@be_cashy I certainly can't argue what @rogerkver said. He's absolutely right.
But there is also another potential with better results for not only the population, but for the government.
Roger issued a warning. I am discussing a more beneficial alternative to that dystopia.

@我当然不能反驳@rogerkver说的话。他完全正确。
但也有另一个潜力，不仅对民众，而且对政府都有更好的效果。
罗杰发出警告。我正在讨论一个更有益于反乌托邦的替代方案。

It's two different economic paradigms in which value in one is removed from the other.
Bitcoin is a bubble inside the global economy where the rules change.
This is not that esoteric. People know this.
@paulkrugman loves to opine on it as a danger and hazard.

这是两种不同的经济范式，其中一种范式的价值被从另一种范式中移除。
比特币是全球经济中的一个泡沫，规则会发生变化。
这并不是那么深奥。人们都知道这一点。
@保罗·克鲁格曼喜欢认为这是一种危险。

The reason why Bitcoin is deflationary is because the basic value proposition is DIFFERENT than fiat.
The US Dollar is backed by the "full faith and credit of the United States government."
The value of Bitcoin is you.
That difference is deflationary.
https://twitter.com/LetsTrekSp...

比特币之所以会出现通货紧缩，是因为其基本价值主张不同于菲亚特。
美元受到“美国政府的充分信任和信任”的支持
比特币的价值在于你。
这种差异是通货紧缩的。
https://twitter.com/LetsTrekSp...

I don't care if you think the monkey jpegs are racist or not, but alienating people that we need to fix the problems we have both economically and socially and get rich as hell doing it is so short sighted that it is almost outright depressing.
You gonna get rich, anyway.

我不在乎你是否认为猴子的JPEG是种族主义的，但是疏远了人们，我们需要解决我们在经济和社会方面的问题，并且像地狱一样致富。这样做是如此短视，以至于几乎完全令人沮丧。
反正你会发财的。

They claim the money is "leaving the country".
I guess you could put it that way.
It's leaving the reach of the IMF and Wall Street to suck liquidity from it themselves.
It's pure jealousy and the IMF is mad as hell they are being bullied by a piece of software.

他们声称这些钱正在“离开这个国家”。
我想你可以这么说。
它让国际货币基金组织和华尔街自己从中吸取流动性。
这纯粹是嫉妒，国际货币基金组织简直疯了，他们被一个软件欺负了。

This overly complex wording is the IMF admitting crypto trading is sucking so much money out of smaller economies because of the scale of trading that they have to print more money. https://t.co/H1nLWlwPGV

这种过于复杂的措辞是，国际货币基金组织承认，加密交易从较小的经济体吸走了太多资金，因为交易规模太大，它们不得不印更多的钱。https://t.co/H1nLWlwPGV

RT: @BryceWeiner "The least interesting thing about Bitcoin is the price." - Bryce Weiner, circa 2015.

转发：@Brycewiner“比特币最不有趣的事情是价格。”布莱斯·韦纳，大约2015年。

Please notice two things.
#1 Bitcoin is at that point worth well over $1M per token and the volatility is a feature.
#2 People who do not, will not, will never own any crypto STILL BENEFIT.
That's what Satoshi was after, all along.

请注意两件事。
#1比特币在这一点上每代币的价值远远超过100万美元，波动性是一个特征。
#2.没有、不会、永远不会拥有任何加密技术的人仍然会受益。
这就是Satoshi一直追求的。

With the example provided by the countries the IMF is focusing on right now, we can see that if the scale is increased to match the US population in volume and percentage...
... it will deflate the US accordingly.
Then the Fed can go brrrrrr all it wants.
Just trade more BTC.

根据国际货币基金组织目前关注的国家提供的例子，我们可以看到，如果规模扩大到在数量和百分比上与美国人口相匹配。。。
... 它将相应地让美国通货紧缩。
然后美联储可以随心所欲。
只需交易更多BTC。

The IMF and legacy finance expect that money to be in markets so they can profit from it.
Crypto is taking money from fiat markets and it is not returning.
With enough trading in an economy, it causes a fiat liquidity crunch.
That has the IMF pissed.
https://archive.fo/cCtrH

IMF和legacy finance预计资金将进入市场，以便从中获利。
Crypto正在从菲亚特市场上拿钱，而且不会再回来。
在一个经济体中有足够的交易，这会导致法定的流动性紧缩。
这激怒了国际货币基金组织。
https://archive.fo/cCtrH

Money that enter the crypto markets never leaves in any significant percentage.
That means it cannot be used in fiat finance.
That means that money is gone.
That's called "deflation".
It is measured in real time.
https://fiatleak.com/

进入加密市场的资金永远不会以任何显著的比例流出。
这意味着它不能用于菲亚特金融。
这意味着钱不见了。
这就是所谓的“通货紧缩”。
它是实时测量的。
https://fiatleak.com/

I will explain the mechanics of how Bitcoin mass adoption in the US will allow the Fed to print unlimited money, and once you see it it cannot be unseen.
The IMF has already noticed how this works and they are mad as hell.

我将解释比特币在美国的大规模应用将如何允许美联储印刷无限量的货币，一旦你看到它，它就不可能是看不见的。
国际货币基金组织已经注意到了这一点，他们非常愤怒。

Mass adoption means putting up with folks like me who call out behavior and mindsets that limit potential to be accepted on a wide enough basis to make this happen.
If you're more focused on arguing monkey jpegs aren't racist at the cost of mass adoption, you not on my level.

大规模领养意味着容忍像我这样的人，他们的行为和心态限制了在足够广泛的基础上被接受的可能性，从而实现这一点。
如果你更专注于争论猴子JPEG不是以大规模采用为代价的种族主义，那你就跟我不一样了。

Mass adoption in the US means winning over critics.
It means telling the stories from a perspective which illustrates all of the environmental costs and weirdos and distasteful people who are attracted to it are finally serving the greater good.

在美国，大规模收养意味着赢得批评。
这意味着从一个角度讲述故事，说明所有的环境成本、怪人和讨厌的人被它吸引，最终为更大的利益服务。

There is a potential future to use Bitcoin to allow the Fed to print unlimited money.
It's very real. It's actually not that difficult to do.
However, it requires mass adoption in the US.
We can feed, house, and provide healthcare for every American, for free, forever.

使用比特币允许美联储打印无限量的货币是一个潜在的未来。
这是非常真实的。其实没那么难。
然而，它需要在美国大规模采用。
我们可以永远免费地为每个美国人提供食物、住房和医疗保健。

Are you in crypto to get rich making the world a better place for as many people as possible, or are you just in crypto to get rich?
Satoshi didn't launch Bitcoin just for you.

你从事加密技术是为了致富，让世界成为尽可能多的人居住的更好的地方，还是仅仅为了致富？
Satoshi不是为你推出比特币的。

It's not all crypto reporters and it's not even all of the ACJR.
I resigned from the ACJR because of how this was handled.
Hours after the fact, the matter was closed, and singling me out.
I am posting all of this not because Im pissed, but because I am profoundly disappointed

不是所有的加密记者，甚至不是所有的ACJR。
我从ACJR辞职是因为这件事的处理方式。
事发几个小时后，事情就结束了，我被挑出来了。
我发布这一切并不是因为我生气，而是因为我非常失望

If you can't listen... really listen and absorb what people are saying without seeing it as an attack on you personally...
... you are the problem.

如果你听不见。。。真正倾听和吸收别人的话，而不把它看作是对你个人的攻击。。。
... 你就是问题所在。

This passage means more to understanding the racial divide in our society than anything else I have read, anywhere.
"...the most valuable thing I could share was my perspective as an outsider."
I'm not black, but I can listen and I can empower.
But that's it.

这篇文章比我在任何地方读到的任何东西都更能理解我们社会中的种族分歧。
“……我能分享的最有价值的东西是我作为局外人的观点。”
我不是黑人，但我可以倾听，我可以授权。
但就是这样。

In fact, there are journalists in crypto/ACJR who ABSOLUTELY GET IT.
Here's some receipts.
Roll on down the end of this wonderfully insightful op-ed from @DelRayMan and you will see exactly what I'm talking about.
Some journos really do get this.
https://acjr.substack.com/p/-n... https://t.co/jJPLXCu2EG

事实上，crypto/ACJR中的一些记者完全明白这一点。
这是一些收据。
继续往下看@DelRayMan这篇极具洞察力的评论文章的结尾，你就会明白我在说什么。
有些记者真的明白这一点。
https://acjr.substack.com/p/-n... https://t.co/jJPLXCu2EG