So depeg insurance worked, after all? https://twitter.com/UnslashedF...

那么，德佩格保险公司到底起了作用？https://twitter.com/UnslashedF...

@KaretaKarate @consensus2022 @vyperlang Jokes on you ser https://t.co/wyzVFTGhGi

@KaretaKarate@consensus2022@vyperlang开你玩笑https://t.co/wyzVFTGhGi

If you love Python and want to try writing smart contracts in something Pythonic - here's a good chance: @consensus2022 hackathon in Texas will have some good @vyperlang presence! https://twitter.com/eomjipark/...

如果您喜欢Python并想尝试用Python语言编写智能合约，那么这里有一个很好的机会：@consences2022 hackathon在德克萨斯州将有一些很好的@vyperlang存在！https://twitter.com/eomjipark/...

@alpeh_v @big_tech_sux Absolutely, sneks are kid-friendly and playful

@alpeh\u v@big\u tech\u sux绝对，sneks是儿童友好型和顽皮型

@DefiMoon While that is cool - this is betting on crypto not going lower?

@DefiMoon虽然很酷，但这是在押注加密不会降低？

RT: Hey @CurveFinance veCRV holders
did you know that @TheTNetwork is incentivizing you week after week to vote for teth pool gauge weight ?
just head over to https://app.warden.vote/quest/ from our @Paladin_vote frens
omg these rewards 😎🤑🧐🤑😎 https://twitter.com/Figue_me/s... https://t.co/YbbTqNfme1

RT：嘿@CurveFinance veCRV持有人
你知道吗，@TheTNetwork正在激励你一周又一周地投票支持特思游泳池标准体重？
直接去https://app.warden.vote/quest/来自我们的@Paladin\u投票朋友
天哪，这些奖励😎🤑🧐🤑😎 https://twitter.com/Figue_me/s... https://t.co/YbbTqNfme1

RT: ✨ Introducing "VyperExamples": An introduction to writing Vyper smart contracts using simple examples.
https://www.vyperexamples.com/

转发：✨ 介绍“VyperExamples”：介绍如何使用简单示例编写Vyper智能合约。
https://www.vyperexamples.com/

So 3pool USDT balance stabilizes around 60% (down from 75%) https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...

因此，3pool USDT余额稳定在60%左右（低于75%）https://twitter.com/CurveFinan...

RT: Someone set up a veFunder proposal without a single discussion. Vote against this one. @ConvexFinance @CurveFinance @CurveCap
Convex Finance - [Curve] Ownership DAO Vote ID: 186 https://vote.convexfinance.com...
Yes. Anyone can set up a veFunder gauge. But at least tell us why.

RT：有人在没有任何讨论的情况下就提出了维芬德的提案。投反对票@ConvexFinance@CurveFinance@CurveCap
凸财务-[曲线]所有权DAO投票ID:186https://vote.convexfinance.com...
对任何人都可以设置veFunder仪表。但至少告诉我们为什么。

RT: The stDOT/xcDOT @CurveFinance pool is live:
https://moonbeam.curve.fi/fact...
@LidoFinance 🤝 @MixBytes 🤝 @CurveFinance 🤝 @MoonbeamNetwork https://t.co/ELyS8qDFtf

转发：stDOT/xcDOT@CurveFinance池处于活动状态：
https://moonbeam.curve.fi/fact...
@LidoFinance公司🤝 @混合字节数🤝 @曲线金融🤝 @月球波束网络https://t.co/ELyS8qDFtf

@SalomonCrypto @Tetranode @JPEGd_69 No threats at all. Just a recommendation how to make it safer. Which is, either can increase the cap, or reduce rewards - otherwise it's bound to be unbalanced.
But looking at the messages, seems like the best effort will be done!

@SalomonCrypto@Tetranode@JPEG\U 69完全没有威胁。只是一个如何让它更安全的建议。也就是说，要么增加上限，要么减少奖励——否则肯定会不平衡。
但看看这些信息，似乎会尽最大努力！

Pool for liquid staking for @Polkadot! https://twitter.com/MixBytes/s...

用于@Polkadot！的液体立桩池！https://twitter.com/MixBytes/s...

RT: 🥳 stDOT+xcDOT @CurveFinance Pool with @LidoFinance LDO LP Rewards launched on @MoonbeamNetwork! https://mixbytes.io/blog/stdot...

转发：🥳 stDOT+xcDOT@CurveFinance Pool和@LidoFinance LDO LP奖励在@MoonbeamNetwork上推出！https://mixbytes.io/blog/stdot...

@Tetranode @JPEGd_69 Just make sure that all the obtainable PUSD will be definitely enough to make the we pool 50/50! Maybe a higher debt ceiling is needed for that

@Tetranode@JPEG\U 69只需确保所有可获得的PUSD绝对足以使我们各占一半！也许需要更高的债务上限

@Tetranode @JPEGd_69 Definitely! But sounds like a higher PUSD supply is also necessary for that?

@Tetranode@JPEG\U 69绝对！但听起来更高的PUSD供应也是必要的？

@LefterisJP Wait are you saying that emacs doesn't allow you to write bad things?

@LefterisJP等等，你是说emacs不允许你写坏事？

@abcampbell ELI5 is not easy but it's this.
Imagine that currently 20/80 pool has p=1.07 at A=50. If A ramps to 25 AND pool stays 20/80, price will pump to 1.14.
Then someone who's waited on sidelines can mint and sell to the pool. Then, when pool rebalances in future, LPs appear in loss

@abcampbell ELI5并不容易，但就是这样。
假设当前20/80池在A=50时p=1.07。如果价格上升到25，而游泳池保持在20/80，价格将升至1.14。
然后，那些在场外等待的人可以造币并出售给泳池。然后，当池未来重新平衡时，有限合伙人出现亏损

It wouldn't be a big loss to them, but we'd recommend to vote "no" until there are more collaterals added

这对他们来说并不是什么大损失，但我们建议投反对票，直到增加更多抵押品

There is a proposal to lower A for PUSD pool from 50 to 25. Could only be good right?
Not really. Even if all the limits to mint PUSD are used, it won't be enough to balance the pool. So lowering A = algopump. And who pays? LPs who are late to withdraw
https://vote.convexfinance.com...

有人建议将PUSD池的a从50降低到25。只能是好的对吧？
不是真的。即使使用了mint PUSD的所有限制，也不足以平衡池。因此，降低A=algopump。谁来付钱？延迟退出的有限合伙人
https://vote.convexfinance.com...

@Crypnovice88 It actually has nothing to do with that risk.
Due to 10 bps redeem (but not mint!) fee, USDT can be either at 1.000 in bull market or at 0.999 in bear market.
To accommodate for BOTH prices and all in between, A should be lower than 5000

@Crypnovice88它实际上与这种风险无关。
由于10个基点的兑换（但不是薄荷糖！）费用，USDT可以在牛市为1.000美元，也可以在熊市为0.999美元。
为了适应这两种价格以及两者之间的所有价格，A应低于5000