Building on promises enforced by violence is effectively a fractional reserve Ponzi scheme that encourages moral hazard. Courts can only re-allocate property and there isn't enough property to back all the promises people make.
在暴力实施的承诺的基础上，实际上是一个鼓励道德风险的分数储备庞氏骗局。法院只能重新分配财产，而且没有足够的财产来支持人们做出的所有承诺。
Smart Contracts are an expression of the Title Transfer Theory of Contract. The only consequence for broken "promises" should be reputation, otherwise we are building on unbacked and unbackable promises. #DAO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
智能合同是合同所有权转移理论的一种表达。违背“承诺”的唯一后果应该是声誉，否则我们将建立在无保障和无保障的承诺之上#刀https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
@MC_NorthSea The clue is in the combination of the words and the term organization/company is an analogy used to explain the economics of collaboration to understand inflation as issuing shares in a company to raise capital to fund the companies activities.
@MC_NorthSea这条线索是这些词的组合，而术语“组织/公司”是一个用来解释合作经济学的类比，它将通货膨胀理解为在一家公司发行股票以筹集资金来资助公司的活动。
@MC_NorthSea The term DAO/DAC was originally coined for the express purpose of describing Bitcoin. See this first use of the terms "decentralized autonomous" in 2013.
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/is...
@MC_NorthSea术语DAO/DAC最初是为了明确描述比特币而创造的。参见2013年首次使用的术语“分散自治”。
https://letstalkbitcoin.com/is...
@bywirenews Not even Satoshi. He is just one voice, one opinion, speaking for himself, with no authority over other users of #BTC nor authority to speak on their behalf.
@连Satoshi都没有。他只是一个声音，一个观点，为自己说话，对#BTC的其他用户没有权力，也没有代表他们说话的权力。
In a DAO, people can advocate for themselves but no one is empowered to speak in the name of others. Like with #Bitcoin, the first #DAO, no one has authority to speak in the name of Bitcoin. You can advocate for Bitcoin, but not speak on behalf of BTC.
在道中，人们可以为自己辩护，但没有人被授权以他人的名义说话。就像第一个#道#比特币一样，没有人有权以比特币的名义说话。你可以倡导比特币，但不能代表BTC发言。
This was not a DAO, because true daos can always recover by forking. https://www.theblockcrypto.com...
这不是刀，因为真正的刀总是可以通过分叉恢复。https://www.theblockcrypto.com...
@crypblock @cmadh_ @jabba_EOS @BPEOSIO @B1 I believe they promised EOSIO projects, not EOS.
@crypblock@cmadh_ujabba_EOS@BPEOSIO@B1我相信他们承诺了EOSIO项目，而不是EOS。
What are your top reasons for building on #EOS?
你建立#EOS的主要原因是什么？
@cmadh_ @jabba_EOS @BPEOSIO @B1 It was not crowd funding, it was a token distribution auction to simulate mining. BTC and ETH burn billions year after year and no one bats an eye. B1 explicitly stated it would not launch a chain.
@cmadh_@jabba_EOS@BPEOSIO@B1这不是众筹，而是模拟采矿的代币分销拍卖。BTC和ETH年复一年地燃烧着数十亿美元，没有人眨眼。B1明确表示不会推出连锁店。
The life of a blockchain dev. https://t.co/iwhn1r0Rhx
区块链开发人员的生命。https://t.co/iwhn1r0Rhx
@dougbutner @TheEOSjourney Every UI can automatically buy the resources needed with only exposing a simple fee just like eth. Don’t blame the flexibility of the system for the poor UI of some apps. Most transactions are free when using anchor.
@dougbutner@TheeosTravely每个用户界面都可以自动购买所需的资源，只需像eth一样支付简单的费用。不要将某些应用程序的糟糕用户界面归咎于系统的灵活性。大多数交易在使用anchor时是免费的。
@kroseranger @EdenOnEOS @gofractally Flexibility is good in life and bad for defining the meaning of words and consensus. Flexibility in defining words, causes the words to lose meaning, which then hinders actual communication and causes breakdown in consensus which can lead to violence and even wars.
@kroseranger@EdenOnEOS@gofractally灵活性在生活中是好的，但不利于定义词语和共识的意义。定义词语的灵活性会导致词语失去意义，从而阻碍实际交流，导致共识破裂，从而导致暴力甚至战争。
The only thing that Eden really needs is a bigger budget and more frequent elections. Both of which are within the power of existing @EdenOnEOS chief delegates. It is up to #EOS block producers and @EosNFoundation to empower Eden to fund its own growth.
伊登唯一真正需要的是更大的预算和更频繁的选举。这两项都在现有@EdenOnEOS首席代表的权力范围内。由#EOS区块生产商和@EOSNoundation授权Eden为其自身增长提供资金。
There is no "official" bitcoin twitter or #bitcoin website. There is no official mining pool or wallet. It is an open and spontaneous collaboration. Eden gives hundreds of people a budget of EOS to do spontaneous good.
没有“官方”比特币twitter或#比特币网站。没有官方的采矿池或钱包。这是一种开放和自发的合作。伊甸园给数百人一个EOS预算，让他们做自发的好事。
A future for @EdenOnEOS exists w or w/out @gofractally. #DAOs don't and shouldn't have a legal entity - imagine #Bitcoin (a DAO) claiming it needs a "foundation" to operate. The whole point of a DAO is to facilitate the spontaneous interactions of individuals creating value.
@EdenOnEOS有一个未来，无论是w还是w/out@gofractally#DAO不应该也不应该有一个法律实体——想象一下，比特币（DAO）声称它需要一个“基础”来运作。道的全部意义在于促进个人自发的互动，创造价值。
@tequilaeos @EosNFoundation Who controls the money that is gifted?
@龙舌兰酒@EOSNoundation谁控制着天赋的金钱？
@GravityMaxx @PopHopTopWop @EosNFoundation I’ve looked into it and it requires more pre-approval and obviously it’s dependent upon the state which can change its mind and regularly does. So it’s like a church that gives up its sovereignty by becoming 501c3. If you need state recognition you are not a DAO.
@GravityMax@PopHopTopWop@eonfoundation我已经研究过了，它需要更多的预先批准，显然它取决于能够改变主意并经常改变主意的州。所以，这就像一个教会通过成为501c3而放弃了自己的主权。如果你需要国家认可，你不是一把刀。
@PopHopTopWop @EosNFoundation I own no equity in B1/Bullish and B1 owns no equity in my business. I only care about the intent and purpose of DAOs as the person who coined the term "decentralized autonomous"
@PopHopTopWop@eosInfoundation我在B1/看涨中没有股权，B1在我的企业中没有股权。我只关心DAOs作为“分散自治”一词的创造者的意图和目的