用户 aeon(@ AeonCoin) 的最新消息

@juli_bg_bs "VE for Omicron for immunocompetent for 2 doses" not measured. Overall for 2 doses is much lower. Non-immunocompetent is a small enough share I don't think what you're suggesting is mathematically possible. https://t.co/SNR88l5R7o

@juli_bg_bs“2剂免疫活性奥米克罗VE”未测量。2剂的总体剂量要低得多。无免疫能力的比例很小,我认为你的建议在数学上是不可能的。https://t.co/SNR88l5R7o

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@juli_bg_bs I don't even know what exhausted T cells are but there isn't much Omicron data here, and what data there is shows much lower efficacy for two doses.

@juli_bg__bs我甚至不知道耗尽的t细胞是什么,但这里没有太多Omicron的数据,有哪些数据显示两剂的疗效要低得多。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@juli_bg_bs Not so fast. Going back to March 2021 means not only is this largely pre-Omicron data but some of it is even pre-Delta. Effectiveness against a virus that doesn't exist any more doesn't seem particularly relevant today.

@juli_bg_没有那么快。回到2021年3月意味着这不仅仅是前OmiCon数据,而且有些甚至是前三角洲。对抗一种已经不存在的病毒的有效性在今天似乎并不特别重要。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NotReida @AllenPEdwards @CDCDirector When I looked earlier the page came up properly once but then looked like that after.

@NotReida@AllenPEdwards@cdcdc director当我早些时候查看时,页面正确地出现了一次,但之后看起来是这样的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@benwakana46 Maybe would have been good to not claim you had all the funding you needed a month and a half ago.

@benwakana46如果不说你一个半月前就有了所需的全部资金,那就好了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@SeamusBlackley Would be more meaningful if it were a standalone vote.

@如果是单独投票的话,Seamusballley会更有意义。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NotReida @AllenPEdwards @CDCDirector I had technical issues as well, when trying to post the link earlier.

@NotReida@AllenPEdwards@CDC主管我之前试图发布链接时也遇到了技术问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@EastBayBeast2 @OpinionatedLab This isn't accurate and wasn't accurate when the antivaxers were saying it either.

@EastBayBeast2@OpinionatedLab这是不准确的,而且当反吸血鬼说这句话时也不准确。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@holyspacemonkey @David_LKaplan @VMette2001 @hand_to_eye @ScottGottliebMD Partial accounting. It seems to be running around 20-30% of deaths are vaxed
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

US breakthrough covid deaths reported by state and county health departments and by media outlets
Total: 52,749
Note: No data was found for FL, IA, or KS. Incomplete or outdated data was available for AL, AR, CO, HI, LA, NH, NV, NY, SD, TX, WI.
(links to data sources below) https://t.co/871qX1A4BP

发表时间:4年前 作者:wsbgnl @wsbgnl

@holyspacemonkey@David_LKaplan@VMette2001@hand_to_eye@ScottGottliebMD部分核算。似乎有20-30%的死亡是由性传播疾病造成的
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

州和县卫生部门以及媒体报道的美国新冠病毒死亡突破
总数:52749
注:未找到FL、IA或KS的数据。AL、AR、CO、HI、LA、NH、NV、NY、SD、TX、WI的数据不完整或过时。
(以下数据源链接)https://t.co/871qX1A4BP

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@gregggonsalves @happyhexer It's not where or who you are, it is where and who leaders want to claim, mostly falsely, you are.
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

66% believe everyone has some responsibility for trying to prevent the spread of the virus to others
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/c... https://t.co/T4Q7rr8QSO

发表时间:4年前 作者:wsbgnl @wsbgnl

@gregggonsalves@happyhexer这不是你在哪里或是你是谁,而是领导者想在哪里和谁声称你是谁,大部分是错误的。
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/sta...

66%的人认为每个人都有责任阻止病毒向他人传播
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/c... https://t.co/T4Q7rr8QSO

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mummacity @Ssimms777 @ASlavitt It was prioritized. Primarily healthcare workers and some nursing homes by mid January. Availability to the general public came later. This had nothing to do with the change in administration.

@mummacity@Ssimms777@ASlavitt优先考虑。到1月中旬,主要是医护人员和一些养老院。之后才向公众开放。这与政府更迭无关。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CDCDirector This is what it looks like without moving the goal posts https://t.co/a4RlhKWOsi

@这就是不移动球门柱的情况https://t.co/a4RlhKWOsi

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl @michaelmina_lab @POTUS @ashishkjha https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

@wsbgnl@michaelmina lab@potus@ashishkjhahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?...

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@DataDrivenMD Badly designed poll. There is no option for variants which may be more or less dangerous, the correct answer.
The 15% who expect it to disappear entirely are more obviously misled.

@DataDrivenMD设计糟糕的投票。正确答案是,对于可能或多或少危险的变种,没有选择。
15%希望它完全消失的人显然受到了误导。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 Most countries have sports of some kind as part of the culture. It may not always be in schools. I think the point you are making is that prioritize may be out of balance in some schools, and I'm not disagreeing.

@jklmd123大多数国家都有某种体育作为文化的一部分。学校里可能并不总是这样。我认为你的观点是,在一些学校,优先顺序可能不平衡,我并不反对。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mummacity @Ssimms777 @ASlavitt This is nonsense. By January 21, 35k shots per day were being given in NC, roughly half of the peak ever achieved. https://t.co/miD614PHdW

@mummacity@Ssimms777@ASlavitt这是胡说八道。到1月21日,北卡罗来纳州每天进行35k次注射,大约是有史以来达到的峰值的一半。https://t.co/miD614PHdW

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@ASlavitt What kind of nonsense is this?
Tens of millions of people were already vaccinated by January 20, and there was minimal available of at home tests when people needed them during surges ever, while community test sites were shut down instead of scaling up.

@阿斯拉维特这是什么胡说八道?
到1月20日,已经有数千万人接种了疫苗,在有史以来的激增期间,当人们需要在家进行检测时,几乎没有可用的在家检测,而社区检测点被关闭,而不是扩大规模。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JgaltTweets @spectatorindex Threats is a better word, yes.
https://twitter.com/Journalist...

@spectatorindex @michaeldweiss I don’t think “deterrent” is the correct word in this case.

发表时间:4年前 作者:Journalistic Facts @JournalistFact1

@是的,JgaltTweets@considerIndex威胁是一个更好的词。
https://twitter.com/Journalist...

@旁观者索引@michaeldweiss我不认为“威慑”这个词在这种情况下是正确的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl It's extremely important to design policy around Trump voters, Conservatives, and Republicans, who are the only demographics who (narrowly) support the individualist approach.

@wsbgnl围绕特朗普选民、保守派和共和党制定政策极为重要,他们是唯一(狭隘地)支持个人主义方针的人口统计学。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@jklmd123 Sports has value, in learning leadership, teamwork, motivation, discipline, measurement and continuous improvement, etc. Of course, that's not ALL you need, but it helps.

@jklmd123运动在学习领导力、团队合作、动机、纪律、测量和持续改进等方面有价值。当然,这不是你所需要的,但它有帮助。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情