@james1chas3 @ReutersUS With no masks being accompanied by jill biden without a mask. Pure crisis.

@james1chas3@ReutersUS没有面具，吉尔·拜登没有面具陪伴。纯粹的危机。

@QuentinJKenned1 @BirdAppAnt @JStein_WaPo I agree with you about making changes. There are far too many ideologues pushing the myth that science = unchanging. Actually opposite is true.

@QuentinJKenned1@birdapant@JStein_WaPo我同意你关于做出改变的看法。有太多的理论家宣扬科学=不变的神话。事实上相反是正确的。

@JellyKind @JStein_WaPo Yeah it's a mess.

@JellyKind@JStein_WaPo是的，真是一团糟。

@JellyKind @JStein_WaPo Also, it's not the case that individuals will always ignore it either. They usually don't want to infect their friends, family, etc. If CDC says you're safe after 5 days that's going to result in different behavior from saying you're safe after 5 days with a negative test.

@JellyKind@JStein_WaPo同样，个人也不会总是忽视它。他们通常不想感染他们的朋友、家人等。如果疾病预防控制中心说你在5天后安全，这将导致不同的行为，而不是说你在5天后通过阴性检测是安全的。

@JellyKind @JStein_WaPo Major employers defining covid policy won't ignore it, that's what matters.
If people want to ignore CDC and go out to a bar, they're going to do it no matter what CDC recommends.

@JellyKind@JStein_WaPo定义新冠病毒政策的主要雇主不会忽视它，这才是重要的。
如果人们想忽视疾病控制中心而去酒吧，不管疾病控制中心推荐什么，他们都会去。

@BirdAppAnt @QuentinJKenned1 @JStein_WaPo There were numerous public statements from Fauci Walensky and maybe others that it was for economic reasons. They were suggestive of critical infrastructure but when you have the same rules being applied to non-CI jobs and airlines which are now mostly vacation travel...

@Birdapant@QuentinJKenned1@JStein_WaPo福西·瓦伦斯基（Fauci Walensky）和其他人曾多次公开声明这是出于经济原因。他们暗示了关键的基础设施，但当你有同样的规则被应用到非CI工作和航空公司，现在大部分是度假旅游。。。

@JellyKind @JStein_WaPo Also, they're probably going to recommend a rapid test, not PCR.

@JellyKind@JStein_WaPo同样，他们可能会建议进行快速检测，而不是PCR。

@JellyKind @JStein_WaPo It can't not be feasible. Worst case is you quarantine for the full 10 days. If you can get a test, and the test is negative, you get out early. Far from clear this is worse in any way than going out and infecting more people including coworkers.

@JellyKind@JStein_WaPo这不可能。最糟糕的情况是你被隔离了整整10天。如果你能得到一个测试，而且测试结果是阴性的，你就可以早点出去。这远比外出感染更多人（包括同事）更糟糕，这一点还不清楚。

@obama_I_miss @JStein_WaPo He asked for testing. CDC took it out.

@奥巴马要求进行测试。疾控中心把它拿出来了。

@jd1515151 @FaireComments @eliowa @CovidDc Also how well do people actually wash their hands before blowing whatever is left into the air.

@jd1515151@FaireComments@eliowa@CovidDc还有，人们在把剩下的东西吹到空中之前洗手的效果如何。

@KawasakiKR11 Can't be used without proper training. Wrap yourself in a blanket or a heavy bedspread.

@没有适当的培训，川崎KR11不能使用。用毯子或厚重的床单裹住自己。

@LucioMM1 @DeniseTuart @AbraarKaran Your last statement is ridiculous. Touching a respirator does not reduce efficacy to zero. Even somewhat degraded fit factor still has some efficacy. There are studies showing decent filtration even with a short beard.

@LucioMM1@DeniseTuart@AbraarKaran你的最后一句话很荒谬。触摸呼吸器不会将功效降低到零。即使有点退化的拟合因子仍然有一些功效。有研究表明，即使留着短胡子，过滤效果也不错。

@thoaidngo @AbraarKaran Institutionally incapable.

@thoaidngo@AbraarKaran在制度上没有能力。

@AbraarKaran It is extremely "odd" that something that was entirely an improvized solution to a shortage (cloth masks) persists as a solution. Shows extreme dysfunction.
The inconsistency with respirators being recommended (including by CDC) for wildfires EVEN RIGHT NOW is more illustration.

@AbraarKaran非常“奇怪”的是，一些完全是临时解决短缺的办法（布面具）仍然作为解决办法存在。表现出极度的功能障碍。
即使是现在，与野火防护口罩（包括CDC）的建议不一致更能说明问题。

@GrittycityT @masknerd @US_FDA @CDCgov No the "for public use" models are long since discontinued, but there are very similar N95s labeled for occupational or medical use.

@GrittycityT@masknerd@US_FDA@CDCgov No“供公众使用”的型号早已停产，但也有非常类似的N95标签用于职业或医疗用途。

@AllieWag @michaelmina_lab @KillBrexitNow Employers, schools, etc. following the (better) state guidance rather than (asinine) CDC guidance will require a test and better masking. It's as simple as that. Doesn't require an average person to read the fine print.

@AllieWag@michaelmina_lab@KillBrexitNow雇主、学校等。遵循（更好的）国家指导而不是（愚蠢的）CDC指导将需要测试和更好的掩蔽。就这么简单。不需要一个普通人来阅读这些细节。

@AllieWag @KillBrexitNow @michaelmina_lab No, he is backing the MODIFIED version of it which ADDS testing and improved masking.

@AllieWag@KillBrexitNow@michaelmina_实验室不，他支持它的改进版本，该版本增加了测试和改进的掩蔽。

@michaelmina_lab @AllieWag @KillBrexitNow It's the nature of twitter that people OFTEN see tweets in a disconnected, out of context, manner (due to also surfacing, different retweets, etc.). Probably didn't see your others against CDC policy.

@michaelmina_lab@AllieWag@KillBrexit现在，twitter的本质是人们经常以一种断断续续、断章取义的方式看到推特（因为也会出现不同的转发，等等）。可能没看到你的其他人反对CDC的政策。

@AllieWag @KillBrexitNow @michaelmina_lab He hasn't backed it

@AllieWag@KillBrexitNow@michaelmina_实验室他没有支持

@KhalerJex @SimoneSassi @ianbremmer It's Lauren Sanchez. No, she isn't that interesting. But, hey, if he's happy, good for him.

@KhalerJex@SimoneSassi@ianbremmer我是Lauren Sanchez。不，她没那么有趣。但是，嘿，如果他高兴，对他有好处。