@spawnofKahn @Noahpinion @evanbear20 @wesyang I'm pretty sure nobody buying Chinese shit is very wrong. There may well be overcapacity as you say, but probably not infinite. On the other hand, the Russian economy is pretty small, so maybe easy to supply.

@spawnofKahn@Noahpinion@evanbear20@wesyang我很确定没有人买中国狗屎是非常错误的。正如你所说，很可能存在产能过剩，但可能不是无限的。另一方面，俄罗斯经济规模相当小，因此可能很容易供应。

@TRyanGregory When matters too. The best you can really do in life is delay disease and death. Ultimately time takes us all. Rather later than sooner.

@在重要的时候尝试一下。你一生中能做的最好的事就是延缓疾病和死亡。最终，时间需要我们所有人。而不是更早。

@Noahpinion @spawnofKahn @evanbear20 @wesyang Also, whatever equipment China was making someone was already using. Would have to not only sell to Russia, but stop selling to someone else.

@Noahpinion@spawnofKahn@evanbear20@wesyang还有，中国制造的任何设备都已经有人在使用了。不仅要向俄罗斯出售，还要停止向其他国家出售。

@Turboshunt @DHATE2020 @85JJB @BallouxFrancois It's either a literal troll or someone so dumb they mimic the troll messaging using the exact same wording and phrases. Either way, best choice.

@Turbo分流@DHATE2020@85JJB@BallouxFrancois它要么是一个字面上的巨魔，要么是一个如此愚蠢的人，他们用完全相同的措辞和短语模仿巨魔的信息。无论哪种方式，都是最佳选择。

@danaludwig @kareneolson @StephTaitWrites @ahandvanish China, of course, is 2-4 grid lines lower, so 99%-99.99% lower.
Elimination is almost magic, when achievable. But the above point that Japan may have accomplished a preferred cost-benefit is still worth considering.

@当然，danaludwig@kareneolson@StephTaitWrites@ahandvanish China的网格线要低2-4条，所以要低99%-99.99%。
消除几乎是魔术，如果可以实现的话。但上述日本可能实现了首选成本效益的观点仍然值得考虑。

@rickmcull @mustafahirji @lisa_iannattone @TRyanGregory The adaptations were mostly pesticides and removal of mosquito breeding sites.

@rickmcull@mustafahirji@lisa\u iannattone@TRyanGregory适应主要是杀虫剂和清除蚊子滋生地。

@rickmcull @mustafahirji @lisa_iannattone @TRyanGregory "More than 100 countries have eliminated malaria in the past century"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/b...

@rickmcull@mustafahirji@lisa\u iannattone@TRyanGregory“在过去的一个世纪里，100多个国家已经消灭了疟疾”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/b...

@danaludwig @kareneolson @StephTaitWrites @ahandvanish Log chart is obscuring that Japan is mostly 80-90% (one grid line) lower than the others.

@danaludwig@kareneolson@StephTaitWrites@ahandvanish对数图模糊了日本比其他国家低80-90%（一条网格线）。

@TwHandle @edsuom @dorisjac20 @StephTaitWrites Go look up the report from crimson contagion. How well did the "well prepared" US do responding and how many died?
None of this should have been a surprise to anyone.

@TwHandle@edsuom@dorisjac20@StephTaitWrites去查看深红传染病的报告。“准备充分”的美国反应如何，有多少人死亡？
所有这些都不应该让任何人感到惊讶。

@EB26420935 @AdithyaR_YXE @bridget857 @HelenBranswell True that. I don't work for them, do you?
Outdoor is probably fine, so impact would vary by location, climate, and feasibility of things like outdoor heaters.

@EB26420935@AdithyaR\u YXE@bridget857@HelenBranswell真的。我不为他们工作，你呢？
户外可能很好，所以影响会因位置、气候和户外加热器等事物的可行性而有所不同。

@EB26420935 @AdithyaR_YXE @bridget857 @HelenBranswell I don't know that any of it is a "solution". Maybe, maybe not. But the idea that if everyone did as she did society would collapse is just plain wrong.

@EB26420935@AdithyaR\u YXE@bridget857@HelenBranswell我不知道其中任何一个是“解决方案”。也许，也许不是。但是，如果每个人都像她那样做，社会就会崩溃的想法是完全错误的。

@Keubiko https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@库比科https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@tigerdevonshire @wino6687 @MikeyDucati @alexeheath He's not saying it does, he's just saying as owner he doesn't want to block it.

@tigerdevonshire@wino6687@MikeyDucati@alexeheath他不是说有，他只是说作为所有者，他不想阻止它。

@EB26420935 @AdithyaR_YXE @bridget857 @HelenBranswell It's apparently not unrealistic for her. Your premise was "if everybody does it". Well, they're not, but if everybody chose N95 as the better tradeoff, society would function just fine.

@EB26420935@AdithyaR\u YXE@bridget857@HelenBranswell这对她来说显然并不不切实际。你的前提是“如果每个人都这样做”。事实并非如此，但如果每个人都选择N95作为更好的折衷方案，社会就会运转良好。

@EB26420935 @bridget857 @HelenBranswell You ignored the N95 and off hours part. Society can function just fine with filtration and people spreading out and doing things in less crowded ways.

@EB26420935@bridget857@HelenBranswell您忽略了N95和非工作时间部分。通过过滤，人们可以分散开来，以不那么拥挤的方式做事，社会可以正常运转。

@N_kadar @JRubinBlogger Delaying is without legal basis in any case, but what you wrote is also false. Trump wrote "AND WE WIN" meaning the stated intent of the imagined sequence of events suggested was to overturn. It wasn't to reconsider for purpose of dotting i's and crossing t's.

@N\u kadar@JRubinBlogger Delaying在任何情况下都没有法律依据，但您所写的也是错误的。特朗普写道“我们赢了”，意思是所设想的一连串事件的公开意图是颠覆。这并不是为了打点i和穿过t而重新考虑。

@e1m88 @Keubiko @kevinmuir It's a market incentive to drain storage, which implies high current demand. Futures curves don't really predict price, they tell you the storage premium (and carry). Price, and curves, can still go up and down from here due to supply and/or demand shifts.

@e1m88@Keubiko@kevinmuir耗尽存储是一种市场激励，这意味着高电流需求。期货曲线并不能真正预测价格，而是告诉你存储溢价（和携带）。由于供应和/或需求的变化，价格和曲线仍可能在这里上下波动。

@patrickbrun @gls_energy @Keubiko Define "solved". There are no empty gas stations or gas lines. Anyone who wants a barrel of oil can buy one, so there is no "shortage" in a true sense. People just don't like the price. Markets don't care what you like.

@patrickbrun@gls\U energy@Keubiko定义“已解决”。没有空的加油站或输气管道。任何想要一桶石油的人都可以买一桶，所以真正意义上的“短缺”并不存在。人们只是不喜欢这个价格。市场不在乎你喜欢什么。

@tylerblack32 e.g. 1% change in probability of Bitcoin -> 10T = +/- 100B or >10% current volatility. 10% change in probability...

@tylerblack32例如，比特币概率变化1%->；10T=+/-100B或>；当前波动率为10%。概率变化10%。。。

@tylerblack32 In effect, to serve a similar purpose to Gold, Bitcoin would need to increase at least 10x from it's peak of almost 1T market cap (gold=10T). If something might increase 10x, people are going to speculate on whether it will, which means very high volatility now, maybe not later.

@tylerblack32实际上，为了达到与黄金类似的目的，比特币需要从其近1吨市值（黄金=10吨）的峰值至少增加10倍。如果某个数据可能会增加10倍，人们将猜测它是否会增加，这意味着现在的波动率非常高，可能不会太晚。