用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@hellbee_ @DrTomFrieden https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@BRok_Horrible @DrTomFrieden 36 out of 1.3 million when the total is actually over 26k (actually more, since data from some states are missing) means that there would a billion Americans if this were representative. It's not even close.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@hellbee@DrTomFriedenhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@BRok_Thorbious@DrTomFrieden在130万人中占36人,而总数实际上超过了2600人(实际上更多,因为一些州的数据缺失),这意味着如果这具有代表性的话,将有10亿美国人。它甚至都不接近。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@justthefacts85 @NuritBaytch @alexmeshkin Ah, that's different. Somewhat closer to a random sample, with the obvious caveats.

@只是事实85@NuritBaytch@alexmeshkin啊,那是不同的。有点接近随机样本,但有明显的警告。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@greg_travis It's an attempt to bootstrap a sort of social network for scientific papers, I think.

@greg_travis我认为这是一种尝试,为科学论文建立一种社交网络。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NuritBaytch @justthefacts85 @alexmeshkin It means 4% that spends most of their day in an environment with other people who are frequently tested and excluded if positive.

@NuritBaytch@justthefact85@alexmeshkin这意味着4%的人一天中大部分时间都与其他人呆在一起,这些人经常接受检测,如果检测结果呈阳性,则被排除在外。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BRok_Horrible @DrTomFrieden 36 out of 1.3 million when the total is actually over 26k (actually more, since data from some states are missing) means that there would a billion Americans if this were representative. It's not even close.

@BRok_Thorbious@DrTomFrieden在130万人中占36人,而总数实际上超过了2600人(实际上更多,因为一些州的数据缺失),这意味着如果这具有代表性的话,将有10亿美国人。它甚至都不接近。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Mxhrad @NealBrowning I think you might have missed the point here. The industry tests showed that covid DOES spread on planes at a pretty significant rate.
Of course it was spun to say the opposite.

@Mxhrad@NealBrowning我想你可能没有抓住要点。行业测试表明,新冠病毒确实以相当显著的速度在飞机上传播。
当然,它的意思是相反的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Nutmeg031992 @RYogurt2 @DrTomFrieden @DesireeSeattle Who knows how they picked those, but if it were a representative sample over a recent period, there would be like a billion Americans.
Whatever it is, it's terribly misleading.

@肉豆蔻031992@RYogurt2@DrTomFrieden@desireeesettle谁知道他们是如何挑选的,但如果它是最近一段时间内的一个代表性样本,将有大约10亿美国人。
不管是什么,这都是非常误导人的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@frischa @yekdeli @AbraarKaran @becca_1202 @brosseau_lisa Take them out of the bag a day or two before you use them.

@frischa@yekdeli@AbraarKaran@becca_1202@brosseau_lisa在使用前一两天从袋子里拿出来。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@TheSkylineTrail @NKinNewEng @wsbgnl They want the most widespread and fastest surge in order to hope for a sustained period of quiescence from acquired immunity during the midterm elections in order to be able to focus the campaign on things other than the catastrophically failed pandemic response.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@greg06897是
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@他们希望得到最广泛和最快的增兵,以期在中期选举期间从获得的免疫力中获得一段持续的平静期,以便能够将竞选活动的重点放在灾难性失败的大流行反应以外的事情上。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RpsAgainstTrump Cancun

@RPSAGAINST特朗普坎昆

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@RYogurt2 @DrTomFrieden @DesireeSeattle It's not
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

US breakthrough covid deaths reported by state and county health departments and by media outlets
Total: 26,846
NOTE: No data was found for FL, IA, or KS. Only incomplete or outdated data was available for AL, AR, CO, HI, LA, NC, NY, SD, WI
(links to data sources below) https://t.co/2XrLINVEip

发表时间:4年前 作者:wsbgnl @wsbgnl

@RYogurt2@DrTomFrieden@desireeesettle不是
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

州和县卫生部门和媒体报道的美国突破性新冠病毒死亡
总数:26846
注:未找到FL、IA或KS的数据。对于AL、AR、CO、HI、LA、NC、NY、SD、WI,只有不完整或过时的数据可用
(以下数据源链接)https://t.co/2XrLINVEip

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DrTomFrieden CDC data is not credible. Here is some data from states.
Over 26,000 breakthrough deaths, not 36.
Please delete your tweet, it is misinformation.
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

US breakthrough covid deaths reported by state and county health departments and by media outlets
Total: 26,846
NOTE: No data was found for FL, IA, or KS. Only incomplete or outdated data was available for AL, AR, CO, HI, LA, NC, NY, SD, WI
(links to data sources below) https://t.co/2XrLINVEip

发表时间:4年前 作者:wsbgnl @wsbgnl

@CDC的数据不可信。以下是一些来自各州的数据。
超过26000例突破性死亡,而不是36例。
请删除您的推文,这是错误信息。
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

州和县卫生部门和媒体报道的美国突破性新冠病毒死亡
总数:26846
注:未找到FL、IA或KS的数据。对于AL、AR、CO、HI、LA、NC、NY、SD、WI,只有不完整或过时的数据可用
(以下数据源链接)https://t.co/2XrLINVEip

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DataDrivenMD What do still-infected kids do during lunch?

@DataDrivenMD仍然受感染的孩子在午餐时做什么?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@karlbykarlsmith @Aella_Girl Maybe they're really good at cloaking and producing froi gras but bad at everything else, easy to conquer.

@karlbykarlsmith@Aella_Girl也许他们真的很擅长伪装和制作froi gras,但其他方面都很差,很容易征服。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@magistracohen @denise_dewald @DrLeanaWen This is why. She's also not in her office at GWU because that is also remote.
https://twitter.com/brianstelt...

Like other major media companies, CNN is making changes due to the new Covid surge. CNN offices are closing "to all employees who do not have to be in the office to do their jobs," per internal memo tonight. Back to 2020 protocols, essentially.

发表时间:4年前 作者:Brian Stelter @brianstelter

@magistracohen@denise_dewald@DrLeanaWen这就是原因。她也不在GWU的办公室,因为那里也很偏远。
https://twitter.com/brianstelt...

与其他主要媒体公司一样,CNN也因新冠疫情的激增而做出了改变。根据今晚的内部备忘录,CNN办公室将“对所有不必在办公室工作的员工关闭”。基本上回到2020年协议。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Jadklein @michaelmina_lab It doesn't say anything about stopping transmission. It says "prevent covid-19" which is symptomatic disease.

@Jadklein@michaelmina_实验室它没有说任何关于停止传播的内容。它说“预防新冠病毒-19”,这是一种症状性疾病。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mraosu @michaelmina_lab Originally no. Initially the message was keep your mask on because vaccinated can still get infected and transmit. Some time during 2020 that story changed.

@mraosu@michaelmina_实验室最初没有。最初的信息是戴上口罩,因为接种疫苗仍然会感染和传播。在2020年的某个时候,这个故事发生了变化。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@EntropyChase @michaelmina_lab They were developed and tested to stop symptomatic infection, something they don't do very well any more. The vaccines needed to be updated. We're using vaccines developed for a virus that no longer exists. There is some cross-immunity, but not great.

@EntropyChase@michaelmina_实验室他们被开发和测试来阻止症状性感染,这一点他们已经做得不太好了。疫苗需要更新。我们正在使用为一种不再存在的病毒研制的疫苗。有一些交叉免疫,但不是很好。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@AbraarKaran It's also not evidence based at all. The entire worse-is-better argument in this instance is built on top of nothing but speculation.

@AbraarKaran这也不是证据。在这种情况下,更糟的是更好的论点是建立在猜测之上的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 @MikeTRose @statnews That's one problem that is very self-correcting.

@jklmd123@MikeTRose@statnews这是一个非常自我纠正的问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情