Great video in Chinese
https://youtu.be/ahaEZX7CAF8
中文视频很棒
https://youtu.be/ahaEZX7CAF8
CRV 的最新消息
@big_tech_sux @bantg Wait. Does it turn out to be faster than via evm guts?
@big\u tech\u sux@bantg等等。它是否比通过evm guts更快？
Interesting Twitter space in Chinese happening now
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1...
有趣的中文推特空间正在发生
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1...
RT: It seems that all permissionlessly created Curve v2 pools are now sourced by ParaSwap.
@paraswap @CurveFinance https://t.co/t2dJS5NXbA
RT：似乎所有未经许可创建的Curve v2池现在都由ParaSwap提供。
@CurveFinance的paraswaphttps://t.co/t2dJS5NXbA
@0xngmi It’s a Scrödinger TVL. Cannot say until you observe
@0xngmi这是一个Scrödinger TVL。除非你观察，否则无法说出
@DefiMoon @hodlnautdotcom While not without risks, they could try sETH pool.
But with any "same but different" asset - they are probably taking risks themselves (and that's ok if that's what they do) (hopefully not users who gave them ETH, without knowning)
@DefiMoon@hodlnautdotcom虽然不是没有风险，但他们可以试试sETH pool。
但对于任何“相同但不同”的资产，他们可能自己也在冒险（如果他们是这样做的话，那也没关系）（希望不是给他们ETH的用户，不知道）
@hexonaut @ChrisBlec @bantg “Direct democracy cannot work”, they said
@他们说，hexonaut@ChrisBlec@bantg“直接民主是行不通的”
@synthetix_io @chriflu1 @chainlink Exactly!
@synthetix\u io@chriflu1@chainlink准确！
@DegenerousDefi @chriflu1 @synthetix_io There are few pools which do not use external price sources!
@DegenerousDefi@chriflu1@synthetix\u io很少有不使用外部价格来源的池！
@DegenerousDefi @chriflu1 @synthetix_io Because price sources are taken from elephant shit old tradfi venues who do not trade on weekends. So, to derisk the system, Synthetix needs to not use that price on weekends
@DegenerousDefi@chriflu1@synthetix\u io，因为价格来源来自大象屎旧的tradfi场馆，这些场馆周末不交易。因此，为了降低系统的成本，Synthetix不需要在周末使用这个价格
@chriflu1 @synthetix_io Though only for certain currencies like eur
@chriflu1@synthetix\u io，但仅适用于欧元等特定货币
@chriflu1 @synthetix_io Synthetix stops it’s swaps every weekend
@chriflu1@synthetix\u io synthetix每个周末都会停止掉期交易
@mrfelixeth @WormholeOracle Feels like they are starting to accept it more than before. But hard to say yet
@Felixeth先生@WormholeOracle觉得他们开始比以前更接受它了。但现在还很难说
@mrfelixeth @WormholeOracle No regulation is better than bad regulation. Good regulation is better then no regulation.
If regulators accept defi ethos - it’s only a good thing. If they search for financial intermediaries when they don’t exist - probably not.
@mrfelixeth@WormholeCoracle没有规则总比糟糕的规则好。良好的监管比没有监管好。
如果监管者接受defi精神，那只是一件好事。如果他们在金融中介不存在的时候寻找金融中介——可能不存在。
This vote (incentives for SETH pool on @optimismPBC) is important for Atomic Swaps via @synthetix_io there
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...
这一票（对@optimismPBC上赛斯池的奖励）对于通过@synthetix\u io进行的原子交换非常重要
https://dao.curve.fi/vote/owne...
@WormholeOracle Nah, regulators have good goals. Some of them might be stuck with rules which are revolving around custodial world. But they learn and improve!
In defi everything is non-custodial and very transparent. Same goals would end up with different regulations with such properties.
@WormholeOracle不，监管机构有很好的目标。他们中的一些人可能会被围绕监护世界的规则所束缚。但他们会学习和提高！
在defi中，一切都是非托管的，非常透明。相同的目标最终会导致对此类属性的不同规定。
RT: 同时，通过 @CurveFinance ，实现了和外部流动性的链接，从而捕捉更多的交易量 https://t.co/L1zsqn3f1C
转发： 同时，通过 @CurveFinance ，实现了和外部流动性的链接，从而捕捉更多的交易量 https://t.co/L1zsqn3f1C
@NamecheapCEO @augginator @LefterisJP @Alexintosh bribed?
@NamecheapCEO@augginator@LefterisJP@Alexintosh受贿？