@YettyWapp @CurveCap Looks like trying to use coingecko lol

@YettyApp@CurveCap看起来像是在尝试使用coingecko lol

@danrobinson macrotokenomics.

@丹罗宾逊宏观经济学。

@vefunder @StatefulWorks @trent_vanepps @_bout3fiddy_ @TimBeiko Honestly, it is not the best idea to use veFunder for this. It's probably better for the DAO to vote for some funding from the DAO's CRV allocation (which exists and was a little bit used for Curve grants)

@vefunder@StatefulWorks@trent_vanepps@bout3fiddy_uu@TimBeiko老实说，使用vefunder不是最好的方法。DAO最好从DAO的CRV拨款中投票获得一些资金（该拨款已经存在，并且有一点用于曲线拨款）

RT: $sGNO / $GNO pool on @curvefinance is now live 🌊
Welcome to liquid staking on Gnosis Chain 💯 https://t.co/Ea2pQczcOF

转发：@curvefinance上的sGNO/$GNO pool现已上线🌊
欢迎来到灵知链上的液体赌注💯 https://t.co/Ea2pQczcOF

RT: hot tip
be super careful when googling crypto stuff
first results often an ad with a name/address very similar to official projects, designed to take your money. https://t.co/OCMF6brghA

RT：热提示
在谷歌上搜索加密内容时要格外小心
第一个结果通常是一个名称/地址与官方项目非常相似的广告，旨在拿走你的钱。https://t.co/OCMF6brghA

RT: @LendFlareOffic @CurveFinance @ConvexFinance @LFT_Terry Beautiful. It looks rug proof! https://t.co/Z4q8OAMc5L

转发：@LendFlareOffice@CurveFinance@ConvexFinance@LFT_Terry Beautiful。它看起来像地毯！https://t.co/Z4q8OAMc5L

@SerendipityXBT wdym? Llama sweaters are demanded?

“偶然的”？需要打电话的毛衣吗？

@ne1k0 @Rewkang It's tunable, but there is a hardcoded upper limit of 50% in most pools

@ne1k0@Rewkang它是可调的，但在大多数池中有一个硬编码的上限50%

@ne1k0 Absolutely. It is possible that 100% fee is actually better (was proposed by @Rewkang at some point) (not possible with existing pools, but should we make possible for new ones?).

@绝对是ne1k0。有可能100%的费用实际上更好（由@Rewkang在某个时候提出）（现有池不可能，但我们是否应该为新池提供可能？）。

@ne1k0 The math is:
- 0.21% APY on all 3pool TVL is going to the DAO
- 0.53% of CRV APR is paid to 18.8% of the 3pool TVL which makes it 0.099% APR of the expense
So for this pool, DAO is doing a consistent net profit

@ne1k0数学是：
-所有3pool TVL上0.21%的APY将被分配给DAO
-CRV APR的0.53%支付给3pool TVL的18.8%，这意味着其APR费用的0.099%
因此，对于这个池，DAO的净利润是一致的

@ne1k0 Very true. But for 3pool in particular - don't forget that it's 50% of _all_ the pool fees which is going to DAO, while it's only the staked 3LP which are receiving CRV. And there are only 18.8% of 3LPs staked in gauge https://t.co/Qg8nyX18wA

@ne1k0非常正确。但特别是对于3pool，不要忘了DAO将获得50%的池费，而只有下注的3LP将获得CRV。而在3个LP中，只有18.8%押在了gauge上https://t.co/Qg8nyX18wA

@crypto_condom @stablekwon Keep in mind that this is a poll on what makes sense to deploy - not a formal governance vote!

@crypto_避孕套@stablekwon请记住，这是一项关于部署哪些内容合理的民意调查，而不是正式的治理投票！

@MakerDAO Moar!

@马克多·摩尔！

RT: The cCRV gauge contract is a custom implementation, which should not be encouraged without scrutiny. Custom @CurveFinance gauge implementations should be accompanied by core-dev guidance, and not without.
Please vote against the cCRV gauge proposal.

RT：cCRV量规合同是一种定制实施，不应在未经审查的情况下予以鼓励。定制@CurveFinance量表的实施应该附带核心开发指南，而不是没有。
请投票反对cCRV仪表提案。

RT: If you're looking to join the Curve Wars you must look at this: people who bribe thru Votium for gauge weight is paying about $0.07 weekly per veCRV. On the other hand, Abra, Curve and Convex pay less than half by bribing veCRV (using this contract https://etherscan.io/address/0...) https://t.co/ByBLXFVyGC

RT：如果你想加入曲线战争，你必须看一看：通过Votium行贿以获得测量体重的人每周为每辆veCRV支付大约0.07美元。另一方面，Abra、Curve和Convex通过贿赂veCRV（使用本合同）支付的报酬不到一半https://etherscan.io/address/0...) https://t.co/ByBLXFVyGC

@shegenerates What if it is means ETH² though

@但如果是这样，她会怎样呢

@tbr90 @VotiumProtocol @ConvexFinance There is native bribing though

@tbr90@VotiumProtocol@ConvexFinance尽管存在本土贿赂行为

@DefiMoon Still don’t understand what do they make from those games. Wars like that are expensive

@我仍然不明白他们从这些游戏中得到了什么。那样的战争代价高昂

RT: Have pity on the stranded veCRV. They’re getting screwed in bribes because protocols only know how to bribe thru Votium. But that’s great for protocols like Abracadabra cuz they’re been getting a steal in gauge weight. #BribesAreNotAllCreatedEqual https://t.co/uSa4G1JfFM

RT：可怜这辆搁浅的车吧。他们在受贿，因为协议只知道如何通过Votium行贿。但这对Abracadabra这样的协议来说是很好的，因为他们的标准重量一直很便宜#贿赂https://t.co/uSa4G1JfFM

There is a poll for veCRV holders linked from the discussion, also. If you have veCRV - please vote also! Poll is just for signaling so it is offchain and requires no gas https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...

还有一项针对veCRV持有者的民调也与讨论有关。如果你有veCRV，也请投票！Poll仅用于发送信号，因此它是非连锁的，不需要汽油https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...