@jayks17 @Platypusdefi If anything: red color means that you don't have $50M in your wallet
@jayks17@Platypusdefi如果有的话：红色意味着你的钱包里没有5000万美元
用户 Curve(@ CurveFinance) 的最新消息
@DefiDividends @DefiMoon Yes, that kept updating correctly
@是的，它一直在正确更新
@DefiDividends @DefiMoon Still not there. Even opening in private browsing doesn't help
@我的月亮仍然不在那里。即使在私人浏览中打开也无济于事
@DefiDividends @DefiMoon Uhm... Aggregate graph is still not up to date at the moment
@DefiMoon@DefiMoon嗯。。。聚合图目前仍然不是最新的
@DefiDrew @Platypusdefi That's not a bad way. Not sure if it gains much in comparison, but @synthetix_io was the first to explore this model (gotta give a tribute to those who did it first!)
@defidraw@Platypusdefi这不是一个坏方法。不确定相比之下它是否获得了很多好处，但是@synthetix_io是第一个探索这个模型的人（首先要向那些最先开发它的人致敬！）
@MrBeaverTail @lemiscate Looks more or less like Shell protocol but with Chainlink
@MrBeaverTail@lemiscate看起来或多或少像Shell协议，但带有Chainlink
@yearnhr @bantg Ohshi, what happened? Did he forget to add a waifu picture when opening a pull request again?
@bantg Ohshi，发生了什么事？再次打开拉取请求时，他是否忘记添加外福图片？
@Mudit__Gupta Try Ledger + Frame + Chrome. Not flawless but overall feels better
@Mudit_uuuGupta试试账本+框架+镀铬。并非完美无瑕，但总体感觉更好
@lemiscate Indeed. Looks like absolutely no details about how the swap works and, hence, unclear why would it be any better: just marketing materials.
Probably should wait and see
@确实是这样。看起来完全没有关于互换如何运作的细节，因此不清楚为什么会更好：只是营销材料。
也许我们应该拭目以待
@addingdigitz @0xCha0s One consideration though is that vlCVX can unlock much earlier
@添加digitz@0xCha0s一个考虑因素是vlCVX可以更早解锁
RT: $SPELL / $ETH and $T / $ETH pools now available on https://convexfinance.com/stak... ! https://twitter.com/CurveFinan... https://t.co/ql4nDCNJGc
转发：$Spell/$eth and$t/$eth pools now available onhttps://convexfinance.com/stak...我不知道。https://twitter.com/CurveFinan... https://t.co/ql4nDCNJGc
@DefiMoon @AaveAave Just to say though, veCRV gives somewhat more voting power than vlCVX at current prices
@DefiMoon@aaveave只是想说，以目前的价格，veCRV比vlCVX有更多的投票权
@UniDexFinance @paraswap Changes over time, but hey, this is a very nice comparison ui!
@UniDexFinance@paraswap会随着时间的推移而变化，但嘿，这是一个非常好的比较ui！
@MagadaReshi Yes, checked what it was.
Someone seemingly wrote a zap (unverified on polygonscan) to unstake and withdraw in one transaction. They forgot to check the slippage when using it though, so they got rekt by their own contract.
Arbitrage made money on the mistake, other LPs too
@MagadaReshi是的，检查了是什么。
似乎有人写了一个zap（未在polygonscan上验证）在一次交易中取消并撤销。不过，他们在使用滑梯时忘了检查滑梯，所以他们根据自己的合同得到了rekt。
套利在这个错误上赚钱，其他LP也一样
@SmaugZeDragon @mozilla Well shit :-(
@SmaugZeDragon@mozilla Well屎：-(
CRV for new pools arrived https://t.co/9xnExjA8Cs
新游泳池的CRV到达https://t.co/9xnExjA8Cs
@ToTheLoom @statelayer @bantg Hmm, yes, not too small. Surprising that aggregators show such a big slippage
@ToTheLoom@statelayer@bantg嗯，是的，不太小。令人惊讶的是，聚合器显示出如此大的滑动
@statelayer @bantg Darn, FXS liquidity on chain is really tiny... Good candidate to be the first pool in v2 factory?
@statelayer@bantg Darn，FXS链上的流动性非常小。。。成为v2工厂第一个人才库的好人选？