@LazarusLong13 72% reduction with universal cloth masks.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@LazarusLong13使用通用布口罩可减少72%。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@Gab_H_R @Sergio_DF_ 18.26

@Gab_H_R@Sergio_DF_18.26

@TahirKh92362300 @itosettiMD_MBA @CDCgov This doesn't look a lot like a country that is convinced about "moving on". It's more like a noisy minority, encouraged along by the obvious business interests.
https://apnews.com/article/cov...

@TahirKh92362300@itosettiMD_MBA@CDCgov这看起来不像是一个坚信“继续前进”的国家。它更像是一个喧闹的少数群体，受到明显的商业利益的鼓励。
https://apnews.com/article/cov...

@TahirKh92362300 @itosettiMD_MBA @CDCgov Also, ventilation on airplanes is often terrible when they're on the ground, and "travel" includes far more than just being on a plane (even air travel does: airports, shuttle busses, etc.). Other crowded settings common in travel are not as well ventilated as planes.

@TahirKh92362300@itosettiMD_MBA@CDCgov此外，飞机在地面上的通风通常很糟糕，“旅行”远不止是在飞机上（甚至航空旅行也包括：机场、穿梭巴士等）。旅行中常见的其他拥挤环境的通风不如飞机。

@TahirKh92362300 @itosettiMD_MBA @CDCgov The first sentence is not always true. It depends on a variety of factors including crowding and ventilation. Someone breathing right in your face from half an arms length away on an airplane is not addressed by the air being filtered minutes later.

@TahirKh92362300@itosettiMD_MBA@CDCgov第一句话并不总是正确的。这取决于各种因素，包括拥挤和通风。在飞机上，有人从半个手臂的距离直接对着你的脸呼吸，但几分钟后被过滤的空气并不能解决这个问题。

@TahirKh92362300 @itosettiMD_MBA @CDCgov Going to a packed restaurant during a pandemic is not deemed safe by any expert.
Also, airplanes have good ventilation (yes better than most other places), but there are very few places, not including most restaurants, where you are AS packed as an airplane.

@TahirKh92362300@itosettiMD_MBA@CDCgov在大流行期间去拥挤的餐厅，任何专家都认为是不安全的。
此外，飞机通风良好（是的，比大多数其他地方都好），但很少有地方像飞机一样拥挤，不包括大多数餐馆。

@mbismark That's positive. Any visible trace of a line no matter how faint is positive.

@mbismark是肯定的。任何可见的线迹，无论多么微弱，都是正的。

@tarahaelle @loscharlos @CDCgov @WhiteHouse That sounds like another good story.

@tarahaelle@loscharlos@CDCgov@WhiteHouse听起来像是另一个好故事。

@DonEford @WikiDocJames With less viral load, shouldn't someone be less contagious?

@DonEford@WikiDocJames病毒载量越低，人的传染性就越低吗？

@FinchTH @deb_shaw3 @michaelmina_lab $63 on Amazon, but maybe you see a different price. I think they microtarget discounts.

@FinchTH@deb_shaw3@michaelmina_lab在亚马逊上售价63美元，但也许你会看到不同的价格。我认为他们的目标是折扣。

@ilhamabuljadaye @DrEricDing @MartinKulldorff @StabellBenn Well the first obvious thing is that the confidence interval for the mRNA is huge and crosses one. No conclusion is possible from this data probably due to low number of total deaths in the sample. CI=0.63-1.71

@ilhamabuljadaye@drericing@MartinKulldorff@StabellBenn第一件显而易见的事情是，mRNA的置信区间很大，并且超过了1。从这些数据中不可能得出结论，可能是因为样本中的总死亡人数较低。CI=0.63-1.71

@thereal_truther @AndrewGutmann NYC, I think, had pretty low deaths after the first wave. Similar policies after that really. NYC wave peaks were mostly double digits, SF single digits, NYC as 10x population.

@我认为，在第一波浪潮之后，thereal_truther@AndrewGutmann NYC的死亡率相当低。在那之后，类似的政策真的很普遍。纽约市的波峰大多为两位数，SF为一位数，纽约市人口为10倍。

@thereal_truther @AndrewGutmann Scott Atlas was head of fed policy in most of 2020, which was when a big chunk died. Not really clear how 2021 would have turned out differently.

@thereal_truther@AndrewGutmann Scott Atlas在2020年的大部分时间里担任美联储政策负责人，当时有很大一部分人去世。不太清楚2021怎么会有不同的结果。

@Chateausherrill @ConnieSchultz Corrupt policy makers favoring industry is the answer.
https://twitter.com/IMeanWellR...

@Chateausherrill@ConnieSchultz腐败的政策制定者支持工业就是答案。
https://twitter.com/IMeanWellR...

@SixandLaura @gregggonsalves @Delta It doesn't prove anything, but when you see a progression toward behavior that benefits the pathogen at the expense of the host, it is reasonable to ask about behavioral positive feedback favoring infection. https://t.co/13FekbciIh

@SixandLaura@gregggonsalves@Delta这并不能证明什么，但当你看到一种行为的进展，这种行为有利于病原体而损害宿主时，询问有利于感染的行为正反馈是合理的。https://t.co/13FekbciIh

@OzzyAussieOtty Probably testing and counting better. US missed 90%, possibly more at the peak.

@OzzyAussieOtty可能测试和计数更好。美国错过了90%，峰值时可能会更多。

@headsup44 @Stephie_Joh @AlaskaAir @jhewiz Considering that her profile says alaska, it seems likely.

@headsup44@Stephie_Joh@alaskair@jhewiz考虑到她的个人资料显示阿拉斯加，这似乎是可能的。

@AndrewGutmann @thereal_truther Asian flu and hong kong flus both estimated to have caused about 1 million deaths worldwide. The in-progress estimate from WHO for covid is said to be 15 million (and counting). Typical flu deaths per year globally are probably around 500k. None of this is even close.

据估计，全世界的流感和香港FLUS都造成了大约100万人死亡。世卫组织正在对新冠病毒进行的估计为1500万（正在计算）。全球每年典型的流感死亡人数可能在50万左右。这一点都不接近。

@thereal_truther @AndrewGutmann It was a "bad flu", and when that didn't fit the facts, now it is a "cold" (in fact not, of course).
People aren't just dying on Hong Kong, they are dying in many places, as you know.
How many years of cold deaths would that be? https://t.co/m3yCgyRby3

@thereal_truther@AndrewGutmann这是一种“严重流感”，当这不符合事实时，现在是一种“感冒”（事实上，当然不是）。
人们不仅仅是在香港上死去，你知道，他们在很多地方都快死了。
那会是多少年的冻死？https://t.co/m3yCgyRby3

@AaronFromChi @LawrenceGostin @ScottGottliebMD In January 2021, thousands of people were dying per day. That's a crisis calling for urgency by any reasonable defintion. That the previous administration failed to act on it does not change this.
Better argument between Jan 21 and now.

2021年1月，“Aron Fasky@ LaReistGoestin”SccToGuttLEBMD每天有数千人死亡。这是一场需要任何合理定义的紧迫性的危机。上届政府未能采取行动并不能改变这一点。
从1月21日到现在的争论会更好。