Aeon 的最新消息

@YammerPsaka @Playerinthgame It's complicated. There are a million layers, economic, historical, sociological, economic, political, etc.
The pure economic issue here is not actually moral hazard so much as adverse selection.

@YammerPsaka@Playerinthgame这很复杂。有一百万个层次,经济、历史、社会学、经济、政治等。
这里的纯经济问题实际上不是道德风险,而是逆向选择。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@YammerPsaka @Playerinthgame I don't understand the question.

@我不明白这个问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Playerinthgame Your government doesn't merely abet, it literally CREATED that system. But yeah, it doesn't do anything without lobbyists.

@玩游戏你们的政府不仅仅是教唆,它确实创造了这个系统。但是是的,没有说客它什么都做不了。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Playerinthgame Yep. I was answering the question of why "open enrollment" exists, not claiming it's a good thing.

@是的。我是在回答为什么存在“开放注册”的问题,而不是说这是一件好事。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Playerinthgame I actually agree. That's the last line.
Don't make it a product that you can buy or not buy and the problem goes away. The fire department isn't a product.

@玩这个游戏我真的同意。这是最后一行。
不要让它成为你能买或不能买的产品,问题就会消失。消防部门不是一个产品。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Playerinthgame It's not insurance if you only buy it when you need it.
Can't buy fire insurance while your house is burning.
Would be great for everyone to have good coverage all the time, but that's a different question.

@Playerinthgame如果你只在需要的时候买,那就不是保险了。
你的房子着火时不能买火灾保险。
对每个人来说都有好的报道是很好的,但这是一个不同的问题。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Playerinthgame To limit the impact of people signing up only when they get sick (or similarly switching to a more comprehensive, more expensive plan only when they need it)

@Playerinthgame限制人们只有在生病时才报名的影响(或者类似地,只有在需要时才转向更全面、更昂贵的计划)

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@farid__jalali @JHowardBrainMD @AtomsksSanakan @gorskon @MartinKulldorff @brownstoneinst @ZDoggMD Probably on a very expensive mattress.

@farid_uuJalali@JHowardBrainMD@atomssanakan@gorskon@MartinKulldorff@brownstoneinst@ZDoggMD可能在一张非常昂贵的床垫上。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@firasd @NateSilver538 If there were a comprehensive source of data on ER wait times, that would be useful.

@firasd@NateSilver538如果有一个关于ER等待时间的全面数据源,那将是有用的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@dunaskito @angie_rasmussen US citizens are exempt. That's a very fraction of international travel.

@dunaskito@angie_rasmussen美国公民可豁免。这只是国际旅行的一小部分。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@krupali @AbraarKaran @CDCDirector You're assuming she's calling the shots, and replacing her would do any good. May be true, may be not true.

@krupali@AbraarKaran@CDC主管你认为她是发号施令者,替换她会有任何好处。可能是真的,也可能不是真的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@CS_nft @spectatorindex ^ NYC

@CS u nft@观众指数^NYC

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@4stroboy__ It isn't possible to "amend" a post on twitter. I'll add a reply, that's fair.
Still, it isn't substantive. The vaccine efficacies are much the same everywhere, including NSW.

@4stroboy_uuu;不可能“修改”推特上的帖子。我会补充一个答案,这是公平的。
不过,这并不是实质性的。包括新南威尔士州在内的所有地方的疫苗效力几乎相同。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@4stroboy__ This is no misinformation here. Vaccines are highly effective in preventing hospitalizations and deaths in both NY and NSW.

@4stroboy_uu_u_u_u这不是错误的信息。在纽约和新南威尔士州,疫苗在预防住院和死亡方面非常有效。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@4stroboy__ The relevance was efficacy of vaccines (specifically for hospitalization and death), which from all the data you have provided, looks to be almost EXACTLY the same in NSW as in NY.
Thank you for adding additional support for the point.

@4stroboy_uuu u;从您提供的所有数据来看,新南威尔士州与纽约州的疫苗效力(特别是住院和死亡)几乎完全相同。
感谢您为这一点添加额外的支持。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@4stroboy__ The coin isn't relevant to this thread.
We engage with the community on a variety of topics.
Top level tweets are always coin announcements. Thread engagement aren't.
The coin project is maintained. If people want to buy it they can, if they don't that's okay too.

@4stroboy_uuu;硬币与此线无关。
我们与社区就各种主题进行接触。
顶级推文总是硬币公告。螺纹啮合不是。
coin项目得以维持。如果人们想买,他们可以买,如果他们不买,那也没关系。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@4stroboy__ I didn't "remove" the NY part, the chart didn't have it (I didn't even realize this).
About the same ratios exist everywhere, including NSW, as we've shown in this thread.
I don't know why you keep bringing up NY, except to distract.
The chart was not even misleading.

@4stroboy_uuu;我没有“删除”NY部分,图表上没有(我甚至没有意识到这一点)。
正如我们在这篇文章中所展示的,包括新南威尔士州在内的所有地方都存在着大致相同的比率。
我不知道你为什么老是提起纽约,只是为了分散注意力。
图表甚至没有误导。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@4stroboy__ The chart is accurate, and nothing you've shown here suggests it is any different anywhere else in the world, in fact about the same.

@4stroboy_uu_u_u_u_u_u_u_u_u____________________________。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@pyrmontvillage @walidgellad There is no quote there where he said his product was useless.
You should delete your tweet above, it is misinformation.

@pyrmontvillage@walidgellad没有引用他说他的产品是无用的。
你应该删除上面的推文,这是错误的信息。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情