@hjelle_brian Case count may be unreliable if reported testing winds down, either by policy or in practice.

@hjelle_brian病例计数可能不可靠，如果报告的检测结果逐渐减少，无论是在政策上还是在实践中。

@noah_guttman @itosettiMD_MBA @NuritBaytch @kweansmom @apoorva_nyc Parody account

@noah_guttman@itosettiMD_MBA@NuritBaytch@kweansmom@apoorva_nyc模仿账户

@itosettiMD_MBA @NuritBaytch @noah_guttman @kweansmom @apoorva_nyc If all else fails, add more 9s.

@itosettiMD_MBA@NuritBaytch@noah_guttman@kweansmom@apoorva_nyc如果其他方法都失败了，再加上9。

@JamilaElGizuli @johnbruso @__philipn__ Can't say, this study was looking at testes. Science often moves one small step at a time.

@JamilaElGizuli@johnbruso@uuuu philipn\uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu不能说，这项研究是针对睾丸的。科学常常一步一小步地前进。

@aeyokay @JamilaElGizuli @johnbruso @__philipn__ https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Aeyook@JamilaElGizuli@johnbruso@uuuu philipp__https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@JamilaElGizuli @johnbruso @__philipn__ The paper says that the testicular damage was prevented by vaccination

@JamilaElGizuli@johnbruso@uuuu philipn_uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

@DrZoeHyde @CamiloGuezRodri Kids don't get covid, kids don't transmit, and covid doesn't spread in schools /s

@DrZoeHyde@CamiloGuezRodri儿童不会感染新冠病毒，儿童不会传播，新冠病毒不会在学校传播

@JeromeAdamsMD Over sticker price is now "normal"
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/1...

@jeromeadamsmd在贴纸价格现在是“正常”
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/1...

@Nutmeg031992 @mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes Anyway, in terms of sanity check, my high level view is that many or most of the population in "high covid" countries (i.e. most of the west) has been infected. So if you do what is considered "normal behavior" or even mild "careful" repeatedly, likely outcome is infected.

@肉豆蔻031992@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes无论如何，在精神检查方面，我的高层观点是，“高新冠”国家（即西方大部分地区）的许多或大部分人口已经感染。所以，如果你反复做被认为是“正常行为”的事情，甚至是轻微的“小心”，那么很可能的结果就是感染。

@Nutmeg031992 @mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes Fits with experience in my social circle of people with Omicron tending to transmit readily if given the opportunity more so than previous variants. But that's anecdotal of course.

@肉豆蔻031992@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes符合我的社交圈的经验，如果有机会，奥米克龙比以前的变种更容易传播。但这当然只是个传闻。

@Nutmeg031992 @mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes This paper (cited by WHO in their Omicron briefing) cites attack rates of 39% vs 26% for delta. I think 10% is out of date, seems plausible to have been right with Wuhan virus.
https://www.researchsquare.com...

@肉豆蔻031992@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes这篇论文（世卫组织在其Omicron简报中引用）引用了德尔塔的39%和26%的攻击率。我认为10%已经过时，武汉病毒似乎是对的。
https://www.researchsquare.com...

@DrLeanaWen There are far more than two paths. Your attempt to narrow debate to a rhetorically convenient closed set of "paths" is dishonest.

@Leanawen博士，有远远不止两条路。你试图将辩论缩小到一套修辞上方便的封闭“路径”是不诚实的。

@Nutmeg031992 @mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes I don't recall repeated infection being particuarly relevant. Wachter hasn't been infected with covid at all, much less omicron, as far as we know. If you exclude people who have been w/O from the "future chain of infections" part, that's maybe 50%, within stated uncertainties.

@肉豆蔻031992@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes我不记得反复感染与此特别相关。据我们所知，瓦赫特根本没有感染新冠病毒，更不用说奥米克龙了。如果将未感染者排除在“未来感染链”之外，这可能是50%，在规定的不确定性范围内。

@Nutmeg031992 @mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes (Apart from a month ago when Omi rates were much higher of course, but still historically very high.)

@肉豆蔻031992@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes（一个月前，Omi率当然要高得多，但历史上仍然很高。）

@Nutmeg031992 @mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes The time period matters a lot. Prior to vaccines there were shutdowns or capacity restrictions when cases were high (often thresholds were much lower than current rates!). Prior to Omi, vax protected much better against infection. Risk level for infection close to maximum now.

@肉豆蔻031992@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes时间段很重要。在接种疫苗之前，当病例较高时（通常阈值远低于当前的发病率！），会出现关闭或产能限制。在Omi之前，vax可以更好地防止感染。现在感染的风险水平接近最高水平。

@lyn_omalley @DailyJLee This is only useful pre-omicon so that's early to mid december. Since then you can extrapolate, but it isn't a low number
https://covidestim.org/

@lyn_omalley@DailyJLee这是唯一有用的预演，所以这是12月初至中旬。从那时起，你可以推断，但这不是一个很低的数字
https://covidestim.org/

@jklmd123 @DrNeilStone 2. People can't avoid it *individually* (even if they're the queen!) when it's rampant in society is a better take.

@jklmd123@DrNeilStone 2。人们无法单独避免（即使他们是女王！）当它在社会上猖獗时是更好的选择。

@mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes Pick a number, 30%, 60%, 80%, it doesn't really matter.
If you been eating or working in restaurants, etc. with prevalence a levels described in the thread, you got infected or were lucky. A good portion of the 70%, 40%, 20% who didn't were able to be more careful.

@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes选择一个数字，30%，60%，80%，这并不重要。
如果你在餐馆吃饭或工作等，并且患病率达到了线程中描述的a水平，那么你就被感染了，或者你很幸运。在70%、40%、20%的人中，有很大一部分人不能更加小心。

@mdfuerstenberg @yaneerbaryam @nytimes Nobody said anything about asymptomatic. Just not officially recorded. Not tested, self test not reported. etc.
Long Covid is pretty vague.

@mdfuerstenberg@yaneerbaryam@nytimes没有人说任何关于无症状的事情。不是官方记录的。未测试，未报告自检。等
长期新冠病毒相当模糊。

@DailyJLee @BernieDogs4 Profit center vs cost center.

@DailyJLee@BernieDogs4利润中心vs成本中心。