@Justinredalen @bsbdunn @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan The debate upthread was $10K or $50K, or potentially phasing out relief at $125K income. Try again.

@Justinredalen@bsbdunn@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan争论的上限是1万美元或5万美元，或可能以12.5万美元的收入逐步取消救济。再试一次。

@ZonaWC03 @RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan You could try accomplishing things that people care about, such as student loan forgiveness. Do nothing but cry about propaganda = lose.
Enthusiasm gap is ENORMOUS and that's not due to Fox news because dems don't watch it.

@ZonaWC03@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan你可以尝试完成人们关心的事情，比如学生贷款减免。什么都不要做，只为宣传而哭泣=失败。
热情差距巨大，这不是因为福克斯新闻，因为民主党人不看。

@_ohcoco_ @tnicholsmd He teaches economics of health care, not medicine.

@_他教授的是医疗保健经济学，而不是医学。

@OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin The governors mostly take their cue from the national leadership. That was true under both 45 and 46. You can probably come up with a few who deviated slightly to the better in both cases, but not all that much.

@OXHarryH1@alexmeshkin州长们大多从国家领导层那里得到启示。在45岁和46岁时都是这样。在这两种情况下，你可能会找到一些稍微向更好的方向发展的人，但不是所有的人。

@OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin You can list a series of clear mistakes that started LONG before the mood of the country was (fairly marginally BTW) "be over". You don't dig a deep hole instantly, it takes many shovelfuls.

@OXHarryH1@alexmeshkin你可以列出一系列明显的错误，这些错误早在这个国家的情绪“结束”之前就已经开始了（顺便说一句，相当轻微）。你不需要立刻挖一个深洞，它需要很多铲。

@RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Mostly they're just going to stay home, same as any other discouraged voter. If you were a corn farmer in Iowa, promised farm subsides if you voted in your candidate, only to see them cut, you'd probably stay home too.

@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan大多数情况下，他们只会待在家里，就像其他沮丧的选民一样。如果你是爱荷华州的一名玉米种植者，如果你投票给你的候选人，却看到他们被砍掉，你可能也会呆在家里。

@OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin He's losing badly. There's not really an alternative politically that is worse. He's gotten bad advice on that too! Or gotten advice that wasn't so bad but implemented it poorly. Hard to tell the difference as an observer.

@OXHarryH1@alexmeshkin他损失惨重。没有比这更糟糕的政治选择了。他也得到了不好的建议！或者得到的建议不是很糟糕，但实施得很差。作为一个观察者，很难区分两者之间的区别。

@RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Getting the policy decisions that you were supporting when you voted in the candidate, and that you supported and continue to support and makes you enthusiastic about leaders who make life better for voters is not even remotely a "payoff".

@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan获得你在投票给候选人时支持的政策决定，以及你支持并继续支持的政策决定，并使你对那些让选民生活得更好的领导人充满热情，这一点都不是“回报”。

@RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Sure, let's just eliminate every single policy that provides benefits to people because that can be framed as "paying for votes".

@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan当然，让我们取消每一项为人们提供福利的政策，因为这可以被定义为“为投票买单”。

@OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin No subjective! Badly underwater in every poll (i.e. far more than polling error). People aren't happy with the leadership at all. Covid isn't the only issue, but it's one of them.

@OXHarryH1@alexmeshkin没有主观！在每次投票中都表现糟糕（即远远超过投票错误）。人们对领导层一点也不满意。新冠病毒不是唯一的问题，但它是其中之一。

@RadioFreeTom @mehdirhasan Attacking your own voters doesn't sound like a great way to save democracy.

@RadioFreeTom@mehdirhasan攻击自己的选民听起来并不是拯救民主的好办法。

@OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin It's no different than any other policy specialty. Does he or most any politician understand the economy, or military strategy, etc.? Generally no. Their job is to solicit enough different views, listen, and make the right calls.

@OXHarryH1@alexmeshkin这和其他政策专业没有什么不同。他或大多数政客了解经济、军事战略等吗。？通常不会。他们的工作是征求足够多的不同意见，倾听并做出正确的决定。

@OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin No perhaps. Buck always stops with the boss. He may not understand viruses but his job is to pick the right people who do. And also the right people who understand Fox/GOP. And craft policy within those constraints. That's why he gets paid the big bucks.

@OXHarryH1@alexmeshkin也许没有。巴克总是在老板面前停下来。他可能不懂病毒，但他的工作是选择正确的人。以及了解福克斯/共和党的合适人选。并在这些限制范围内制定政策。这就是为什么他能拿到这么多钱。

@_ohcoco_ @tnicholsmd His doctorate is in medicine. He's just never practiced and isn't licensed to practice. He's purely an academic research and professional right wing shit stirrer.

@_他的博士学位是医学。他只是从来没有练习过，也没有资格练习。他纯粹是一名学术研究和专业右翼大便搅动者。

@alexmeshkin @OXHarryH1 Joe would have chosen the same advisors who would have done the same wishcrafting when he was 50.

@alexmeshkin@OXHarryH1 Joe会选择同样的顾问，他们在他50岁时也会做同样的愿望起草。

@OXHarryH1 @alexmeshkin Buck stops with Joe. Blaming his chosen advisors isn't an excuse.

@OXHarryH1@alexmeshkin巴克和乔停了下来。指责他选择的顾问不是借口。

@CHSdoctor @JHowardBrainMD @DrJBhattacharya He can't see patients, no medical license.

@CHSdoctor@JHowardBrainMD@DrJBhattacharya他不能看病人，没有医疗执照。

@DataDrivenMD @DrJBhattacharya Apart from being unnecessary pure drama, is the letter also fraudulent? What "Essential Activities" was he performing?

@DataDrivenMD@DrJBhattacharya除了不必要的纯粹戏剧化之外，这封信是否也具有欺骗性？他在进行什么“基本活动”？

@_ohcoco_ @tnicholsmd The term 'doctor' is ambiguous. It is commonly used in then US to refer to those who treat patients but can also mean someone with a doctorate who does not treat patients.

@_“医生”这个词模棱两可。在当时的美国，它通常用来指那些治疗病人的人，但也可以指那些拥有博士学位但不治疗病人的人。

@villi It's a frontier. Reputation of the sponsor makes the deal salable even if it's otherwise a piece of garbage.

@维利，这是一个边疆。赞助商的声誉使这笔交易很畅销，即使它在其他方面是一堆垃圾。