@devtooligan @fubuloubu 1. Math safe by default. No "stack too deep" ever.
2. vs Python... It's not quite Python, though Python syntax highlight works. Things like HashMap instead of dict etc
@devtooligan@fubuloubu 1。默认情况下，数学是安全的。永远不要“堆得太深”。
2.vs Python。。。虽然Python语法高亮显示可以工作，但它并不完全是Python。比如HashMap而不是dict等等
RT: Given that a few of Andre's projects will go offline in about a month, I've put up a mirror website for his veCRV bribe system: https://vecrv-bribes.llama.air...
I won't develop this any further, but I've heard some veCRV users would still like to use this system, hence I'm just mirroring
RT：考虑到安德烈的一些项目将在大约一个月内离线，我为他的veCRV贿赂系统建立了一个镜像网站：https://vecrv-bribes.llama.air...
我不会进一步开发这个系统，但我听说一些veCRV用户仍然希望使用这个系统，因此我只是在镜像
@eth_is_more @CFrogE1 @CurveCap @Uniswap https://v2pools.com/ is a good independent page which tracks that. https://v2pools.com/cvx-eth/ and https://v2pools.com/crv-eth/ are nice examples
@eth_是_more@CFrogE1@CurveCap@Uniswaphttps://v2pools.com/这是一个很好的独立页面，可以跟踪它。https://v2pools.com/cvx-eth/和https://v2pools.com/crv-eth/这些都是很好的例子
@josephdelong Smart contracts don't need so many engineers, and for some writing them is irresistable fun!
@josephdelong智能合同不需要那么多工程师，对一些人来说，编写智能合同是一种不可抗拒的乐趣！
@IdleRentier @K_mpec80 Pretty much, yes. With convex votes, we're ignoring bribes 👀
@IdleRentier@K_mpec80差不多，是的。对于凸投票，我们忽略了贿赂👀
Due to sudden CVX unlock, these votes (for pools on Avalanche) didn't get a quorum on convex. If you have some veCRV voting power - please vote, it's cheap to do so now!
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...,
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...
由于CVX突然解锁，这些投票（针对雪崩上的游泳池）在凸面上没有达到法定人数。如果你有一些veCRV投票权，请投票，现在这样做很便宜！
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...,
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...
Wow. Ethereum is so cheap to use right now! This swap costed under $5 in transaction fees
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0226...
哇！以太坊现在使用起来非常便宜！这项掉期交易的交易费用不到5美元
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0226...
@K_mpec80 Not exactly volume but yeah. Also some pools may be saturated already while others would increase revenues if TVL increases
@K_mpec80不完全是音量，但是的。此外，一些资金池可能已经饱和，而如果TVL增加，其他资金池将增加收入
@K_mpec80 Good question. No good way to measure volume trustlessly, so there would be some volume oracles. But also, a cool way could be to give such bribes which bring more in pools which earn more
@好问题。没有可靠的测量音量的好方法，所以会有一些音量预言。但同时，一种很酷的方式可能是行贿，这样可以在收入更高的泳池里带来更多收入
RT: @CurveFinance The devs at Llama Airforce (@0xAlunara , Benny) built this cool infographic that updates fees to emissions ratio on a weekly basis:
https://llama.airforce/#/curve...
转发：@CurveFinance骆驼空军（@0xAlunara，Benny）的开发人员制作了这个很酷的信息图表，每周更新费用与排放的比率：
https://llama.airforce/#/curve...
When cryptocurrency protocols are young, token emissions often overweight the revenues. For example, Bitcoin emissions are still much larger than fees.
Here are some pools on https://curve.fi/ which brought more fees than they took CRV emissions in the last 24 hours https://t.co/6EnNqlrYiE
当加密货币协议还很年轻时，代币的排放往往会增加收入。例如，比特币的排放量仍然远远大于收费。
这里有一些游泳池https://curve.fi/这带来的费用超过了过去24小时内CRV排放的费用https://t.co/6EnNqlrYiE
@nvy_0x @StatusNub @YettyWapp @iearnfinance @saddlefinance NFT was received kind of "for free", so not much added risk to give it to a service with a similar risk profile to stake?
Anyhow, "partnership" is probably a red flag in DeFi (was such in ICO era in 2017 already). "Some of our customers" list is probably better?
@nvy_0x@StatusNub@YettyApp@iearnfinance@saddlefinance NFT是“免费”接收的，所以将其提供给风险状况与股份类似的服务不会增加多少风险？
无论如何，“伙伴关系”可能是DeFi的一个危险信号（在2017年的ICO时代已经是这样）。“我们的一些客户”名单可能更好？
@nvy_0x @mcchadald @iearnfinance @saddlefinance Hmm, ok. I (the one tweeting) didn't read that it was called partnership. It shouldn't be. But indeed, we are using them to handle the NFT
@nvy_0x@mcchadald@iearnfinance@saddlefinance嗯，好的。我（发推特的那个人）没有读到这叫做合作。不应该。但事实上，我们正在使用它们来处理NFT
@nvy_0x @mcchadald @iearnfinance @saddlefinance Hmm... Imagine Tetranode putting his liquidity on Curve via Convex. Did Tetra partner with Convex and Curve?
@nvy_0x@mcchadald@iearnfinance@saddlefinance嗯。。。想象一下Tetranode通过凸面将他的流动性放在曲线上。Tetra是否与凸面和曲线搭档？
@nvy_0x @iearnfinance @saddlefinance Receiving an airdrop was never a safety indicator
@nvy_0x@iearnfinance@saddlefinance收到空投从来都不是安全指标