Aeon 的最新消息

@JennD2468 @JeromeAdamsMD Open your eyes https://t.co/jcDydeq5K1

@JennD2468@JeromeAdamsMD睁开眼睛https://t.co/jcDydeq5K1

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@JT_Grindrod https://t.co/Pcv582ctae

@JT_Grindrodhttps://t.co/Pcv582ctae

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@gpward72 @RALee85 hotter on thermal imaging

@gpward72@RALee85热成像温度更高

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@BolognaFishMD @Terrible_TerriC @VincentRK If lockdowns kill more than the virus and South Korea kept numbers low with lockdowns and nationwide isolation, shouldn't like half of South Korea be dead?

@BolognaFishMD@terrary_TerriC@VincentRK如果封锁造成的死亡人数超过病毒,而韩国通过封锁和全国隔离保持了较低的数字,难道韩国不应该有一半人死亡吗?

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@NKinNewEng @choo_ek 🎯
It's both prominent 'respected' antimaskers like DL and every common antimask troll for the past two years. They make the exact same arguments. The only difference is who is saying it.

@NKinNewEng@choo_ek🎯
它既是像DL这样著名的“受人尊敬的”反任务者,也是过去两年里每一个常见的反任务巨魔。他们提出了完全相同的论点。唯一的区别是谁在说。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@benedictecallan @teavangelize @CDCgov A recommendation does not require authority.

@benedictecallan@teavangelize@CDCgov建议不需要授权。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@wsbgnl I've seen no evidence it had ANY impact on vaccinations.
Some have suggested, plausibly, it might have had a negative impact, by suggesting reduced risk and therefore less need for vaccination.

@wsbgnl我没有看到它对疫苗接种有任何影响的证据。
一些人似乎认为,这可能会产生负面影响,因为这意味着风险降低,因此不需要接种疫苗。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@boomer_btc @Sumb00dy1 @ahaanmalik77 @saylor @SECGov If true, someone is paying mining costs in order to accumulate. If it weren't being mined, it would be bought from the market, so the net effect is the same.

@boomer_btc@Sumb00dy1@ahanmalik77@saylor@SECGov如果是真的,那么有人为了积累而支付采矿成本。如果它没有被开采,就会从市场上购买,所以净效果是一样的。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@mcprostar205 @CDCgov And for that matter, control and prevention OF DISEASE, not of hospitals filling up.

@mcprostar205@CDCgov,就这一点而言,是疾病的控制和预防,而不是医院人满为患。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@fairy_garcia_ @wsbgnl 🧵
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wsbgnl It's also impossible for people to keep masks on fully time in many settings such as long distance travel. It is necessary to remove it for hydration, eating, and taking medicine. Lack of universal masking means that the environment in which it is removed is far more hazardous.

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@仙女加西亚@wsbgnl🧵
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@wsbgnl在许多场合,如长途旅行,人们也不可能一直戴着口罩。为了补充水分、进食和服药,有必要将其移除。缺乏通用掩蔽意味着移除掩蔽的环境要危险得多。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@psuedonyms @LazarusLong13 @uche_blackstock https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@LazarusLong13 Safety of airline ventilation and filtration is overrated. High ACH is in the numerator. High occupant density is in the denominator. The ratio is worse than many other settings. Also very low humidity is bad.
https://www.ashrae.org/file%20... https://t.co/0H7zWkb2Ed

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@笔名@LazarusLong13@uche_blackstockhttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@LazarusLong13航空公司通风和过滤的安全性被高估。分子中含有高ACH。高居住密度是分母。这个比率比其他许多设置都要差。湿度太低也不好。
https://www.ashrae.org/file%20... https://t.co/0H7zWkb2Ed

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@greg_travis @vlal42 Not if it makes antimasker parents uncomfortable.
Priorities, please.

@greg_travis@vlal42如果这会让反吸烟的父母感到不舒服,那就不会。
请优先考虑。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@Charlescann6 @flowermusickids @joeyfox85 Here's where she reported testing a fake UVC bulb.
https://twitter.com/RealSexyCy...

Er yes, the 450nm portion of the UV spectrum🙄
(ELI5: UV goes from 100-400nm, germicidal at around 254nm. Like a lot of Chinese "UV LEDs" this is literally just purple-colored 40w light with a tiny bit of UV bleed) https://t.co/CHqiytJfs8

发表时间:4年前 作者:Naomi Wu 机械妖姬 @RealSexyCyborg

@Charlescann6@flowermusickids@Joey Fox85这里是她报告测试一个假的UVC灯泡的地方。
https://twitter.com/RealSexyCy...

呃是的,紫外光谱的450nm部分🙄
(ELI5:紫外线从100-400nm开始,在254nm左右杀菌。就像许多中国的“紫外线LED”一样,这实际上只是带有少量紫外线的紫色40w光)https://t.co/CHqiytJfs8

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 @uche_blackstock This is completely wrong according to the ASHAE paper. Subways are bad, but planes (at least narrow body) are WORSE. https://t.co/5nsMON4hqf

@LazarusLong13@uche_blackstock根据ASHAE报纸,这是完全错误的。地铁很糟糕,但飞机(至少窄体)更糟糕。https://t.co/5nsMON4hqf

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@FRnKY_FRnKY @engineers_feed Bitcoin price AND Big Mac price.

@FRnKY_FRnKY@engineers_提供比特币价格和巨无霸价格。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@EnemyInAState This confuses relative and absolute risk.

@EnemyInAState这混淆了相对风险和绝对风险。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 HT: @FinchTH

@LazarusLong13 HT:@FinchTH

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MelpomeneMel @LazarusLong13 When there was smoking on planes, non-smoking flight attendants would have blood markers for smoking similar to smokers.

@MelpomeneMel@LazarusLong13当飞机上吸烟时,不吸烟的空乘人员会有与吸烟者相似的吸烟血液标记。

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@MelpomeneMel @LazarusLong13 Yes, and even setting aside increased near field transmission they're still not very good.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@LazarusLong13 Safety of airline ventilation and filtration is overrated. High ACH is in the numerator. High occupant density is in the denominator. The ratio is worse than many other settings. Also very low humidity is bad.
https://www.ashrae.org/file%20... https://t.co/0H7zWkb2Ed

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin

@MelpomeneMel@LazarusLong13是的,即使撇开增加的近场传输,它们仍然不是很好。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@LazarusLong13航空公司通风和过滤的安全性被高估。分子中含有高ACH。高居住密度是分母。这个比率比其他许多设置都要差。湿度太低也不好。
https://www.ashrae.org/file%20... https://t.co/0H7zWkb2Ed

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情

@LazarusLong13 Safety of airline ventilation and filtration is overrated. High ACH is in the numerator. High occupant density is in the denominator. The ratio is worse than many other settings. Also very low humidity is bad.
https://www.ashrae.org/file%20... https://t.co/0H7zWkb2Ed

@LazarusLong13航空公司通风和过滤的安全性被高估。分子中含有高ACH。高居住密度是分母。这个比率比其他许多设置都要差。湿度太低也不好。
https://www.ashrae.org/file%20... https://t.co/0H7zWkb2Ed

发表时间:4年前 作者:aeon @AeonCoin详情