用户 Curve(@ CurveFinance) 的最新消息

We have found that some of cryptopool fees were not converted. The fix requires this vote.
The fix will increase the revenues as well as allow to distribute the "lost" fees worth $4M to veCRV on Thursday next week.
https://gov.curve.fi/t/cip-191...
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...

我们发现一些加密池费用没有转换。修复需要此投票。
修复将增加收入,并允许在下周周四将价值400万美元的“损失”费用分配给veCRV。
https://gov.curve.fi/t/cip-191...
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@lemiscate Defi people location today is.. decentralized

@lemiscate Defi people今天的位置是。。分散式

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: 1N/: Table below, step by step walkthrough as follows.
Source: @tokenterminal, @CurveFinance https://twitter.com/0xroborosC... https://t.co/Nc2CbGKv3I

转发:1N/:下表,逐步演练如下。
来源:@tokenterminal,@CurveFinancehttps://twitter.com/0xroborosC... https://t.co/Nc2CbGKv3I

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@WormholeOracle @napgener @synthetix_io @kaiynne @newmichwill Perhaps they mean that A should be decreased for synthetix safety if pools grow bigger

@WormholeOracle@napgener@synthetix\u io@Kaiyne@newmichwill也许他们的意思是,如果池变大,为了synthetix的安全,应该减少A

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@lex_node But what if there is no single party responsible for the asset? If it cannot be controlled?

@lex\u节点,但如果没有一方对资产负责,该怎么办?如果无法控制?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@napgener @tomhschmidt @dragonfly_cap @synthetix_io Rebirth of synthetix on mainnet!

@napgener@tomhschmidt@dragonfly\u cap@synthetix\u io synthetix在mainnet上重生!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@napgener @synthetix_io @kaiynne @newmichwill The price shift will end where the traders think it should be. You cannot make someone pay higher price than they wish! Decreasing A will probably decrease the trade size, and the arb price shift will end up being same

@napgener@synthetix\u io@Kaiyne@newmichwill价格变动将在交易员认为应该的地方结束。你不能让别人付出比他们希望的更高的代价!减少A可能会减少交易规模,而arb的价格变化最终将是相同的

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@napgener @synthetix_io @kaiynne @newmichwill Not getting why though. If you decrease A - slippage grows and trading volume decreases? Please enlighten - sounds very interesting

@napgener@synthetix\u io@Kaiyne@newmichwill不知道为什么。如果你减少A-下滑增加,交易量减少?请启发-听起来很有趣

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@DefiMoon Or did you count post-trade arbitrage?

@DefiMoon还是你计算过交易后套利?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@napgener @synthetix_io @kaiynne @newmichwill Isn’t it $2 of our volume though?

@napgener@synthetix\u io@Kaiyne@newmichwill这不是我们销售额的2美元吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@DefiMoon This also relies on chainlink price under the hood, and 1inch drives most volume. Permissionless collab!

@DefiMoon这还依赖于引擎盖下的链接价格,1英寸驱动了最大的容量。无权限合作!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@FAbd26182964 @ChrisBlec Ours for example

@例如,FAbd26182964@ChrisBlec-Ours

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0xroborosCap @CurveCap @crypto_condom That's some interesting research now!

@0xroborosCap@CurveCap@crypto\u安全套现在是一些有趣的研究!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: Updated the below with data from Dune instead thanks to @crypto_condom giving me a heads up on TT's data potentially undercounting $CRV revenue. The $CRV fee data from Dune pulls directly from the Fee Distributor contract.
https://dune.com/queries/92155... https://twitter.com/0xroborosC... https://t.co/aeN1pxFUa1

RT:用Dune的数据更新了以下内容,这要感谢@crypto\u避孕套让我了解到TT的数据可能低估了CRV收入。Dune提供的$CRV费用数据直接来自费用分销商合同。
https://dune.com/queries/92155... https://twitter.com/0xroborosC... https://t.co/aeN1pxFUa1

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

RT: ✨10 Milly CRV✨
🙌 to the Herd, the team and @CurveFinance OG's
🦙🐘🦙🐘
https://lockers.stakedao.org/ https://t.co/Zr2QwzpIOF

转发:✨10百万CRV✨
🙌 为了群体、团队和@CurveFinance OG's
🦙🐘🦙🐘
https://lockers.stakedao.org/ https://t.co/Zr2QwzpIOF

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@0xroborosCap Good death spiraling 👍

@0xroborosCap良性死亡螺旋上升👍

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@mindaoyang @forgivenever @xzjcool @BNBCHAIN You can deploy from ui yourself, no need to ask anyone. Just mouse-click!

@mindaoyang@宽恕者@xzjcool@BNBCHAIN您可以自己从ui部署,无需询问任何人。只需单击鼠标!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@numerium3 @StaniKulechov Ahhh riiight!

@StaniKulechov Ahhh RIGHT数字3!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@StaniKulechov Absolutely agree. Better to make it impossible even by governance though because tvl is typically much higher than value of tokens necessary to vote

@StaniKulechov完全同意。尽管如此,最好通过治理使其不可能实现,因为tvl通常比投票所需的令牌价值高得多

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情

@drtomato1440 If anything, the pool, as well as the sytnhs, exist since spring 2020. Not exactly your degen rebasing unbacked stablecoin!

@drtomato1440如果有的话,这个游泳池和sytnhs自2020年春季就存在了。不完全是你的degen rebasing unbacked stablecoin!

发表时间:4年前 作者:Curve @CurveFinance详情