of all DAI in circulation is currently held in externally owned accounts (EOAs).
What that means is that ~50% of all DAI is held in users' Ethereum wallets.
This metric has been on the rise over the last two years, with DAI's supply increasing by +1,600%. https://t.co/cjmoRJ8dm4
目前流通中的所有 DAI 中约有 50% 存放在外部账户 (EOA) 中。
这意味着大约 50% 的 DAI 保存在用户的以太坊钱包中。
该指标在过去两年中一直在上升，DAI 的供应量增加了 1,600%。 https://t.co/cjmoRJ8dm4
@Anchorage You can learn more about @Anchorage by reading their latest report on Maker Governance!
👇
https://www.anchorage.com/mark...
7/
@Anchorage 您可以通过阅读他们关于 Maker Governance 的最新报告了解更多关于 @Anchorage 的信息！
👇
https://www.anchorage.com/mark...
7/
@Anchorage 🗳 Delegating voting power.
When delegating MKR, the tokens never leave the custody of Anchorage.
However, funds are temporarily locked while they are being delegated and remain locked until you choose to undelegate them.
6/
@Anchorage 🗳 委派投票权。
在委托 MKR 时，代币永远不会离开安克雷奇的保管。
但是，资金在委派期间会暂时锁定，并保持锁定状态，直到您选择取消委派为止。
6/
@Anchorage Anchorage Governance is directly integrated with Maker Governance voting contracts.
Both the voting key and the asset key are protected to the same high standard of security.
5/
@Anchorage Anchorage Governance 直接与 Maker Governance 投票合约集成。
投票密钥和资产密钥都受到同样高标准的安全保护。
5/
@Anchorage 🗳 Voting with your MKR.
First, lock your tokens in Maker Governance's voting contract to contribute to your voting power.
Once the MKR is locked, you’ll be able to view the proposals that are currently in progress.
4/
@Anchorage 🗳 用你的 MKR 投票。
首先，将您的代币锁定在 Maker Governance 的投票合约中，以增加您的投票权。
锁定 MKR 后，您将能够查看当前正在进行的提案。
4/
@Anchorage Anchorage removes the use of unnecessary proxies to protect the integrity of MKR holders' voting keys.
This approach reduces smart contract risk and avoids exposing sensitive voting keys in insecure hot wallet environments.
3/
@Anchorage Anchorage 消除了使用不必要的代理来保护 MKR 持有者投票密钥的完整性。
这种方法降低了智能合约风险并避免在不安全的热钱包环境中暴露敏感的投票密钥。
3/
@Anchorage Through Anchorage, users can participate in Maker Governance in two ways:
• Direct voting in Governance Polls and Executive Votes with MKR tokens held in Anchorage custody.
• Delegating voting power to another address through the MakerDAO Delegation model.
2/
@Anchorage 通过 Anchorage，用户可以通过两种方式参与 Maker 治理：
• 使用安克雷奇托管的 MKR 代币在治理民意调查和执行投票中直接投票。
• 通过 MakerDAO 委托模型将投票权委托给另一个地址。
2/
At MakerDAO, we believe in decentralized governance solutions that aim to scale and make participation accessible to everyone.
@Anchorage has been building a big part of this future of governance that we envision.
Let's see how.
🧵
1/
在 MakerDAO，我们相信去中心化治理解决方案旨在扩大规模并使每个人都能参与。
@Anchorage 一直在构建我们设想的治理未来的重要组成部分。
让我们看看如何。
🧵
1/
Responses:
• Share information about replay attack risk within Maker community.
• Advocate for PoW forked chain to use alternative chain ID to avoid replaying transactions.
23/
回应：
• 在 Maker 社区内共享有关重放攻击风险的信息。
• 提倡PoW 分叉链使用替代链ID 以避免重放交易。
23/
Impacts for Maker:
• Increased possibility of unintended transactions on mainnet, replayed from PoW forked chain.
• Possibility of mainnet transactions, including Maker oracle and keeper operations, being replayed to PoW forked chain.
22/
对 Maker 的影响：
• 主网上发生意外交易的可能性增加，从 PoW 分叉链重播。
• 主网交易（包括Maker oracle 和keeper 操作）被重播到PoW 分叉链的可能性。
22/
EIP-155 adds chain ID as a transaction signature parameter, but there is no guarantee that a PoW forked chain would adtop a different chain ID from mainnet.
If the chain ID is the same, transactions intended for mainnet or forked chain could be replayed on the other chain.
21/
EIP-155 添加链 ID 作为交易签名参数，但不能保证 PoW 分叉链会添加与主网不同的链 ID。
如果链 ID 相同，则用于主网或分叉链的交易可以在另一条链上重放。
21/
4️⃣ Replay Attacks
Users may fall victim to so-called "replay attacks."
Replay attacsk allow for a transaction or message signed on one chain to be "replayed" on another chain in certain cases.
20/
4️⃣ 重放攻击
用户可能会成为所谓的“重放攻击”的受害者。
在某些情况下，重放攻击允许在一条链上签名的交易或消息在另一条链上“重放”。
20/
Responses:
• Consider parameter changes to increase safety on vault positions.
• Encourage users to increase their own margin of safety against liquidations in the lead up to merge upgrade.
19/
回应：
• 考虑更改参数以提高保险库位置的安全性。
• 鼓励用户在合并升级前增加自己对抗清算的安全边际。
19/
Impacts for Maker:
• Increased risk of downtime and liveness faults around time of the PoS Merge
• Possibility of negative price gaps during any network downtime
• Reduced ability for users to deleverage or defend their vault positions
18/
对 Maker 的影响：
• 在 PoS 合并期间，停机和活动故障的风险增加
• 在任何网络停机期间可能出现负价差
• 用户去杠杆化或保护其金库头寸的能力降低
18/
The risk of downtime or liveness failures is low, but it is surely higher than during standard Ethereum operations.
16/
停机或活动失败的风险很低，但肯定高于标准以太坊操作期间的风险。
16/
Additionally, certain service providers or custodians could still face downtime.
This could interfere with market liquidity conditions or users’ ability to interact with the Maker Protocol.
17/
此外，某些服务提供商或托管人仍可能面临停机。
这可能会干扰市场流动性条件或用户与 Maker 协议交互的能力。
17/
3️⃣ Network Downtime
The Merge has technical fault risks that could cause liveness failures and unavailability.
If Ethereum goes down for a period of time, Maker could experience discontinuous price drops in collaterals that could push vaults into liquidation or insolvency
15/
3️⃣ 网络停机
Merge 存在技术故障风险，可能导致活动失败和不可用。
如果以太坊下跌一段时间，Maker 可能会经历抵押品价格的不连续下跌，这可能会将金库推向清算或破产
15/