Aeon 的最新消息
@MullingMueller @ZekeJMiller @DrEricDing I'm not SURE. There haven't been any pre-existing conditions reported, I think. But she might well be "overweight" (BMI 25+) and/or have asthma. Those are very common, along with the others.
@MullingMueller@ZekeJMiller@Drericing我不确定。我想,目前还没有任何先例报告。但她很可能“超重”(BMI 25+)和/或患有哮喘。这些都很常见,其他的也很常见。
@Rook_SpartyOn @ZekeJMiller @MaddowBlog That's not a requirement. The criteria are based on pre-existing risk factors, not severity of symptoms. Requirement to start treatment early. If waiting for symptoms to develop and progress may be too late.
@Rook_SpartyOn@ZekeJMiller@MaddowBlog这不是要求。这些标准基于预先存在的风险因素,而不是症状的严重程度。要求尽早开始治疗。如果等待症状发展和进展可能为时已晚。
@mskathleenquinn @TheAngryEpi @myrabatchelder @NewsHour @JudyWoodruff That piece is an utter train wreck. I can't even count the clear mistakes and falsehoods. Or, I could, but I'm not going to bother. I'll note though that the concepts of waning immunity and immune evasion aren't even mentioned. It's pure herd immunity modeling nonsense.
@Kathleenquinn@TheAngryEpi@Myrabatcheld@NewsHour@JudyWoodruff女士:那是一个彻头彻尾的火车残骸。我甚至数不清那些明显的错误和谬误。或者,我可以,但我不想麻烦了。不过我要指出的是,免疫减弱和免疫逃避的概念甚至没有被提及。这纯粹是胡说八道。
@TheAngryEpi @myrabatchelder @NewsHour @JudyWoodruff It's an odd framing. Out of pandemic phase (because cases are "low", but pay not attention to the unreported tests) but might go back into pandemic phase. Huh? How many times has this already happened.
@Angryepi@Myrabatcheld@NewsHour@JudyWoodruff这是一个奇怪的框架。脱离大流行阶段(因为病例“较低”,但不注意未报告的检测),但可能会回到大流行阶段。嗯?这已经发生了多少次了。
@juli_bg_bs @macroliter Only 65% is double vaxed, 30% boosted. It's higher % in high risk for the most part (maybe not in some undervalued areas).
No one (apart from a nutty antivaxers) is claiming no reduction, rather there is reduction but a lot of vaxed still dying. Not the 95%+ it once was.
@juli_bg_bs@Macrol升只有65%是双VAX,30%是增压的。在大多数情况下(可能在一些被低估的领域),高风险的风险更高%。
没有人(除了一个疯狂的反吸血鬼)声称没有减少,而是有减少,但很多吸血鬼仍在死亡。而不是过去的95%以上。
@myrabatchelder @NewsHour @JudyWoodruff @CDCgov This severely understates the situation due to low reported testing.
https://twitter.com/ScottGottl...
From @johnbrownstein, evidence that a lot of testing has shifted to at home tests
In turn, ascertainment of positive covid cases has declined
Official cases are undercounting actual infections by wider margin than any point since perhaps late 2020, when testing first ramped up https://twitter.com/johnbrowns...
@MyraBatcheld@NewsHour@JudyWoodruff@CDCgov这严重低估了情况,因为报告的检测很少。
https://twitter.com/ScottGottl...
来自@johnbrownstein的证据表明,很多测试已经转向了在家测试
反过来,新冠病毒阳性病例的确定率也有所下降
官方病例对实际感染人数的低估幅度可能比2020年末以来的任何时候都要大,当时检测首次增加https://twitter.com/johnbrowns...
@FinchTH @macroliter https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
@芬奇@Macrollhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
@JReinerMD There is almost never follow up on these celebrity positive test stories, but most will develop symptoms later. Unlike regular folk, they are tested often so detect positive before symptoms.
@JReinerMD这些名人检测呈阳性的故事几乎没有后续报道,但大多数会在以后出现症状。与普通人不同的是,他们经常接受检测,因此在出现症状之前检测出阳性。