@JonGalt14 @RektHQ @nytimes Of course Rekt story is better. They are the professionals!
@JonGalt14@RektHQ@nytimes当然，Rekt故事更好。他们是专业人士！
CRV 的最新消息
This near-record fee claim (again) is up (already for a few hours)! If you have veCRV, staked cvxCRV or staked sdCRV - you can claim those (although the two latter ones stream over a week) https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...
"How I learned to stop worrying and love the bera". Another week was excellent for admin fees - arrives to veCRV holders tomorrow! https://t.co/NKrlRMUymB
发表时间：4年前 作者：Curve Finance @CurveFinance这一近乎创纪录的费用索赔（再次）上升了（已经持续了几个小时）！如果您有veCRV、下注cvxCRV或下注sdCRV，您可以申请这些（尽管后两种会持续一周）https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...
“我是如何学会停止担忧，爱上贝拉的”。另一周的管理费非常好——明天就到了veCRV持有人那里！https://t.co/NKrlRMUymB
@dragonCT88 Nothing special. Near-record-high admin fees over the last week: working very well in bear markets, bringing those fees to CRV lockers
@dragonCT88没什么特别的。上周管理费接近历史新高：在熊市中表现良好，将这些费用带到CRV储物柜
And this one is also not bad at all: thanks to high fees over the last week https://t.co/fTQAzJHZZW
这一点也不坏：多亏了上周的高额费用https://t.co/fTQAzJHZZW
@boneexchange Well, theory is: if it's only redeem fee but not mint fee - gonna be p=1.000 in the bull market and p=0.999 (10 bps away) in the bear market
@boneexchange的理论是：如果只是赎回费而不是造币费，那么在牛市时p=1.000，在熊市时p=0.999（10个基点）
@VishalJ75372612 We actually did wait for a while here. Anyhow, this is still a vote, not a sudden emergency kill
@VishalJ75372612实际上我们在这里等了一段时间。无论如何，这仍然是一次投票，不是突然的紧急杀戮
A vote to ramp down A from 5000 to 2000 for 3pool. It appears that $USDT has 10bps redemption fee, so arbitrage stops 10 bps away from peg. It means that the liquidity should be less concentrated to have good liquidity even 10 bps away.
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/para... https://t.co/Mv913nBx5P
投票决定将3pool从5000人降至2000人。美元兑美元的赎回费似乎有10个基点，因此套利可以阻止10个基点脱离挂钩。这意味着流动性应该不那么集中，以获得良好的流动性，即使距离10个基点。
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/para...https://t.co/Mv913nBx5P
@MrT09613720 Well. $USDT showed that it is well redeemable. $LUSD is arguably safer then $DAI (minus the chainlink risk though). $GUSD, $BUSD, paxos $USDP are solid USD-backed coins. Unit's $USDP, $MIM seem sensible also (collateral is riskier than DAI and LUSD though).
@MrT09613720井$USDT表明它是完全可以赎回的$可以说，LUSD比美元DAI更安全（不过要减去链环风险）$GUSD、BUSD、paxos$USDP是美元支持的坚固货币。该部门的美元/便士、百万美元似乎也很合理（尽管抵押品的风险高于DAI和LUSD）。
@MrT09613720 Do said that 4pool means that Curve Wars are over. No 4pool = not over?
@MrT09613720表示4pool意味着曲线战争已经结束。否4pool=未结束？
A proposal to stop all emissions to UST-related gauges (regardless on whether one weight-votes or not).
Good bye UST - it was a good experiment, but it didn't work out: UST supply grew much larger than Luna liquidity which can absorb redemptions.
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...
停止所有排放至UST相关仪表的提案（无论是否有一个重量投票）。
再见，UST——这是一个很好的实验，但没有成功：UST的供应量比Luna liquidity增长了很多，Luna liquidity可以吸收赎回。
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...
@FatManTerra @stablegains Ok, so *this* is what SEC is supposed to look at
@FatManTerra@stablegains好的，所以这是SEC应该看的
@danny_harbor This week is mostly from the overall crypto crash. Last week is mostly from UST fiasco.
That said, pools try to resist those movements and save the day while possible (taking the fees for that obviously)
@danny\u harbor这周主要是因为整个加密系统崩溃。上周主要是来自UST的惨败。
也就是说，游泳池试图抵制这些运动，在可能的情况下节省时间（显然要为此支付费用）
@danny_harbor @_bout3fiddy_ @CurveCap Factory doesn't necessarily mean "bad", nonfactory doesn't necessarily mean good. Good resource though to read research done by others is this one: https://cryptorisks.substack.c...
@danny\u harbor@\u bout3fiddy\u@CurveCap工厂不一定意味着“坏”，非工厂不一定意味着好。阅读他人研究的好资源是：https://cryptorisks.substack.c...
RT: There’s a proposal to remove UST related gauges:
https://gov.curve.fi/t/proposa...
RT：有人建议移除UST相关仪表：
https://gov.curve.fi/t/proposa...
"How I learned to stop worrying and love the bera". Another week was excellent for admin fees - arrives to veCRV holders tomorrow! https://t.co/NKrlRMUymB
“我是如何学会停止担忧，爱上贝拉的”。另一周的管理费非常好——明天就到了veCRV持有人那里！https://t.co/NKrlRMUymB
@TokenBrice Two months is in the code of the pools themselves actually, not in the DAO
@TokenBrice两个月实际上在池本身的代码中，而不是在DAO中