👍 https://twitter.com/NamecheapC...

👍 https://twitter.com/NamecheapC...

@NamecheapCEO That's ok, we are using a different registrar anyway. Worrying about other DeFi projects.
Could be that it's really DNS issue: intermediaries are unnecessary. We need all to do better with ENS

@NamecheapCEO没关系，反正我们使用的是另一个注册商。担心其他DeFi项目。
可能这真的是DNS问题：中介是不必要的。我们都需要在ENS方面做得更好

@NamecheapCEO Just few billy worth of value potentially at risk, no biggie

@NamecheapCEO只有很少的billy worth有潜在风险的价值，没什么大不了的

Great that it was figured early! https://twitter.com/NamecheapC...

太好了，我早就想到了！https://twitter.com/NamecheapC...

RT: An alternate domain has been set-up as a precaution for Convex users.
https://convexfinance.fi/
and
https://frax.convexfinance.fi/
Users are encouraged to use these URLs to interact with the site while the investigation into the DNS hijack is conducted.

RT：已经为凸面用户设置了一个备用域作为预防措施。
https://convexfinance.fi/
和
https://frax.convexfinance.fi/
在调查DNS劫持事件时，鼓励用户使用这些URL与网站进行交互。

@0xa9a @newmichwill Yes, that is exactly correct

@0xa9a@newmichwill是的，这完全正确

RT: @stocastico7 @ProgrammerSmart @BalancerLabs This is a great question. I don't think there's a closed-form solution for accurately pricing Curve LP tokens if underlying prices are different. A lower bound can be calculated by assuming a constant sum invariant and I think this is what most protocols do https://t.co/10t4yDnJsn

RT：@stocastico7@ProgrammerSmart@BalancerLabs这是一个很好的问题。如果基础价格不同，我不认为有一个封闭形式的解决方案可以精确地为曲线LP代币定价。可以通过假设一个常数和不变量来计算下限，我认为这是大多数协议所做的https://t.co/10t4yDnJsn

@stronghodl Yes, we don't use that registrar, and nothing like that is noticed

@stronghodl是的，我们不使用注册器，也没有注意到类似的情况

Convex frontend attack (via DNS hijack) apparently affected only 5 users. If you are one of them - contact Convex, but the damage seems vanishingly small.
Investigation still ongoing. It could be possible that safety of certain DNS registrar could be under doubt.
Wen ENS https://twitter.com/ConvexFina...

凸面前端攻击（通过DNS劫持）显然只影响了5个用户。如果你是他们中的一员——接触凸面，但损伤似乎非常小。
调查仍在进行中。某些DNS注册器的安全性可能会受到怀疑。
温恩斯https://twitter.com/ConvexFina...

RT: Investigation is still ongoing, but a quick update for the community:
- DNS for https://convexfinance.com/ was hijacked, prompting users to approve malicious contracts for some interactions on the site.
- Funds on verified contracts are unaffected.

RT：调查仍在进行中，但社区需要快速更新：
-的DNShttps://convexfinance.com/被劫持，提示用户批准网站上某些交互的恶意合同。
-已核实合同的资金不受影响。

RT: Do not interact with the 'Lock CVX' convex page. Currently it will prompt you to approve a new nefarious contract with a similar address to the authentic contract. The 'Claim' page frontend seems unaffected, however be safe and check your token approvals. @CurveCap @DefiMoon https://twitter.com/ConvexFina... https://t.co/lfVh05EkUV

RT：不要与“锁定CVX”凸面页面交互。目前，它会提示您批准一个新的恶意合同，该合同的地址与真实合同的地址相似。“索赔”页面前端似乎未受影响，但请确保安全并检查您的代币批准@DefiMoon曲线图https://twitter.com/ConvexFina... https://t.co/lfVh05EkUV

@DayTradingGuy @foldfinance @iearnfinance REVOKE if you see it!
also revoke 0x72a1a639c69f8002f035a7dc231d634d74e6b86e

@DayTradingGuy@foldfinance@iearnfinance撤销，如果你看到了！
同时撤销0x72a1a639c69f8002f035a7dc231d634d74e6b86e

Careful with convex UI. Something odd is being noticed. Meanwhile - please revoke unknown approvals https://twitter.com/ConvexFina...

小心凸面UI。人们注意到了一些奇怪的事情。同时-请撤销未知批准https://twitter.com/ConvexFina...

@JohnLiquidity @AragonProject @Google Anyone can upload anything on ipfs, and gateways should be able to give out ANY information which was uploaded. Not all the domain should be masked as unsafe, but just certain links.
Practically I agree though, your solution works

@JohnLiquidity@AragonProject@Google任何人都可以在ipfs上上传任何东西，网关应该能够提供上传的任何信息。不是所有的域都应该被屏蔽为不安全的，而是某些链接。
实际上，我同意你的解决方案

@foldfinance @AragonProject @Google Indeed, https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXmPnApu... or alike would work instead

@foldfinance@AragonProject@谷歌的确，https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXmPnApu...或者类似的方法会起作用

Apparently @AragonProject ipfs gateway [https://twitter.com/safety/uns...] is being flagged by @Google as malicious. Shame on Google, cannot trust this "safety" tool!
"Ignore the risk" for this link unborks a bunch of frontends (including https://dao.curve.fi/dao) which depend on it https://t.co/h7I4QpxISA

显然@AragonProject ipfs网关[https://twitter.com/safety/uns...]被@Google标记为恶意。谷歌真可耻，不能相信这个“安全”工具！
此链接的“忽略风险”取消了一系列前端（包括https://dao.curve.fi/dao)这取决于它https://t.co/h7I4QpxISA

@JonGalt14 It’s not the matter of voting for the sake of voting. Nothing can happen physically with that chunk funds without a vote. We couldn’t take them even if we wanted to, neither could we convert and distribute (otherwise would do it).
Non-custodial!

@JonGalt14这不是为了投票而投票的问题。如果没有投票权，那么这一大笔资金在物理上是不会发生任何事情的。即使我们愿意，我们也不能接受它们，我们也不能转换和分发（否则就可以了）。
非托管！

RT: I heard you guys like Atomic Swaps from @synthetix_io on @CurveFinance & @1inch
I just setup factory pools (seth/eth & wbtc/sbtc) on Curve to enable Atomic Swaps on @optimismPBC
Volume to follow!
https://optimism.curve.fi/fact... & https://optimistic.etherscan.i...

RT：我听说你们喜欢@CurveFinance&；上的@synthetix\u io的原子交换@1英寸
我只是在曲线上设置了工厂池（seth/eth和wbtc/sbtc），以便在@optimismPBC上启用原子交换
要跟踪的音量！
https://optimism.curve.fi/fact...&；https://optimistic.etherscan.i...

RT: Step 1) Launch FRAXBP ✅
Step 2) Attain FRAXBP gauge ✅
Step 3) Vote to make FRAXBP a base pool ✅ (⏳)
Step 4) $veCRV whitelist 👈
You aren't here 👈 ... yet.
But in 6 days and 19 mins you will be!
@fraxfinance 🤝 @ConvexFinance 🤝 @CurveFinance https://t.co/3ApYeCSi76

RT：步骤1）启动FRAXBP✅
步骤2）获得FRAXBP量规✅
步骤3）投票使FRAXBP成为基本池✅ (⏳)
步骤4）$veCRV白名单👈
你不在这里👈 ... 然而
但再过6天19分钟，你就会成功！
@fraxfinance公司🤝 @对流财务🤝 @曲线金融https://t.co/3ApYeCSi76

@Professor_QJ Yes but there was a bug in the code. This deploys a new code which converts the part which was missing

@教授QJ是的，但代码中有一个bug。这将部署一个新代码来转换丢失的部分