@yossy770 @DLeonhardt Very young population, that's why. Average age is 17. You can't replicate that with healthcare and social assistance. No doubt there are good things that can be learned, there always are from any community.
@yossy770@DLeonhardt非常年轻的人口，这就是为什么。平均年龄为17岁。医疗保健和社会援助无法复制这一点。毫无疑问，我们可以从任何社区学到很多好东西。
@SolliesSurgery @ASlavitt Wrong https://t.co/cFVrWdZ6pn
@SolliesUrgery@ASlavitt错了https://t.co/cFVrWdZ6pn
@IronKenX @nannieboo @ASlavitt That time period is cherry picked. You can see the entire pandemic in the chart Andy posted.
@IronKenX@nannieboo@ASlavitt这段时间是樱桃采摘的。你可以在安迪发布的图表中看到整个大流行。
@nannieboo @ASlavitt It's right there on the chart.
@nannieboo@ASlavitt就在图表上。
@tippet523 @ASlavitt Florida has about 30% more over 65 but also has higher deaths in younger people.
@tippet523@ASlavitt Florida的65岁以上人口增加了约30%，但年轻人的死亡率也更高。
@SolliesSurgery @ASlavitt CDC breaks out NYC from the rest of NY
@SolliesUrgery@ASlavitt疾病预防控制中心将纽约从纽约其他地区分离出来
@jonah_pouted @thereal_truther Read Jacobson. "Free society" is not anarchy, there are always limits on acceptable or required behavior as necessary for society to function as it deems necessary. This is a clear answer to "any vaccine", where consequences for society may be dire.
@乔纳撅起嘴来@thereal_truther阅读雅各布森。“自由社会”不是无政府状态，社会在其认为必要的情况下运作所需的可接受或必需的行为总是有限制的。这是对“任何疫苗”的明确回答，在这种疫苗中，对社会的后果可能是可怕的。
@alexmeshkin What was actually outlined is taking SWIFT off the table.
@亚历克斯梅斯金实际上概述的是把斯威夫特从桌子上拿下来。
@nick13129361 @LukeSampe @JeromeAdamsMD It's not that easy because you are looking at different virus over time.
@nick13129361@LukeSampe@JeromeAdamsMD这并不容易，因为随着时间的推移，你会看到不同的病毒。
@bigreddog5 @JeromeAdamsMD Probably hard to measure for <50 since severe disease reasonably rare to begin with
https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...
@bigreddog5@JeromeAdamsMD可能很难测量<；50因为严重的疾病一开始就相当罕见
https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...
@cornishmooner @whippletom @JamesWard73 It can and likely will, over many generations.
@cornishmooner@whipletom@JamesWard73它可以而且很可能会持续好几代人。
@Noahpinion @MishGEA @IrvingSwisher Isn't this a component of wealth effect? People 'feel' wealthier, they aren't just wealthier on paper.
@这不是财富效应的一个组成部分吗？人们“感觉”更富有，他们不仅仅在纸面上更富有。
@Noahpinion @IrvingSwisher Perhaps batter to cap them than exclude them?
@也许是把他们排除在外，而不是把他们排除在外？
@LongDesertTrain @nasirfmusiqi Looks close enough within the noise variation to me. Look at differences in June too. Good point about causality.
@在我看来，LongDesertTrain@nasirfmusiqi在噪音变化范围内看起来足够近了。看看六月的差异吧。关于因果关系的观点很好。
@sparky7u @itzkovitzing @justsomeguy2u Reagan won in a landslide. Clearly there was demand for the product he was selling.
@sparky7u@itzkovizing@justsomeguy2u里根以压倒性优势获胜。很明显，他销售的产品有需求。
@tnicholsmd @ChristosArgyrop @hjelle_brian Indeed
@tnicholsmd@ChristosArgyrop@hjelle_brian
@tnicholsmd @ChristosArgyrop @hjelle_brian Let them eat pi.
@tnicholsmd@ChristosArgyrop@hjelle_brian让他们吃pi。
@RadCentrism @zanfr @Gab_H_R Setting the bar low, but I mostly agree.
@RadCentrism@zanfr@Gab_H_R降低了标准，但我基本上同意。