@Bill73957013 @wsbgnl Unfortunately it is now over 4000 and will probably continue to rise with the ongoing BA.5 (& BA.2.75?) wave.

@不幸的是，wsbgnl的账单73957013现在已经超过4000，并且可能会随着BA的进行而继续上涨。5（&BA.2.75？）波动

@happyhexer @wsbgnl And how do "Americans" use the ventilation tool anyway? Most places people go they have no visibility of the ventilation and even modest measures, such as San Fran requiring businesses to post a sign explaining their ventilation, were never pushed nationally and dropped in SF

@HappyHere@wsbgnl和“美国人”如何使用通风工具？人们去的大多数地方都看不见通风情况，甚至一些适度的措施，比如旧金山要求企业张贴一个解释其通风情况的标志，也从未在全国范围内推行，而是在旧金山实施

@wsbgnl @n_hold If tools were things that actually work better, for example avoiding the three Cs, the results might be different.

@wsbgl@n_hold如果工具实际上工作得更好，例如避免三个C，结果可能会不同。

@JustToReadTwee3 @ASlavitt And by the way, consider the MANY other 5-10M or larger cities which DIDN'T have months of lockdown and still don't have covid circulating at a high level. How is that?
Masks, testing, tracing, quarantines, de-densification, etc. They work.

@顺便说一句，想想其他许多5-1000万或更大的城市，这些城市没有数月的封锁，新冠肺炎仍然没有高水平传播。这是怎么回事？
口罩、测试、追踪、隔离、去密度等，它们都能工作。

@JustToReadTwee3 @ASlavitt "zero results" because covid still ripped through the entire country and continues to circulate at high levels.
Oh right, it didn't and doesn't.

@JustToReadTwee3@ASlavitt“零结果”，因为新冠肺炎仍在全国蔓延，并继续在高水平传播。
哦，对了，它没有也没有。

@JustToReadTwee3 @ASlavitt Yes do look at China where a handful of cities representing <10% of the population had multi-month lockdowns, the rest didn't ever (or at least not since 2020), and all of it has very low to no transmission.
"Didn't work"

@JustToReadTwee3@ASlavitt是的，看看中国，那里有几个城市代表<；10%的人口被封锁了几个月，其余的没有（至少自2020年以来没有），所有这些都有很低甚至没有传播。
“不起作用”

@NickFreiling @yishan The printing into a fundamentally shrinking economy likely created the inflation which is why you have the peculiar combination of recession, inflation, and low unemployment at the same time.

@NickFleiling@yishan印刷业进入了一个根本性的萎缩的经济，这很可能造成了通货膨胀，这就是为什么你同时面临衰退、通货膨胀和低失业率的特殊组合。

@LongCovidHell @MeetJess Accurate data on spread in schools is most certainly NOT wanted.

@LongCovidHell@MeetJess关于学校传播的准确数据肯定是不需要的。

@yishan Many of those "retired" people still had jobs (even if part time) and a good number of the rest helped with child care. Take out the child care and you take out a worker even if perfectly healthy.

@义山许多“退休”的人仍然有工作（即使是兼职），其余的很多人帮助照顾孩子。即使非常健康，你也可以让一个工人去照顾孩子。

@DataDrivenMD Probably because the product links in the article pay commissions.

@DataDrivenMD可能是因为文章中的产品链接支付佣金。

@johnvmcdonnell I like either of these since you can then add
YYYYMMDDHHMMSS.UUUUUU
and it still sorts.

@JohnMcDonnell我喜欢这两个，因为你可以添加
YYYYMMDDHHMMSS。uuuuu
它仍然可以排序。

@xabitron1 Try 3M VFlex if it fits. It's probably the most breathable respirator I've ever used, easier to breathe than some surgical.

@xabitron1如果合适的话，试试3M VFlex。这可能是我用过的最透气的口罩，比外科手术更容易呼吸。

@AbraarKaran @farid__jalali Implementation is needed more than innovation.
Demanding innovation rather than using what we know works has the effect of kicking the can, although I acknowledge that YOU in particularly may not intend this.

@AbraarKaran@farid\uu jalali实施比创新更重要。
要求创新，而不是使用我们所知道的作品，会产生踢人的效果，尽管我承认你们可能特别不打算这样做。

@DrBobsInsights @ASlavitt Vaccines are no longer particularly effective in controlling replications. They need to be stacked with other measures to reduce transmission.

@DrBobsInsights@ASlavitt疫苗在控制复制方面不再特别有效。它们需要与其他措施叠加以减少传播。

@Teheimar @ASlavitt Exactly. One widely spreading variant every few months is a huge problem. One every few years is manageable.

@Teheimar@ASlavitt没错。每隔几个月就会有一种广泛传播的变体，这是一个巨大的问题。每隔几年一次是可以控制的。

@ASlavitt There most certainly are "scientific" ways to keep up or stay ahead, including stacking scientific measures such as ventilation/filtration, de-densifying, masking, testing, tracing, quarantines, etc.
There is no scientific way to keep up or stay ahead with just vaccines.

@ASlavitt最肯定的是有“科学”的方法来保持或保持领先，包括堆叠科学措施，如通风/过滤、去密度、掩蔽、测试、跟踪、隔离等。
仅仅依靠疫苗是没有科学方法跟上或保持领先的。

@carrolltowing @ASlavitt https://www.nbclosangeles.com/...

@卡罗尔·拉维特https://www.nbclosangeles.com/...

@EnemyInAState How many of the health workers infected are male?

@EnemyInAState感染的卫生工作者中有多少是男性？

@Magic14272090 @myrabatchelder @kprather88 That analogy is ridiculous (screen door on submarine = certain flooding and sinking) and you should know that it long predates the "high contagiousness of new variants". Stop.
Accurate info on degrees of protection = good messaging.
No masks/mandates unless ideal = bad messaging

@Magic14272090@myrabatchelder@kprather88这个类比很荒谬（潜艇上的屏蔽门=某些洪水和下沉），你应该知道，它早在“新变种的高度传染性”之前就存在了。停止
关于防护等级的准确信息=良好的信息。
没有掩码/命令，除非理想=错误消息

@Magic14272090 @grankfimes @myrabatchelder @kprather88 Less virus means less exposure, some infections avoided (also possibly milder, as you say). Infection doesn't happen instantly, doesn't happen at all levels of ventilation or crowding, etc.
Agree, should not imply false sense of security, info on degrees of protection important

@Magic14272090@granktimes@myrabatchelder@kprather88病毒越少意味着接触越少，避免了一些感染（正如你所说，也可能更温和）。感染不会立即发生，也不会发生在通风或拥挤的所有级别。
同意，不应暗示虚假的安全感，重要的防护等级信息