@Noahpinion Noah, you're too smart for this BS.

@诺安诺亚，你太聪明了。

@RobertCNott @Rsc001Sish @Yoli22258018 @GrondaMorin @BSBonner The agreement binds Russia to seek Security Concil action to protect Ukraine. A veto would be yet another violation.

@RobertCNott@Rsc001Sish@Yoli22258018@GrondaMorin@BSBonner该协议约束俄罗斯寻求安全和解行动以保护乌克兰。否决权将是另一种违反。

@ems_jn Here's another study of in-flight transmission, exhaustively contact traced and confirmed with genomic sequencing. Passengers infected all seated near each other showing the effects of short range transmission. Airplane ventilation isn't sufficient.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/arti...

@ems_jn这是另一项关于飞行传播的研究，通过基因组测序进行了详尽的接触追踪和确认。所有受感染的乘客都坐得很近，显示出短程传播的影响。飞机通风不足。
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/arti...

@ems_jn Mannequins are less conducive to transmission. They don't turn their heads toward another passenger. They don't circulate around the cabin or use rest rooms. They don't take their masks off to eat or drink.
Reality is WORSE than what a mannequin study would suggest, not better.

@ems_jn人体模型不利于传播。他们不会把头转向另一位乘客。他们不在机舱内走动或使用洗手间。他们不摘下口罩吃饭或喝酒。
现实比人体模型研究所显示的更糟，而不是更好。

@realMrFrank @juli_bg_bs It'll drive demand, but not specifically for gas. A lot of it will get spent on other things. This could be bad for broader inflation, but likewise for cutting the gas tax.

@realMrFrank@juli_bg_________________________________。很多钱会花在其他事情上。这可能不利于更广泛的通货膨胀，但同样也不利于削减天然气税。

@Yaunkar @LostWeapons How many of those nukes work?

@Yaunkar@LostWeapons有多少核武器有效？

@LynnLund13 @LazarusLong13 @BolognaFishMD @WHOSTP @AlondraNelson46 The focus on someone leaving the room strikes me as a distraction. Sure, it happens on occasion, but the vast majority of transmission has to be while people are in the same room.

@LynnLund13@LazarusLong13@BolognaFishMD@WHOSTP@AlondraNelson46关注某人离开房间让我分心。当然，这是偶尔发生的，但绝大多数传播必须在人们在同一房间时进行。

@realMrFrank @juli_bg_bs It absolutely is efficient during a supply disruption. The high pump price continues to encourage cutting back on usage while the rebate helps with the financial impact.
Places cutting the tax at the pump are encouraging more demand, and likely driving up the gas price.

@realMrFrank@juli_bg_bs在供应中断期间绝对有效。高泵价继续鼓励减少使用，而回扣有助于缓解财务影响。
在加油站减税的地方正在鼓励更多的需求，并可能推高天然气价格。

@C02Equinox @Isvac007 @RealSexyCyborg @DrLeanaWen (Which is not to say that brain fog is not real, it's just harder to document. Physical brain damage has been measured though.)

@C02Equinox@Isvac007@RealSexyCyborg@DrLeanaWen（这并不是说脑雾不是真的，只是更难记录。不过，已经测量了物理性脑损伤。）

@C02Equinox @Isvac007 @RealSexyCyborg @DrLeanaWen All of those are well documented in recent studies.
It is the more subjective symptoms like "brain fog" that make more sense to debate. Anyone debating these is just stupid or dishonest.

@C02Equinox@Isvac007@RealSexyCyborg@DrLeanaWen所有这些都在最近的研究中得到了很好的记录。
正是像“脑雾”这样更主观的症状更值得讨论。任何人争论这些都是愚蠢或不诚实的。

@C02Equinox @Isvac007 @RealSexyCyborg @DrLeanaWen Or maybe not lucky. Not all the damage is immediately visible. Increased risk of subsequent diabetes, increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, decline in kidney function, etc.

@C02Equinox@Isvac007@RealSexyCyborg@DrLeanaWen或者可能不走运。并非所有的损坏都能立即看到。糖尿病风险增加，心血管事件风险增加，肾功能下降等。

@blahEhhGee @alt1na1 @RealSexyCyborg @DrLeanaWen That's not organic. It's what you expect when you have one large outbreak (Wuhan) followed by near-elimination.

@blahEhhGee@alt1na1@RealSexyCyborg@DrLeanaWen这不是有机的。当你在武汉爆发一次大的疫情，然后几乎被消灭时，这就是你所期待的。

@ems_jn Article also notes that if people are talking, risk is increased by about 10x, along with other potential higher risks (bathrooms, infectious people moving about the cabin so exposure not limited to nearby seats, etc.)

@ems_jn的文章还指出，如果有人在说话，风险会增加约10倍，以及其他潜在的更高风险（浴室、感染者在机舱内走动，因此接触不限于附近座位等）

@PoppaGeorgio5 @ems_jn 20 air exchanges is good, but not sufficient to prevent accumulation of risk of mostly near-field transmission (i.e. someone breathing directly on you before the air is exchanged or filtered) over time. See article linked in other reply.

@PoppaGeorgio5@ems_jn 20空气交换是好的，但不足以防止随着时间的推移，主要是近场传播的风险积累（即在交换或过滤空气之前有人直接在你身上呼吸）。见其他回复中链接的文章。

@ems_jn 1. There are numerous case reports of transmission on planes, particularly longer flights (which supports the notion of accumulated risk) e.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
2. Correction: 54 hours, I misremembered.
https://www.washingtonpost.com... https://t.co/ufrvRZcQaj

@ems_jn 1。有许多关于飞机传播的病例报告，尤其是较长的飞行（这支持累积风险的概念），例如：。https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...
2.更正：54小时，我记错了。
https://www.washingtonpost.com... https://t.co/ufrvRZcQaj

@wsbgnl Interesting how the blue check antimaskers are often talking about how it is unfair to vaccinated people, yet vaccinated people support this MORE than unvaccinated.

@wsbgnl有趣的是，蓝支票反吸烟者经常谈论这对接种疫苗的人是多么不公平，然而接种疫苗的人比未接种疫苗的人更支持这一点。

@SalemJakes Variants are multiple times more transmissible yet CDC guidelines on what constitutes a close contact haven't budged since early 2020.
Make it make sense.

@SalemJakes变种的传染性要高出数倍，但自2020年初以来，CDC关于什么构成密切接触的指导方针一直没有改变。
让它有意义。

@jeremyfaust There is plenty of transmission on planes. With masks, with immobile dummies, ignoring boarding, ignoring food and drinks, with wild type virus airline study estimated one infection from nearby index case per 55 flight hours. Reality has to be much worse.

@jeremyfaust飞机上有大量的信号传输。带着口罩，带着不动的假人，无视登机，无视食物和饮料，野生型病毒航空公司的研究估计每55个飞行小时就有一例来自附近指数病例的感染。现实必须更糟。

@wsbgnl Did the person who just equated masking in a pharmacy with banning weddings then link her old article warning us to beware of extremes?
Yes she did.

@wsbgnl一位将药店内的掩蔽等同于禁止婚礼的人是否将她的老文章链接到警告我们要警惕极端？
是的。

@SenLambert_IN @BenjySarlin 7% would probably be all black females, but not women. Have to subtract kids.

@在@BenjySarlin 7%中，SenLambert_可能都是黑人女性，但不是女性。必须减去孩子。