@LazarusLong13 It's typical of his general ignorance of biology and science in general. He's an MBA who has made his career as a political operative. That happened to gravitate to healthcare when he worked on the ACA (and then C19) but he have little to no background in it.

@LazarusLong13 这是他对生物学和科学普遍无知的典型表现。他是一名 MBA，他的职业生涯是政治活动家。当他在 ACA（然后是 C19）工作时，这恰好被医疗保健所吸引，但他几乎没有这方面的背景。

@Gurdur @RyanLEllis @ibrake4ants @LilaBryyy @JDawsonTweets @JeromeAdamsMD @LaneZane1 c/ Something can be effective to REDUCE and the resulting level can still be very significant and problematic, even if lower.

@Gurdur @RyanLEllis @ibrake4ants @LilaBryyy @JDawsonTweets @JeromeAdamsMD @LaneZane1 c/ 某些东西可能对 REDUCE 有效，即使较低，结果水平仍然可能非常重要和有问题。

@mktuttle @DianadelaLuna @wsbgnl They are but to some extent this shows up in the transmission map as high positivity.

@mktuttle @DianadelaLuna @wsbgnl 他们是，但在某种程度上，这在传输图中显示为高积极性。

@auntiewillow @Kyhala @sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@auntiewillow @Kyhala @sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@0bj3ctivity @enigmatikatt @DrEricDing @MackayIM Right, I was referring to the BA5 booster. The BA1 variant is much less closely related. How that translates into booster effectiveness I don't know.

@0bj3ctivity @enigmatikatt @DrEricDing @MackayIM 对，我指的是 BA5 助推器。 BA1 变体的相关性要低得多。我不知道这如何转化为增强效果。

@kimhSALT @Glenn02660664 @daveminyo @VikiLovesFACS @AlastairMcA30 Because the whole topic of this thread is vaccine trials that happened in 2020, and perhaps early statements that were made in early 2021.
Everyone knows that those old vaccines provide very limited protection against infection by Omicron. You're not being clever.

@kimhSALT @Glenn02660664 @daveminyo @VikiLovesFACS @AlastairMcA30 因为这个线程的整个主题是 2020 年发生的疫苗试验，也许是 2021 年初做出的早期声明。
每个人都知道，那些旧疫苗对 Omicron 感染的保护作用非常有限。你不聪明。

@StopCoronaVir12 @BruceSt22513754 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg It's infection AND symptoms. That's quite different from infection alone.

@StopCoronaVir12 @BruceSt22513754 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg 这是感染和症状。这与单纯的感染完全不同。

@BruceSt22513754 @StopCoronaVir12 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg Sure. Symptomatic disease meaning covid-19. Without a test you wouldn't know that.

@BruceSt22513754 @StopCoronaVir12 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg 当然。有症状的疾病意味着 covid-19。没有测试你就不会知道。

@SolNataMD @DailyJLee https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@SolNataMD @DailyJLee https://twitter.com/AeonCoin/s...

@MWM76 Yesterday's rally not just weak, it was batshit crazy.

@MWM76 昨天的反弹不仅疲软，而且非常疯狂。

@Mtrl_Scientist It's still crazy, but the painting is under glass and was unharmed.

@Mtrl_Scientist 这仍然很疯狂，但是这幅画在玻璃下并且没有受到伤害。

@puffycloud19 @ChapelGuilt @sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois Which super spreader event on fully vaccinated cruise ships happened in early 2021?
I'll wait.

@puffycloud19 @ChapelGuilt @sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois 2021 年初在完全接种疫苗的游轮上发生了哪些超级传播者事件？
我会等。

@AhNeeOh1 @CNN Who knows, probably a degree of nepotism. How the world works. She has a reasonable resume though.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11...

@AhNeeOh1 @CNN 谁知道，可能是某种程度的裙带关系。世界如何运作。不过，她有一份合理的简历。
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11...

@StopCoronaVir12 @BruceSt22513754 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg Infection was not an endpoint. The endpoint was symptomatic disease i.e. getting sick with covid. Only people who got sick were tested. You can't determine infection from that because you don't know who got infected by didn't have symptoms. It wasn't part of the study at all.

@StopCoronaVir12 @BruceSt22513754 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg 感染不是终点。终点是症状性疾病，即感染新冠病毒。只有生病的人才能接受检测。您无法从中确定感染，因为您不知道谁感染了没有症状。这根本不是研究的一部分。

@BruceSt22513754 @StopCoronaVir12 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg The endpoint was symptomatic disease. Not infection. Not transmission. Getting sick w/covid or not getting sick w/covid. That's all.

@BruceSt22513754 @StopCoronaVir12 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg 终点是症状性疾病。不是感染。不是传输。因新冠病毒而生病或因新冠病毒不生病。就这样。

@BruceSt22513754 @StopCoronaVir12 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg That's exactly right. People were only tested once they got sick during the trials in 2020 when testing was very limited.
Later studies did more testing and produced data on infection and transmission.

@BruceSt22513754 @StopCoronaVir12 @BallouxFrancois @kallmemeg 完全正确。在 2020 年的试验期间，人们只有在生病时才接受检测，当时检测非常有限。
后来的研究进行了更多的测试，并产生了有关感染和传播的数据。

@Felicia00076632 @LMLeffew @johncar39171823 @JeromeAdamsMD What they said was supported by data at the time.
"Nothing had evolved" LOL, no one could be that dumb to not understand how new variants have emerged that didn't exist in early 2021.

@Felicia00076632 @LMLeffew @johncar39171823 @JeromeAdamsMD 他们所说的当时有数据支持。
“什么都没有进化”大声笑，没有人会愚蠢到不了解 2021 年初不存在的新变体是如何出现的。

@AhNeeOh1 @CNN She's a filmmaker and was there shooting a documentary.

@AhNeeOh1 @CNN 她是一名​​电影制片人，正在拍摄一部纪录片。

@sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois Whether you agree or disagree, the vaccines were not trialed for reducing infection or transmission, just as he said. That is a fact.
Studies showing reduction of infection and transmission came later and contributed to the adoption of vaccine passports.

@sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois 无论您同意还是不同意，正如他所说，这些疫苗并未经过试验以减少感染或传播。这是事实。
显示减少感染和传播的研究后来出现，并促成了疫苗护照的采用。

@puffycloud19 @ChapelGuilt @sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois One of many. If you're actually interested, I'm confident you can find them too.
https://www.cdc.gov/media/rele... https://t.co/ywftbPNTWh

@puffycloud19 @ChapelGuilt @sujayjaswa @BallouxFrancois 众多之一。如果你真的感兴趣，我相信你也能找到它们。
https://www.cdc.gov/media/rele ... https://t.co/ywftbPNTWh