@FrenchyRagin @Kasparov63 A small number of terminals were paid for by the govt, vast majority were not. This is just another bs WaPo hit piece.
@FrenchyRagin @Kasparov63 少数终端由政府支付,绝大多数没有。这只是另一个 bs WaPo 热门作品。
@FrenchyRagin @Kasparov63 A small number of terminals were paid for by the govt, vast majority were not. This is just another bs WaPo hit piece.
@FrenchyRagin @Kasparov63 少数终端由政府支付,绝大多数没有。这只是另一个 bs WaPo 热门作品。
@ZelenskyyUa I still very much support Ukraine, but am convinced that massive escalation of the war will cause great harm to Ukraine and possibly the world.
@ZelenskyyUa 我仍然非常支持乌克兰,但我相信战争的大规模升级将对乌克兰乃至世界造成巨大伤害。
@Kasparov63 We gave Starlinks to Ukraine & lost $80M+ in doing so, while putting SpaceX & myself at serious risk of Russian cyberattack.
What have you done besides tweet?
@Kasparov63 我们把 Starlinks 给了乌克兰
@DavidSacks SpaceX’s out of pocket cost to enable & support Starlink in Ukraine is ~$80M so far. Our support for Russia is $0. Obviously, we are pro Ukraine.
Trying to retake Crimea will cause massive death, probably fail & risk nuclear war. This would be terrible for Ukraine & Earth.
@DavidSacks SpaceX 的自付费用启用
RT: The brain of your Tesla: Neural networks with 1 billion parameters, completing 144 trillion operations per second https://t.co/Rao4mQDZoT
RT:特斯拉的大脑:具有 10 亿个参数的神经网络,每秒完成 144 万亿次操作 https://t.co/Rao4mQDZoT
@slashdot In other news, remote controlled anal beads sold out everywhere
@slashdot 在其他新闻中,遥控肛珠到处都卖光了
@spideycyp_155 @StonksReddit @Podolyak_M That referendum was questionable, which is why I suggested repeating it under UN (or other trusted entity) supervision
@spideycyp_155 @StonksReddit @Podolyak_M 那次公投是有问题的,这就是为什么我建议在联合国(或其他受信任的实体)监督下重复它
@StonksReddit @Podolyak_M Great, offer a UN supervised vote and if Russia refuses, then war it is
@StonksReddit @Podolyak_M 太好了,提供联合国监督投票,如果俄罗斯拒绝,那就是战争
@Podolyak_M Maybe a similar approach to Kosovo https://www.britannica.com/pla...
@Podolyak_M 也许与科索沃类似的方法 https://www.britannica.com/pla ...
@Podolyak_M No, I’m suggesting voting under UN (or pick your most trusted entity or country) supervision
@Podolyak_M 不,我建议在联合国(或选择您最信任的实体或国家)监督下投票
@RenataKonkoly Russia is doing partial mobilization. They go to full war mobilization if Crimea is at risk. Death on both sides will be devastating.
Russia has >3 times population of Ukraine, so victory for Ukraine is unlikely in total war. If you care about the people of Ukraine, seek peace.
@RenataKonkoly 俄罗斯正在进行部分动员。如果克里米亚处于危险之中,他们将进行全面的战争动员。双方的死亡将是毁灭性的。
俄罗斯有
@RenataKonkoly You are assuming that I wish to be popular. I don’t care.
I do care that millions of people may die needlessly for an essentially identical outcome.
@RenataKonkoly 你假设我希望受欢迎。我不在乎。
我确实关心数百万人可能会因为基本相同的结果而不必要地死去。
Let’s try this then: the will of the people who live in the Donbas & Crimea should decide whether they’re part of Russia or Ukraine
那么让我们试试这个:住在顿巴斯的人们的意愿
@Nemli_mot Indeed. Biggest bot attack I’ve ever seen.
@Nemli_mot 确实。我见过的最大的机器人攻击。
@raulsanchezuk The bot attack on this poll is strong!
@raulsanchezuk 这个民意调查的机器人攻击很强!
@AkiKivirinta The will of the people should decide whether they are part of Russia or Ukraine, but Russia invaded areas that would unequivocally choose to be part of Ukraine
@AkiKivirinta 人民的意志应该决定他们是俄罗斯还是乌克兰的一部分,但俄罗斯入侵了明确选择成为乌克兰一部分的地区
Also worth noting that a possible, albeit unlikely, outcome from this conflict is nuclear war
同样值得注意的是,这场冲突的一个可能(尽管不太可能)的结果是核战争