用户 Curve(@ CurveFinance) 的最新消息

@L0RDGIV [α] In reality - it's the most optimal strategy. If no one takes the bribe - you get it back

@L0RDGIV[α]实际上,这是最理想的策略。如果没有人收受贿赂,你就把它拿回来

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

👀 https://bribe.crv.finance/ https://t.co/l1PcZ7xBen

👀 https://bribe.crv.finance/ https://t.co/l1PcZ7xBen

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@jmfrapat @DegenSpartan Uhm... Do screenshots of ve(3,3) NFTs allow for tax loss harvesting?
// bad ideas only

@jmfrapat@DegenSpartan Uhm。。。ve(3,3)NFT的屏幕截图是否允许税收损失收获?
//只有坏主意

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@_supercycled Should there be a ve index ser?

@_超级循环是否应该有一个ve索引?

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@DegenMaxi @TrustlessState @BanklessHQ @danielesesta @MIM_Spell 👀

@DegenMaxi@TrustlessState@bankleshq@danielesesta@MIM或拼写👀

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

Votes for $SPELL / $ETH and $T / $ETH pools are up on https://dao.curve.fi/dao!

$Spill/$ETH和$T/$ETH池的投票在https://dao.curve.fi/dao!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@CurveCap @WormholeOracle @_bout3fiddy_ @amadeobrands The vote result mentioned isn't in yet - still can be flipped!

@CurveCap@WormholeOracle@u bout3fiddy@amadeobrands提到的投票结果还没有出来-仍然可以翻转!

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: Earn a net 20% APR on stablecoins, with deposits insured
1⃣ Deposit MIM, DAI, USDC, USDT on @CurveFinance: https://curve.fi/mim/deposit
2⃣ Stake the Curve LP on @ConvexFinance: https://convexfinance.com/stak...
3⃣ Buy @NexusMutual cover for min of 30 days at ~1.35% APR: https://app.nexusmutual.io/cov... https://twitter.com/HughKarp/s... https://t.co/kGHFVlaNbH

转发:stablecoins的净APR为20%,存款已投保
1⃣ MIM、DAI、USDC、USDT在@CurveFinance上的存款:https://curve.fi/mim/deposit
2⃣ 将曲线LP标在@ConvexFinance上:https://convexfinance.com/stak...
三⃣ 购买@NexusMutual保险,最短30天,4月~1.35%https://app.nexusmutual.io/cov... https://twitter.com/HughKarp/s... https://t.co/kGHFVlaNbH

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0xArkham @CFrogE1 @bankless Gotta thank DPI for not including CRV. It worked well

@0xArkham@CFrogE1@bankless必须感谢DPI没有包括CRV。它工作得很好

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@CFrogE1 @bankless Maybe this explains https://twitter.com/inversebra...

Brainless https://t.co/vOm2hVSrnx

发表时间:2年前 作者:starbust @inversebrah

@CFrogE1@bankless也许这可以解释https://twitter.com/inversebra...

没脑子。https://t.co/vOm2hVSrnx

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@gerhard7x @CFrogE1 Some people swap directly on Sushi and get rekt (and when liquidity goes down - the number of those people doesn't go down as fast).
Though for small quantities it does make sense to do due to lower gas for simpler logic, but most of that volume is likely not that

@gerhard7x@CFrogE1一些人直接在寿司上进行交换,然后获得rekt(当流动性下降时,这些人的数量下降得并不快)。
虽然对于少量的气体来说,为了更简单的逻辑,这样做是有意义的,但大部分的体积可能不是这样

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@bobreideverest @twobitidiot It is impossible to change what is “written” on chain, even with governance. The only way is to do those checks at redemption (of stablecoins for example).
Blockchains are incredibly non anon, and it’s easy to figure who is who

@bobreideverest@twobitidiot即使使用治理,也不可能改变链上“写”的内容。唯一的方法是在赎回时进行这些检查(例如stablecoins)。
区块链是难以置信的非anon,很容易判断谁是谁

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@bobreideverest @twobitidiot This future is not coming to DEXes.

@bobreideverest@twobitidiot这个未来不会降临到德克斯身上。

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0xAlunara @CurveCap @DefiLlama 👀

@0xAlunara@CurveCap@DefiLlama👀

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@crypto_vnr That's most likely a problem with either your wallet or gas on Polygon chain. Try to bump gas of the transaction

@加密最有可能是你的钱包或多边形链上的汽油的问题。设法使交易顺利进行

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0x_cookie @0xAlunara *gauge weight votes were split

@0x_cookie@0xAlunara*计量重量投票被分割

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0x_cookie @0xAlunara But that doesn't affect bribing, it was already split 👀

@0x_cookie@0xAlunara但这并不影响贿赂,它已经被拆分了👀

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

After Convex adding the yes/no vote split, looks like a narrow race on this vote: not clear if "yes" or "no" wins!
Voters most likely represent their concerns about not seeing wormhole bridge audit yet. Likely to get revoted after the audit is public and studied. https://t.co/7DaDYo79E2

在加上赞成/反对票之后,这次投票看起来像是一场狭隘的竞争:不清楚“是”还是“否”获胜!
选民最有可能表达他们对尚未看到虫洞桥审计的担忧。在审计公开和研究后,可能会被撤销。https://t.co/7DaDYo79E2

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@turbotutur What’s that?

@turbotutur那是什么?

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@Tepper83 @ShardiB2 Better because of log scale. Log scale is always good

@Tepper83@ShardiB2由于对数比例更好。对数刻度总是好的

发表时间:2年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情