@jeromeusa @akajinglesloll @JeromeAdamsMD @SouthwestAir @AmericanAir @Delta @united Right, we agree the airlines don't care about the restaurants. We just disagree about the reason. Nordstrom DOES care if the rest of the mall is a ghost town, and will leave too when a mall dies like that.

@jeromeusa@Akajingleslol@JeromeAdamsMD@SouthwestAir@AmericanAir@Delta@united Right，我们同意航空公司不关心餐厅。我们只是不同意原因。诺德斯特罗姆确实关心商场的其他部分是否是鬼城，而且当商场像那样消亡时，他也会离开。

@jeromeusa @akajinglesloll @JeromeAdamsMD @SouthwestAir @AmericanAir @Delta @united It works both ways. They fill the anchor tenant first because there are fewer of them and they're bigger deals to make. The smaller stores have more churn.
That's another reason the big stores pay so little rent, BTW. Their leases are older, sometimes decades.

@jeromeusa@akajinglesloll@JeromeAdamsMD@SouthwestAir@AmericanAir@Delta@united它是双向的。他们首先填补了主力租户的空缺，因为他们的数量较少，而且要做的交易也更大。规模较小的商店有更多的顾客。
顺便说一句，这也是大商店租金如此之低的另一个原因。它们的租约比较旧，有时甚至几十年。

@jeromeusa @akajinglesloll @JeromeAdamsMD @SouthwestAir @AmericanAir @Delta @united Right, they're not because it's a captive market.
People wouldn't go to malls as much if Nordstrom and Sears were the ONLY stores there. They would, and do, go to airports just as much even when the restaurants suck.

@jeromeusa@Akajingleslol@JeromeAdamsMD@SouthwestAir@AmericanAir@Delta@united Right，他们不是因为这是一个垄断市场。
如果Nordstrom和Sears是那里唯一的商店，人们就不会去那么多商场了。即使餐馆很糟糕，他们也会去机场，而且确实如此。

@jeromeusa @akajinglesloll @JeromeAdamsMD @SouthwestAir @AmericanAir @Delta @united Yes the bigger stores are a bigger draw, so they get a better deal. However, if the rest of the mall is a ghost town or has only shitty stores with no desirable product or no inventory, Nordstrom is probably going to leave too. United Airlines probably can't/won't.

@jeromeusa@akajinglesloll@JeromeAdamsMD@SouthwestAir@AmericanAir@Delta@united是的，更大的商店更吸引人，所以他们能得到更好的交易。然而，如果商场的其他部分是一个鬼城，或者只有劣质商店，没有理想的产品或库存，诺德斯特罗姆可能也会离开。联合航空公司可能不能/不会。

@jeromeusa @akajinglesloll @JeromeAdamsMD @SouthwestAir @AmericanAir @Delta @united Anyway, the point is everyone in a mall or airport cares about foot traffic. The difference is that an airport is a captive market, and malls are usually not even remotely that.

@jeromeusa@Akajingleslol@JeromeAdamsMD@SouthwestAir@AmericanAir@Delta@united无论如何，重要的是商场或机场里的每个人都关心步行交通。不同之处在于，机场是一个垄断市场，而购物中心通常都不是这样。

@jeromeusa @akajinglesloll @JeromeAdamsMD @SouthwestAir @AmericanAir @Delta @united According to it's most recent income statement, Nordstrom paid $265 million in fixed rent and $100 million in variable rent (percentage of sales). It may (and probably does) get a better deal than smaller stores, but it doesn't pay $1 or even close to it.

@jeromeusa@Akajingleslol@JeromeAdamsMD@SouthwestAir@AmericanAir@Delta@united根据其最近的损益表，Nordstrom支付了2.65亿美元的固定租金和1亿美元的可变租金（占销售额的百分比）。它可能（而且可能确实）比小店更划算，但它的价格不到1美元，甚至不接近1美元。

@jeromeusa @akajinglesloll @JeromeAdamsMD @SouthwestAir @AmericanAir @Delta @united They kind of do because part of what you are paying for at a mall is foot traffic.
Issue with airports is the foot traffic being a captive audience.
Monopolies require effective regulation.

@jeromeusa@akajinglesloll@JeromeAdamsMD@SouthwestAir@AmericanAir@Delta@united他们这样做是因为你在购物中心支付的部分费用是步行流量。
机场的问题是，步行交通成为了一个俘虏性的观众。
垄断需要有效的监管。

@NickHenriquez @ColleenvyBailey @EricTopol Listen to Miyagi-San

@NickHenriquez@ColleenvyBailey@EricTopol听宫城三

@opinonhaver @gmukunda Ukraine

@奥皮诺哈弗@gmukunda乌克兰

@wsbgnl 90 press conferences, nearly none of which have been the *CDC press conferences* that were suggested. In fact, it has reverted to the exact same strategy as the previous administration, with CDC scientists invisible and silenced, and everything siloed through the White House.

@wsbgnl 90场新闻发布会，几乎没有一场是CDC建议的新闻发布会。事实上，它已经回到了与前一届政府完全相同的策略，CDC的科学家被隐形和沉默，一切都被关在了白宫。

@wsbgnl @berman_allen It's not a gray area when his administration identifies unboosted as "fully vaccinated"

@wsbgnl@berman_allen当他的政府认定未接种疫苗为“完全接种”时，这并不是一个灰色地带

@fitterhappierAJ https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@fitterhappierAJhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@gregggonsalves Nothing new
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@格雷戈恩没有什么新鲜事
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Marco_Piani @apsmunro @nytimes Yes that's what I meant. "Extreme" in view of covid risk but "moderate". You may be right about moderate vs. other.

@Marco_Piani@apsmunro@nytimes是的，这就是我的意思。考虑到新冠病毒风险，“极端”，但“中等”。你可能是对的，关于温和与其他。

@juli_bg_bs I don't know what that camera looking thing on the top is but it looks exposed and delicate.

@juli_bg__bs我不知道上面那个看起来像相机的东西是什么，但它看起来暴露在外，很精致。

@DrTomFrieden At currently levels of community spread in many places, everyone circulating in public has had contact with someone who was sick whether they know it or not.

@Tomfrieden博士目前，在许多地方的社区传播水平上，每个在公共场合传播的人都与生病的人有过接触，无论他们是否知道。

@Marco_Piani @apsmunro @nytimes Such "extreme moderates" seems like an unusual group to me. I guess without (at least not from the screen shot) knowing the number in that group it may be plausible.

@Marco_Piani@apsmunro@nytimes这样的“极端温和派”对我来说似乎是一个不同寻常的群体。我想在不知道（至少不是从屏幕截图上看）这个群体的人数的情况下，这可能是合理的。

@rkaviate @chrisgj198 @DrKatrin_Rabiei @vet_dot Depends on the speed of fatality. At 20% fatality people will quickly self-mitigate when their friends start to die and there are mass graves not just in every city but in every neighborhood.

@rkaviate@chrisgj198@DrKatrin_Rabiei@vet_dot取决于死亡速度。在20%的死亡率下，当他们的朋友开始死亡时，人们会很快自我缓解，而且不仅在每个城市，而且在每个社区都有乱葬坑。

@apsmunro @nytimes This distribution is extremely odd. Why do very liberal, very conservative and moderate perceive the most risk?

@apsmunro@nytimes这种分布非常奇怪。为什么非常自由、非常保守和温和的人认为风险最大？

@ColleenvyBailey @EricTopol CDC has no data on that. First authorization of boosters in the US was September 22 (actual availability was a few days later). Six months will be hit next week.

@ColleenByBailey@EricTopol CDC没有这方面的数据。在美国，助推器的首次授权是9月22日（实际可用时间是几天后）。下周将迎来六个月。