@ThomasMCat If voters actually voted according to their self interest the world would be very different. Long since trumped (no pun intended) by tribalism, outrage, and culture war.

@托马斯姆卡特（ThomasMCat）如果选民真的根据自己的利益投票，世界将大不相同。很久以前，部落主义、义愤和文化战争就战胜了（并非双关语）。

@Gretchen_sf @Noahpinion @HouseGOP MANY others https://t.co/dLDwhUVLF4

@Gretchen_sf@Noahpinion@HouseGOP许多其他人https://t.co/dLDwhUVLF4

@ThomasMCat @Noahpinion That's not anti tax in any way that Rs care about, in fact the opposite. It's taxing rich people to reduce taxes for poor people.

@托马斯·麦卡特（ThomasMCat@Noahpinion）这不是Rs关心的任何反税方式，事实上正相反。对富人征税是为了减少穷人的税收。

@FinchTH @DrNeilStone https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@FinchTH@DrNeilStonehttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@FinchTH @DrNeilStone https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@FinchTH@DrNeilStonehttps://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@FinchTH @DrNeilStone There is more of a direct connection than that even.
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@FinchTH@DrNeilStone还有比这更直接的联系。
https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@MichaelSFuhrer @maskupmelb @zeynep It's especially important for the worker. Many exposures all day long every day.

@MichaelSFuhrer@maskupmelb@zeynep这对工人来说尤其重要。每天一整天都有很多暴露。

@Decidingfactor1 @jmcrookston He said 2-3 million in that interview; still significant.

@在那次采访中，他说有200万到300万；仍然重要。

@DaddyDaragh @JimRosenthal4 @SmartAirFilters @sri_srikrishna The data in that paper show more of a sensitivity to flow rate with LARGER particles.

@Daddyddaragh@JimRosenthal4@SmartAirFilters@sri_srikrishna该论文中的数据显示，对于较大颗粒的流速更为敏感。

@JimRosenthal4 It's also possible to make "minis" with 20x10 filters. Obviously this will likely have less airflow but may be useful for some physical environments.

@JimRosenthal4也可以使用20x10滤波器制作“mini”。显然，这可能会减少气流，但可能对某些物理环境有用。

@__grewal @Reuters Did during the Shanghai outbreak, was tens of thousands. Otherwise mostly not.

@__路透社（grewal@Reuters）在上海疫情爆发期间所做的调查有数万人。否则大多不会。

@StephFarrel @ToshiAkima It probably depends on conditions (wind, etc.). If you could smell someone smoking a cigarette there is some risk.

@StepherFarrel@ToshiAkima这可能取决于条件（风等）。如果你能闻到有人在抽烟，那就有一定的风险。

@Balgor11 @DrSeaPerle @Loretta_Torrago @AtomsksSanakan @TracyBethHoeg It's called journalism. Another unicorn.

@Balgor11@DrSeaPerle@Loretta\u Torrago@Atomsksanakan@TracyBethHoeg这叫做新闻业。另一只独角兽。

@DrSeaPerle @Balgor11 @Loretta_Torrago @AtomsksSanakan @TracyBethHoeg The unicorn exists (not that she kept to it)
https://twitter.com/MehdiHasan...

@DrSeaPerle@Balgor11@Loretta\u Torrago@Atomsksanakan@TracyBethHoeg独角兽存在（并不是说她坚持了下去）
https://twitter.com/MehdiHasan...

@DaddyDaragh @JimRosenthal4 @SmartAirFilters Some measurements here. Interestingly it appears to depend on the particle size. For the larger particles, low speed is best, but not for the smaller particles. @sri_srikrishna
https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...

@DaddyDaragh@JimRosenthal4@SmartAirFilter这里有一些测量。有趣的是，它似乎取决于颗粒大小。对于较大的粒子，低速是最好的，但对于较小的粒子则不是@sri_srikrishna
https://www.medrxiv.org/conten...

@flowermusickids Members of congress (and their families) should not be trading stocks. Pass it on.

@flowermusickids国会议员（及其家人）不应进行股票交易。把它传下去。

@LoboGerda @DrLeanaWen Also true, but then you have to ask why they are getting those sweet gigs rather than the countless other writers and experts that are totally ignored. Which is clout.

@LoboGerda@DrLeanaWen也是如此，但你必须要问，为什么他们得到了这些甜美的工作，而不是无数其他作家和专家，他们被完全忽视了。这就是影响力。

@Decidingfactor1 @jmcrookston What's that Fauci reference?

@决策因素1@jmcrookston这是什么福西参考？

@jmcrookston @DaveDeGraceMD There isn't one. Even when someone defines one, there still isn't one. We've seen it again and again, where thresholds are reached, the goalpost is moved.
Remember the "flu test"?
TPTB want to minimize risks and costs OTHER THAN human suffering, which is a no-count.

@jmcrookston@DaveDeGraceMD没有一个。即使有人定义了一个，仍然没有一个。我们一次又一次地看到，当达到阈值时，球门柱就会移动。
还记得“流感测试”吗？
TPTB希望将风险和成本降到最低，而不是人类痛苦，这是不必要的。

@apmalong @jaclynmacrae Everyone has their role.

@每个人都有自己的角色。